BOMBSHELL: Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman And Special Referee Miriam Sunshine Reportedly Pass The Torch For Obstruction Of Justice On Case They Allegedly Rigged For Lawyer Pals To 2nd Dept. Appellate Division Judges, To Carry On Tradition of Judicial CorruptionForThem
May 1, 2015 § Leave a comment
We’re back and we’ve continued to walk the beat, we’ve got the inside story, so back to business: The case we’ve followed in Kings County Supreme Court House Index # 22335/2003, supposedly presided over by Kenneth ” Roy Bean” Sherman and Special Referee Miriam Sunshine, which has been and is one among many, reportedly rigged-– , in a Case-Fixing Scam prevalent in the New York Judiciary to con the public and is part of the corruption, we all hear and know about pervasive in our government. The case is now in front of the Second Appellate Division Court Judges, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., PRISCILLA HALL, JEFFREY A. COHEN, ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ., who have, ostensibly, to all appearances, decided to partake in the much read about fraud existent in this case, following in the footsteps of the just mentioned lower judges.
Honorable Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., if your actions are honest and above board, then you should not have any problem or objection to them being posted or publicized.
In deference to our Audience and readership the back story:
The action that 2 subsequent cases are based on, i.e, the case against Defendants, William Hamel, and/of Dinkes & Schwitzer instituted in 2011, and the appeal instituted in 2014, was a Personal Injury case that William Hamel, arrested in 2009 for Bribery of Public Servant and Insurance Fraud, and charged with 19 Felony counts while working for Dinkes & Schwitzer, confessed and convicted in 2013, were hired in 2005 to remedy and prosecute the case with 5 separate Defendants individually listed and separated by commas in the caption, to take the case from this attorney Bert Taras, fired by Plaintiff in matter, (Taras was fired as he was suspected by Plaintiff’s camp of allegedly, stealing money from the plaintiff, and taking bribes from 4 of the defendants, a David Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan to keep them out of the case, which the plaintiff lawyers Taras, and Hamel, Jensen, etc. from Schwitzer & Assoc. did, since they were paid more than handsomely to go along with the underhanded “arrangement” and criminal ruse, thereby not prosecuting the case they were hired to prosecute, with assorted lawyers from the 5th defendant’s law firm a Goldberg Segalla, the defense Counsel hired by Great American Insurance Company that solely covered the 5th defendant, entity 1625 Emmons Ave. Inc., participate in the fraud.
Documents suggest lawyers from Goldberg Segalla, pipelined the loot from the 4 defendants, to the plaintiff’s attorneys. And as they definitely wouldn’t have delivered the payola pro bono, it is assumed they apportioned some for themselves,–
Documents that reveal the initial Theft, bribery and Insurance Fraud and other various other crimes in the plot believed to have been commenced by Taras, also reveal his usurpation from it, as well as the takeover, and continuation of it by Hamel, Jensen, along with other lawyers at various times involved in the case at Dinkes & Schwitzer/so-called now Schwitzer & Associates,so-called now, Schwitzer & Associates, (Word is Schwitzer changed the name to flee from the notoriety,-he can’t), seizing Taras’ lion’s share of the “proceeds”, as of 2005 at his firing.
The 5/2/11 Taras fax correspondence below concealed from the plaintiff, from the fired as of 2005, plaintiff attorney, Bert Taras demanding from Goldberg Segalla, his name be included on the settlement the check drafted, Taras, another alleged cocky criminal admits he is “FORMER PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY” — yet, and get this everybody DEMANDING: ” …ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF” dictating he be included in the payments going to the plaintiff!
The presence of this damning document which was one among many other damning documents that Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer & Associates accidentally on purpose forgot to omit was included in the public record, and remained among the little that was untampered with in the public file. It indicates that Taras was in touch with Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer & Associates and the defendants and Great American defense law firm Goldberg Segalla,–in this fax he addresses lawyer Frank Ciano, from the firm, throughout the course of the case as Taras was fired in 2005. –We want to stress the monies paid to Taras from Goldberg Segalla that this fax refers to are kickbacks as the 4 defendants paid to be illegally left out of the case are monies stolen from and belonging to the plaintiff, are illegal kickbacks as the plaintiff did not authorize any funds to be paid to him and Goldberg Segalla would not have any legal reason to pay him, the content of the fax blatantly displays illegality as it was concealed from the plaintiff, and any contact with him by Schwitzer & Associates and/or Goldberg Segalla was executed without permission of the plaintiff.
But to secure the illegal deal Goldberg Segalla lawyers, covertly respond to the above fax- confirming the illegal transport of funds to Taras and Schwitzer & Associates with Rafael Otero being the ringleader on that end of the ruse
Thus, among Goldberg Segalla’s, lawyers reputed to be known, to be involved, and assisting in the subterfuge, (and documents imply there are several) a Rafael Otero reputedly acted as chief liaison on Goldberg Segalla’s end, dropping off and distributing the money stolen from and belonging to the plaintiff, in the form of a closeted drafted check comprising the “proceeds from disbursements”,–as referred to in Goldberg Segalla, and fired Taras correspondences above, a part of which was most probably stolen from Great American, (of course since it was not with their approval in more all likelihood committing Insurance Fraud which Hamel was already caught committing). The other funds likely, apparently and plausibly, came from the 4 other defendants and paid to Hamel, Taras, Jensen, etc. from Schwitzer & Assoc. and Goldberg Segalla the total of which in a Personal Injury case should have been allocated to the plaintiff, since Hamel, Schwitzer & Assoc. already stole monies, from the settlement, in the guise of fraudulent fess and disbursements when they weren’t entitled to take any money all-allegedly
We sill stress that the plaintiff, now Appellant, emphasized to Roy Bean, Sunshine, in open court on record as well as in documents showing the proof above to them and the same proof to supposedly Honorable Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., of the Appellate Division, in documents that “There is no legal reason for defendant’s lawyers to pay plaintiff’s lawyers”. As the alleged corrupt judges listed who know this, as does the public backed Hamel, Taras, Jensen, etc. from Schwitzer & Assoc. and their lawyers Godosky & Gentile, the press and the public, of which we are both members, can only conclude you are corrupt involved in the Case- Fixing Scam. And that is not alleged!
The presumed subterfuge was, and continues to be, feebly ensconced, to the degree it can be, by the above lawyers as they putatively committed among Felonies, Bribery, Grand Larceny, Insurance fraud, Money Laundering, Tampering with Evidence, and so forth and includes the added attempt to conceal it from the public and the law, which is useless as We won’t let them!
As for the money involved, it is accurately estimated to be in the double digit millions, due to the amount sued for from the get go, and due to the amount of people and lawyers involved. The 4 defendants who allegedly paid bribes to be left out of the case, despite being named separately in the caption from 1625 Emmons, were completely left out of its litigation, and left out of separate litigation against each one. There are no documents anywhere reflecting their inclusion in the case, except for illegal inclusion in the caption and illegal settlement papers, which has been part of the law-violating deception and fraud, as among minor things it depicts vast tampering with evidence at the very least. In fact their exclusion from the case is flagrantly pointed and noticeable; and their exclusion from the settlement check even more so.
There are yet more alleged “players” in the conspiracy, the defence firm of Godosky & Gentile representing Hamel Jensen, and Schwitzer & Assoc. who just happen to influence cases, and the Judiciary, allegedly, as their office is resident to, 61 Broadway, NY NY 10006, same as its neighbors the New York State Committee on Judicial Conduct, and the 1st Departmental Disciplinary Committee– (61 Broadway has consequently been redubbed as the Hub, and “Private Cronies’ Club” of the Legal Profession and New York Judiciary)
It is imputed, as documents also imply Kings County Supreme Court Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, (who objected to our articles as did the Godoskys both writing a letter during the case to Administrative Judge Knipel), and that of his underling Special Referee Miriam Sunshine, rigged the case, acting prejudicially in favor of their pals in the legal profession, by falsifying, suppressing, and tampering with evidence, unlawfully being in contact with the defendants, inventing their own laws, abusing their positions, etc), impairing the plaintiff and plaintiff’s case against them every which way they could, (as the evidence against them supporting the Plaintiff”s case is humongous), obstructing justice, egregiously violating the law, while pretending to oversee Index # 22335/2003, just to keep them out of jail, apparently passing the torch of such detestable conduct, to the Second Department Appellate Division Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., who seem to have taken it.
It is noteworthy, that all of these “alleged”, crimes (and in reality they are not alleged as examination of the records reveal), perpetrated by all of the above mentioned, including those inflicted on the plaintiff and the rest of the public, by cognizant and complicit presiding Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman , (“Roy Bean”a perfect moniker, as is the consensus of most, given his alleged inadequacy as a judge to properly, within the confines of the law adjudicate cases that involve his cronies), and Miriam Sunshine, (as it was consistently announced in court and submitted in documents) took place during the time that William Hamel was arrested, fighting his conviction and confessing to criminal charges, allowed out of being incarcerated only by paying a $300K fine and serving a conditional Discharge in 2013 and on. WE of the public have no tolerance for any corruption especially that which is implemented by Judges paid by the public, using abusing their positions of power against them public that pays them
The case, consequently submitted for appeal, by the now Appellant, whom we will call for his protection, Mr. Charles McCray, (we are changing the name and identity of the Plaintiff as he has been a target of threats and coercion by the lawyers mentioned in this article), a disabled senior,receiving disability, impoverished, and barely surviving on a stagnant income, filed a preliminary and comprehensive motion, a huge document, 150 pages, (excluding the exhibits) with a history of the case being appealed from, including countless exhibits to substantiate McCray’s cause, by all those who read it, accurately revealing depicting the crimes committed allegedly by Hamel, Jensen,Taras Schwitzer, and Assoc. and the allegedly occurring in the courtrooms of Roy Bean and Sunshine in response.(“atrocities”, to quote the document, (The 1st page of the Court Order and Decision referring to it to the left), logically requesting various relief among which requesting waiving all Court Fees–which even to the working person, are beyond dear, including necessary documents as proof of financial straits exceeding compliance with lenient CPLR laws on the matter, allowing and granting the waiver of all fees to indigent appellants, the motion also citing related laws and case law. McCray, in legal documents that we’ve examined categorically states, he cannot at all, afford to pay for the case. Pursuant to legal contacts and insiders, a frequent request that has historically been granted.
McCray in his mammoth document which was followed by a Reply of similar magnitude, thorough, same approximate length, and amount of exhibits, also requesting the Judges remove the Defendants from the caption, as they weren’t sued, —which does not at all have to be court ordered, but by including them in any documents when they weren’t parties to the case, on one front shows blatant prejudicial conduct deliberately enacted to help the respondents, Hamel and friends. and their defense counsel Godosky & Gentile, and on another falsifies and invalidates evidence as well as the case Hamel and friends as well as their defense counsel Godosky & Gentile, are prosecuting.
McCray’s Motion provided proof, (we are posting same below), of the secretive monies unlawfully paid to Hamel, Schwitzer & Assoc. and Taras, by Goldberg Segalla, providing the settlement check naming Great American as the sole payor.
But what is distinctly obvious is that with the Second Department Judges’ allegedly quiescence and concurrence typified by incorporating non- parties to the case on documents whose inclusion on them infers they were included and prosecuted in the case, solely demonstrates the Second Department Appellate Division Judge’s, the supposedly honorable Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., complicity in the crimes.-allegedly. —
Below is the check, and the only check that was cut to McCray by Hamel, the Plaintiff/Appellant in case docket #2014-09509n by Hamel and Schwitzer & Assoc., –that is blatantly missing the names of defendants David Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, Irving Salzburg who Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer & Associates, and Godosky & Gentile fallaciously claim–and in writing they prosecuted in a not just “fully” but “successfully” prosecuted case.–Obviously they were not prosecuted since there names are not on any check, and no other monies came from them to McCray.
The way it goes is, one and only defendant payer on the one and only settlement check demonstrates equals one and only defendant prosecuted in the case and the money from the other defendants went elsewhere than to the Plaintiff.– and we’re going to publicize it.
But with that said, in MacCray’s Motion he also requested, such things that should not be considered as relief, but are considered automatic, integral and contributing parts of any case prosecuted, but were not present in the previous venue, Kings County Supreme neither in “Roy Bean’s” courtroom, nor Sunshine’s, to wit, the abidance to law, the rejection of the respondents adding or removing documents to and from the file as tampering with and falsification of evidence was a consistent occurrence in the case, and transparency in the case, as among things ex parte contact was a constantly ensuing factor, that was incompetently hidden because of the arrogance alleged culprits.–allegedly
Richard Godosky, on the other hand whose office still located in the Hub and Private Cronies Club of Legal and Court System, the 61 Broadway, in opposition submitted a 5 page document maniacally in repetition demanding the denial of the waiver of fees request, solely addressing the denial of waiver of fees request, requesting no other relief, but adding it was “useless” for McCray to go forward with the Appeal, (“Useless?”Why would it be “useless” and how would Richard Godosky know it is ?), containing absolutely no evidence or exhibits whatsoever!
In response, Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ. in response, denied the Appellant’s request, in full, granting Godosky’s Opposition in full!
As we have said, the above judges, are following in Roy Bean’s allegedly, (Allegedly, right!) corrupt footsteps, documents pointedly reveal MacCray made the same request, to have all fees with any relevance to the case waived, on countless occasions to Roy Bean, submitting substantiating documents.
MacCray, the Plaintiff, also requested of Roy Bean to remove the names of any Defendants, who were not parties to the case, since they were not parties to the case, giving proof,–Coincidentally–and there are no coincidences, Roy Bean, ignored and denied that request as well, each and every time, without legality. It should be noted, documents reveal that nowhere in the case including live court proceedings, did the defense object to the removal of the defendants from any document. yet as documents reveal, Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer& Assoc. refused to when instructed by the Plaintiff, as have Roy Bean, Sunshine, and Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ.,, refused to when requested by the now Appellant as well!–We don’t find this coincidental-We find it corrupt.
WE want to be crystal clear, the Court Order Decision above emphasizes, and shines floodlights on the far reaching corruption existent in the supposed legal system and the allegedly corrupt Judiciary as well as the influence peddling that prompted it, as it denies not just fully waiving all related court fees for the Appellant who falls well within the confines of the law to obtain it so it is a perfect example of Obstruction of Justice, but it also ostentatiously and flagitiously, inter alia, denies transparency in the case, accentuating these jurists’ allegiance to their chums, Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer & Assoc., Taras, and Godosky & Gentile, over nad above all else, and their participation in Obstruction of Justice-allegedly.
Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., we want to express our appreciation to all of you, for giving us plenty of fodder to write about. Corruption in our government, has been in the forefront and the focus of the news, and the public eats it up. Writing about it only puts feathers in our caps!
Our articles, past, present, and future articles, their content, and the documents attached will live on for eternity on the internet, never to be deleted, some of which, exist in the Court Records, in among these Court Houses, Kings County Supreme Court, Bronx Supreme Court-Criminal Term, New York County Civil and Supreme Court, the Second Department Appellate Division–that is unless, the records and evidence have been tampered with, which has already occurred in the venues of this case.
Above are just 2 of the pieces of incriminating evidence that demonstrate that Bribes exchanged between defendants/defendant’s lawyers and plaintiff’s lawyers illegally. Hamel, and crew have been incapable of explaining the legality of such payments, and or a letter or fax referring to them, –as none exists, which has allegedly prompted Hamel to escape the Subpoena that demanded his testimony regarding this and other alleged illegal activities involving this among other cases.
While in Kings County Supreme, to support them in their crimes Roy Bean, to participating in obstructing justice, devised 2 Court Orders, one for the public to digest, and the other for illegally withheld from the plaintiff, the public and the public file, making up his own laws, to illegally delay the case, in the 1st Order, and then making up his own laws to put an end to put an end to the case.–allegedly.
But the plaintiff outsmarted Roy Bean knowing this was an illegal Order–no judge can order a litigant to hire an attorney!-Roy Bean was stupid enough to put this in writing. Roy Bean Sherman you are the cause of your expulsion from the Judiciary.
The above was the public version declared and disseminated in court that Roy Bean Sherman wrote on the sly, apparently planning to use. Roy Bean’s order goes on to say, specifically “At this point the case is disposed.”– In violation of law, so secretly written and documented, Roy Bean demands the end of an active case!
This is just one example of Roy Bean being deeply involved in Judicial corruption, participating in the Case -Fixing scam, implementing and partaking in Obstruction of Justice, –which is precisely why the Petitioner’s name is withheld for the protection purposes.
It is the right of every petitioner/litigant to prosecute his or her case pro se. A judge can’t legally order the petitioner/litigant to hire a lawyer–and further give an expiration date for doing such. There is absolutely no legality behind this order. (If it was so important to him for the litigant to hire a lawyer Roy Bean should have paid for it!)
A judge also cannot invent his own laws.
We query, Roy Bean, the client has until 1/30/12 to hire new counsel and if he doesn’t, then what?
Roy Bean Sherman was distinctly delaying the progress of the case, quelling the civil and constitutional rights of the petitioner, abusing the power of his position and must be removed from it.
This is the 2nd version of the 11/14/12 Order, that was illegal in the 1st place. Just above, the Order deliberately hidden from plaintiff, which was put in the public file solely by the plaintiff–which was the only way it was going to get there, as Roy Bean Sherman and his associates weren’t going to file it. This obscured court Order is indicative of the rampant illegal ex parte contact that occurred during the case among the illegal communication Sherman obscured from the plaintiff.
This order indicates that had the plaintiff gotten a lawyer Sherman and Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer & Assoc.,and Godosky & Gentile would have made a deal with him or her to help dispose the case, via blackmail, or extortion as the hiring of legal counsel has nothing to do with restoring a case to calendar.-allegedly.
Since Sherman himself says in his obscured order:”the client has until 1/30/13 to obtain new counsel, whereby new counsel shall make a motion to restore to calendar At this point this case is disposed”–It is not allegedly.
Evidently Roy Bean passed his torch of corruption to Sunshine who ran with it-allegedly. In the next installment we will include 2 documents that reveal, as if it hasn’t been revealed already thorough non-stop Case -Fixing and Obstruction of Justice.
Once again the corruption is regnant in the Judiciary which is why complaints have been lodged against Roy Bean Sherman with the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct demanding his removal from the bench.
After almost 3 years of Sherman pretending to preside over a case but in reality disseminating corruption–allegedly assigning the case without necessity to an Evidentiary Hearing/Hear and Determine and to which by written agreement, he was supposed to have signed off, meaning by law he was supposed to have no involvement in the case. (Which in the next installment we will show the documents our contacts in the Kings County Courthouse have gladly and swiftly delivered to us showing no such thing occurred. Sherman was illegally involved in the case throughout its life in Kings County and likely still is). A Special Referee, Miriam Sunshine was supposed to be the only one to oversee, but in this case no illegal holds were barred
McCray filed a subpoena for Hamel’s appearance (testimony) and records. –Out Audience being highly intelligent knows that violating a subpoena is illegal. But apparently, Sunshine, who’s head is also on the chopping block does not.
Below the subpoena filed for Hamel’s testimony and the start of the Evidentiary Hearing that was supposed to be held in front of Miriam Sunshine,– which, even that could not be administered within the confines of the law, as illegality was raging-allegedly.
On 9/11/13 the 1st day of Court the above subpoena was presented in front of Sunshine who subsequently confirmed it vocally as reflected in the minutes below:
Below, the 9/23/13 Sunshine Court Order supporting the Hamel subpoena denying the motion to quash (it), where Sunshine, although without a doubt in her own wording, reinforces the subpoena for Hamel’s appearance, and which cannot be interpreted any other way, in her unsuccessful effort to be ambiguous (in order to fecklessly save her hind quarters), she deliberately and noticeably, leaves out Hamel’s name –showing her complicity in the Case-fixing scam.
The non-existent Evidentiary Hearing that never quite took place as Miriam Sunshine would abruptly halt it, after hearing the defendants left out 4 defendants from the case taking kickbacks to do so.
To add, Hamel who while given the privilege of his freedom in exchange for serving out a Conditional Discharge not only never showed up in court violating Sunshine’s 9/11/13 vocal demand and written 9/23/13 Court Order demanding that he do so– went unsanctioned by Sunshine.
(Disobeying a subpoena is a violation of law–Everybody has to obey a subpoena) Hamel escaped his subpoena, —-and did so— while serving on a Conditional Discharge, — without being sanctioned by Sunshine, exemplifying that Sunshine is a con artist, obstructed justice, is involved in the Case -Fixing Scam, therefore has no business, like her predecessor, Roy Bean being on the bench, and beyond that judging other people-allegedly
Sunshine then comes down with another beyond-the-boundaries- of-the-law decision, quite in character for her and those involved in the Case-fixing scam, as she violates law, yet again via her 4/30/14 decision where she unlawfully reverses her own 9/11/13 vocal order as well as her 9/23/13 order–Sunshine, a Judge can’t reverse his or her own order–it is illegal.
As it would turn out, Sunshine would abruptly halt what was supposed to be a hearing on 4/30/14 again without legality in the middle of the hearing demanding the summation by “mailed in” and then accepting the usual suspects’ 5 page document substantiated by no evidence.
Regarding the Hear and Determine/Evidentiary Hearing, at the advent of the Hearing papers had to be signed by all parties agreeing on the hearing and on the type of Hearing. Documents reveal that 2 documents were disseminated for signatures. On the 1st, the slot choosing the type of hearing that would allow Roy Bean’s interference, is already checked!.–And that is without the Plaintiff’s consultation and agreement, and signature –checked on the sly–as usual.– allegedly-– The 2nd Hear and Determine document that the plaintiff signed and was privy to was signed by the plaintiff on contingent that Roy Bean signed off on the case. Except that illegally of course Roy Bean never stopped being involved in the case, and never stopped –allegedly
Sickie Richard Godosky foully mouthing off in court ON RECORD spewing threats– not unusual for him, in fact commonplace, as documents reveal that this was not his first and won’t be his last.That said if they were innocent, documents would confirm that–but the documents reveal otherwise.
If they were innocent, they wouldn’t have to they wouldn’t have to resort to threats and coercion. We challenge, any one of the people mentioned in this article to publicly, with substantiating documentation, to disprove anything we have said. We add that the defendants were never compelled by Roy Bean Sherman or Sunshine to prove their case, which is because they are incapable.–(which is among the reasons for the threats by them).
During the case, as an adjunct to the alleged crimes committed, theft of countless dollars, estimated in the millions, the Plaintiff, now Appellant has been subjected to threats and coercion, reportedly spewed by such characters as Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Richard Godosky–all of which is on record.–or should be as tampering with evidence has been part and parcel of the case.
We are informing our Readership it is our staunch belief that these people are under the psychopathic impression they are above the law, and entitled to violate the law.
We are telling all of you, mentioned in the documents in this article are recorded on the public file, (or should be. –And if they’re not they are on the internet ), and are emblematic of your illegal high jinks and are documented in courthouses all over the state. We are extremely proud of Mr. McCray’s action, as is the public, Law Enforcement and our colleagues in the press.
As far as the other concerned parties, We will not hesitate to continue to post and publish all your illegalities.
We recommend to anyone seeking an attorney, to do your due diligence — As a courtesy, for the public’s protection, we do not recommend hiring any of the aforementioned lawyers, i.e, Schwitzer Associates, William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Godosky & Gentile, we do not recommend using their services. As documents reveal contact with them would be at your own risk.
Hamel has already been involved Bribery and Insurance Fraud and to this day, as he has not paid reparations to his victims, is still doing so. That said, he did so while in the employ of Dinkes & Schiwtzer/ Schwitzer & Associates, with their full knowledge. Jensen worked under both Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates and fully participated in the illegalities, C. McCray, the plaintiff was thorough enough to imbed substantiating documents in the public record.
Godosky & Gentile, of 61 Broadway, building neighbors of the DDC and CJC there as the safety net to defend allegedly crooked lawyers such as above as well as allegedly crooked judges.
Since this case which we have been profiling is typical, then in our opinion, we can only surmise that any case that Godosky & Gentile succeeded in winning was only won via illegal means, and nepotism.–which by the way, taints any past cases–as they would not have been adjudicated without prejudice, and raises doubt on the innocence of any client they might defend.
For the information of those involved, We the people are NOT allowing the corruption in the Judiciary to continue.
CAVEAT: As only the alleged guilty will consider this to be inflammatory, the public and law enforcement are glad the allegedly corrupt, (members of), the Judiciary and their Case-Fixing Scams are being brought to the fore. Should any of the supposed criminals mentioned in this article, threaten and/or decide to harm the plaintiff in retaliation in any way, we will have no problem publishing it, and our contacts in law enforcement will be alerted,
Disclaimer: Due to our Journalistic integrity, we have been printing terms such as “alleged(ly)“, “supposed(ly)”, etc. –however we’ve printed them in italics, to emphasize the fact that the criminal actions and incidents we have conveyed to our Readership, our Audience, our Colleagues in the media, the public, after close examination of the evidence, we, without a doubt, know to be true.
Our articles can now be seen on Facebook.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD
*****NEWS BOMBSHELL: DAVID GODOSKY, OF GODOSKY & GENTILE, WAS KINGS COUNTY SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR FOR BRONX DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THAT’S WHY THEIR WHITE COLLAR CRIMINAL FRIENDS HAVE BEEN ALLEGEDLY ABLE TO GET AWAY WITH COMMISSION OF FELONIES AGAINST PRIVATE CITIZENS SCOT FREE (ALLEGEDLY, RIGHT!) NEWS BOMBSHELL*****
June 5, 2015 § Leave a comment
David Godosky Of Godosky & Gentile, Of 61 Brdway, HQ Of Legal And Judicial Cronies Club Headquarters, Was Kings County Supreme Court Judge, Prosecutor For Bronx District Attorney’s Office, –Which Taints Every Single Case He And His Firm Have Been Involved In And Adds Yet Two More Reasons For When Godosky & Gentile, Convicted Criminal William Hamel, And Schwitzer & Associates, and anyone else involved with them, Speak New York Judges Allegedly Listen-(Allegedly, right!)
Due to our wonderful Investigative Journalism team, we are publishing extremely pertinent information that the corrupting forces in our government have been trying to keep under wraps but no longer can as we are exposing them and naming names.
1-TOO CLOSE FOR COMFORT: We have long been posting the fact that Godosky & Gentile’s office is situated at 61 Broadway, Headquarters of the Legal and Judicial “Cronies Club” as the First Departmental which in and of itself is clear connection to the widespread corruption long existent in our government AND Judiciary
2-We have been continuously profiling the notorious, convicted criminal William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates case where they and other lawyers took bribes stealing millions which Godosky & Gentile are not just Defense counsel
3-The Daily News, in 2009 alluded to, William Hamel, (who would soon become a convicted criminal), of/and Schwitzer & Associates, alias, Dinkes & Schwitzer and known at the time, as the Daily News pointedly cites, ” a team of crooked lawyers who would file personal injury lawsuits skimming 40% of the settlements”. (Page 2 below of Daily News article).
4-Therefore, it was well known that Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates were stealing from their clients–(which is what Hamel admitted in his paltry DDC suspension of four months) ,–for bribery before Hamel was recorded in the midst of the committing crimes including those of bribing a Public Servant, thereby committing Insurance Fraud, while in the midst of the sting operation that discovered him in the commission, during his prosecution of the crimes to the exclusion of those committed against clients, and after, as we have shown via documentation.–
Whereas Hamel, while working under the aegis of Schwitzer & Associates,—was prosecuted for crimes against the Government and Corporate America for bribing a Public Servant and Insurance Fraud by in the Bronx Supreme Court -Criminal Term by the New York State Office of Attorney General, and was forced to supposedly pay $300K to the government in penalties for his crimes, (We’d like to know where the money he paid went), he and they were NEVER prosecuted for their crimes against clients, to wit, stealing millions from them, despite outcries and reports to authorities by those same victims. —Absolutely nothing was done; complaints ignored.
The reason that Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates is that CONVICTED CRIMINAL WILLIAM HAMEL AND SCHWITZER & ASSOCIATES ARE CONNECTED TO DAVID GODOSKY OF GODOSKY & GENTILE WHO WAS A KINGS COUNTY COURT JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR FOR THE BRONX DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
In fact there have been many complaints leveled against Godosky & Gentile, their criminal friends, i.e., Convicted Criminal William Hamel, and those from the firm he was working at while he was committing his crimes, Schwitzer & Associates, as well as other “Roy Bean” Sherman, Miriam Sunshine, and other defendants within the profession they have defended, who have strangely gotten away with crimes, among them felonies without government repercussions.
Their illegal influence and say over the cases they are involved in is also the reason that Preet Bhara is dragging his feet when ridding our state of the governmental corruption so embedded in it. Apparently, Bharara is loathe to prosecute the people in his profession, or more accurately, his cronies.
That said, since there are no coincidences, Godosky & Gentile, allegedly is in charge of court rulings in the cases they are involved in–not the presiding judge.
This is allegedly among the reasons why the Moreland Commission was disbanded as it was under the New York State Office of the Attorney General Andrew Cuomo who headed it at the time, and his office who prosecuted Hamel in 2009. There is no way, that they didn’t know that William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates were also committing fraud stealing from clients since they knew they were committing Fraud stealing from Insurance Companies.”
We are not covertly claiming that
Insiders have also pointed out that Godosky & Gentile have ties to the District Attorney’s Office, which is true as David Godosky claims that to be true in his letter above.
For him to write such a letter to the Department of Justice, (DOJ),a lso means he and his firm are too closely affiliated with them as well.–NO wonder the unconnected public has been unable to get their cases presided over fairly.
The original Court Order announced for the “benefit” of public consumption and the public file!
This is why convicted criminal William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates were NEVER compelled to legally answer the subpoena filed for the former’s testimony
This is why convicted criminal William Hamel was allowed to defy and skip out on his subpoena, –and he was allowed to defy and skip out on it while he was serving on a Conditional Discharge.
This is why “Special Referee” Miriam Sunshine, lied in court, allowed Hamel to illegally skip out on his subpoena, illegally demanded summations be sent in–so she could withhold the documents, (the plaintiff outsmarted her and her colleagues via advisement watermarking the documents sent in), this is why she disposed of the hearing/case abruptly and wouldn’t say on record that suddenly the case was disposed.
This is why, in the 2 courthouses, the case against Defendants convicted criminal William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates, defense counsel Godosky & Gentile, all of the latter were not compelled to provide any exhibits and evidence to prove their case
DDC complaints ignored, trashed.
A member of our Audience, a Willy, cited the Robert Godosky as far back as 2013 for being involved in the corruption, to wit, among things for having illegal ties to the District Attorney’s Office posted, September 18, 2013 at 9:30PM:
Based upon information and belief, Robert Godosky is a member of the “N.Y. Departmental Disciplinary Commitee.” His law firm is tied directly to Chairman Roy Reardon of Simpson and Thacher. The members enjoy private practice yet have government status – this is were the corruption begins. You may be interested to know, Mr. Reardon and Simpson Thacher has been retained by Godosky & Gentile in cases where attorneys were accused of misconduct by other attorneys. I would imgaine if you dig deeper into the story, you would find your lawyer was protected. Don’t expect much help from the Manhattan D.A., his father was a partner for Simpson Thacher and members of the DDC enjoy free legal reimbursement from the AG – so, yes, a lawyer can be accused of a crime and use the “right” people to avoid justice with this “watchdog” agency. Until the public demands Roy Reardon’s removal for allowing this system of influence peddling to cease the conflicts of interests, the people and honest lawyers will be unjustly burdened so they can enjoy the high life.”
According to insiders it was because of our articles that Robert Godosky stepped down from The First Departmental Disciplinary Committee as we publicized his membership on a consistent basis which pointed to undue influence on cases he was involved in. In the process, and while pouring through files of cases involving his firm, not one person from their firm, nor any presiding “judge” alluded to the fact that he was a memeber of the DDC, that their office was located in the DDC and NY CJC “Cronies Club” Headquarters, or that more importantly David Godosky was a prosecutor for the Bronx DA’s office–coincidentally where convicted criminal of only corporate crimes William Hamel, was prosecuted,— in addition to being a Second Judicial Department Kings County Supreme Court Judge, which obviously indicates they already allegedly had the “judges” in their pockets, and judgements in their favor before the cases began. (Allegedly, why of course!)
Since Godosky & Gentile and their frequent clients who are constantly defending themselves against clients who have taken legal means, to dispute having their money stolen, (unlike Godosky & Gentile and Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates), have been allowed to get away with filing and continuing frivolous and meritless cases, the activity of which is actually illegal and warrants monetary sanctions yet such have never been imposed because of their nepotism which is obstruction of justice. It can therefore only be concluded that they’ve been reputedly brandishing control over all the cases they’ve been involved with for decades and demonstrates how corrupt they are. Persons with honesty as part of their demeanor, would come forth with the information regarding their connection, as would any unbiased, Judge with the same. (Reputedly, oh sure it is!).
A prime example of their immense illegal influence and the preferential treatment bestowed upon them is the case that we’ve been profiling now in the Second Judicial Department (Kings County) Appellate Division, 45 Monroe St. Bklyn 12201, Docket No. 201409509, and which originated in the Kings County Supreme Court at 360 Adams St. Bklyn 12201.
Thorough research into the public file yielded no evidence that Hamel, Joelle Jensen, and Schwitzer & Associates who originally filed the frivolous case were ever compelled to produce any evidence supporting their phony claims of “fully” prosecuting the underlying personal injury case despite their former client producing tons disputing it proving otherwise. “Roy Bean” Sherman was and is, so engrossed in stupidity as well as the criminality and the blatant hatred and disrespect of the public whom he is supposed to serve, that he went as far as unnecessarily dragging the case out for over 3 1/2 years, thinking he wouldn’t be caught and exposed. (A lot of people don’t like him and quite a few of those people are honest legal staff members of the court who have been our steadfast supporters and contacts who have informed on him), 88888 He then unsuccessfully tried to have the case go into a “Hear and Report” which would have allowed “Roy Bean” Sherman to oversee the case AGAIN--but plaintiff, McCray, knowing of Roy Bean Sherman’s crooked ways vehemently objected Sherman’s presence anywhere on the case outwitting him and his criminal friends in that plan and refused to sign the “Hear and Report” document, a document, that “Roy Bean” Sherman had “ready made” and already signed in an effort to hoodwink plaintiff, McCray.
The David Godosky letter posted above doesn’t just taint the Judiciary but also taints the Department of Justice as it also shows that the Godosky’s who it seems rule New York State government, and thus it’s segments, also are connected to the Federal Government.
Ladies and Gentlemen of the public, if your case had any connection to (convicted criminal) William Hamel, the firm of Schwitzer & Associates and its staff, and/or Godosky & Gentile, and you lost or did not get an appropriate judgment, it is more than highly likely that your case was adjudicated predjudicially, unjustly, illegally.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD.
Schwitzer & Associates Alias Dinkes & Schwitzer As Usual. Allegedly Violate Taxpayers Stealing Their Time And Money As —1. Richard Godosky Submits Second Bogus Affirmation In Opposition, —-This Time, A Two-Page Document Devoid Of Any Evidence/Exhibits,— Yet Manages To Illegally Include In Caption The Four Defendants, I.E., Dave Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, Irving Salzburg, Who, As Everyone Knows, Paid Bribes To Convicted Criminal, William Hamel And Dinkes & Schwtizer Alias, Schwitzer & Associates To be Ousted From Substratal Case, Illegal Actions Allegedly Emulated And Accepted In Full, By Allegedly Corrupt Second Department Appellate Division Judges, (A Misnomer) Chambers, Hall, Cohen and Miller, Via Crony Godosky Covert Decree, (Allegedly, oh right!). ————— 2.According To Court Documents, Schwitzer & Associates Are Allegedly Being Sued For Malpractice —–Yet Again! (Allegedly, oh sure!) We Do Not Advise Hiring Convicted Criminal William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Of Schwitzer & Associates, Schwitzer & Associates, Or Godosky & Gentile, As They Are In It For Themselves
May 30, 2015 § Leave a comment
If Godosky’s 2nd bogus Aff. in Opp. filed in the Appellate Division, is granted, it will be to illegally aid Godosky and clients, Schwitzer & Associates, as Second Department Supreme Court And Appellate Division Judges (A Mis-appellation) Click Their Heels To Accommodate The Former Who Are Part Of The Brethren Defending Themselves Against Another Of Their Many Clients Whom They Allegedly Victimized Robbing Them Of Their Money, The TrialDate 5/29/15. (Allegedly-right!)
Due to overwhelming requests to post Richard Godosky’s 2nd supposed Affirmation in Opposition submitted to the Second Department Appellate Division, our staff has obtained the documents and we are complying with those requests, since we posted his first nonsensical 5-page piece, submitted in the guise of the same, and which was obviously a ploy to make it appear as he was submitting a legitimate Affirmation in Opposition, (which in reality comprised solely 5 pages of repetitive rants), yet by a compliant and complicit judiciary ruled by Godosky & Gentile and convicted white collar criminal, William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates, was fully granted, this, while Charles McCray, the Plaintiff, in the case, submitted a motion of approximately 150 -200 pages, as well as a Reply of same amount enumerating the facts of a 12 year case, with exhibits supporting every assertion and request for relief.
Godosky & Gentile, Schwitzer & Associates constant defense counsel, in cases where former clients of the latter, discovered their cases were not prosecuted, and/or in cases clients unearthed missing and stolen funds, as well as in Malpractice cases–the numbers of these people and cases pointing to alleged wrongdoings have added up over the years so that the eponymous William Schwitzer of Schwitzer & Associates changed the name of the firm to it’s current appellation within recent times, and for years and unsuccessfully, according to reliable sources, William Schwitzer has been using PR firms to try to undo the damage.
Legal contacts report that Schwitzer continues to try to dominate the internet, allegedly hiring several PR firms for the dual purpose of in a fruitless effort to suppress the facts our articles and the documents we post within prove, and to extoll his firm’s alleged wins. –We have previously posted “Roy Bean” Sherman’s and Robert Godosky’s letter to Administrative Judge Knipel, found in the records, complaining about our articles. Robert Godosky, on behalf of his inappropriate, previously unannounced client, Kenneth “Roy Bean” Sherman, proclaimed during a court appearance (paraphrased), that they didn’t like “Roy Bean” Sherman’s moniker!–which is quite unfortunate but had “Roy Bean” Sherman acted honestly he wouldn’t have that handle.
Beyond that, Guys, you may control the Judiciary and have them do your bidding, but you can’t control the the Fifth Estate Or The Internet!
According to legal staff who ensured they were part of the high-turnover pattern at the Schwitzer & Associates firm, Wm. Schwitzer has allegedly been paying off rating websites to remove numerous critical reviews regarding them for years which is in line with reports by members of our Readership who have publicly posted scathing assessments about them for eons, have had their negative critiques suddenly disappear.
The above in addition to having their cronies in the Judiciary allegedly, (which documents prove otherwise–and we’ve posted them and will continue to ) fix legal actions where they are the defendants in their favor,–just as we have been reporting. (Allegedly, sure!)
So desperate are Convicted criminal Wm. Hamel, William Schwitzer and /Schwitzer & Associates, (and per legal industry insiders, they are monetarily desperate) that they have had their defense counsel, Richard Godosky, of Godosky & Gentile, submit anything in place of a legitimate motion, getting the corrupt members of the New York Judiciary to join with them in the gambit, which has actually been an unwise gamble as we, and our contacts are on top it and will continue to post.
But of course that which concerns them tmost is the fact that convicted criminal, William Hamel, and his friends at Schwitzer & Associates owe clients millions of dollars due to illicit activities committed against them, cited by the Daily News, and other News outlets, including world-news-media.com, and boldly emblazoned and supported by documentation which is in public file now in 4 courts,i.e., Bronx Supreme, Criminal Term, New York County Supreme, Kings County Supreme, and the Second Department Appellate Division to be accessible to the public and authorities, in perpetuity, and part of which resulted in convicted criminal Wm. Hamel’s prosecution by the New York Office of the Attorney.
Below are prime examples of the Schwitzer’s and Godosky’s desperation in the form of false documents,–that according to sources the creation of which were allegedly preceded by covert pow wows with several of the Judges involved, and personally handed to them— in an attempt to try to get out of paying the monetary debt and debt to society they owe.(Allegedly, unlikely!).
We all know that convicted criminal Wm. Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates have yet been compelled to prove their case/provide supporting evidence which blatantly points to their guilt as well as that of the allegedly corrupt judges who have allowed it. (Allegedly, oh c’mon!)
Directly below, the 2nd half-baked, Richard Godosky Affirmation in Opposition in response to McCray’s reargued motion which again demonstrates Godosky’s brazen ill-fated confidence that the corruption wouldn’t be exposed when in fact our contacts in the court copied us the document, (as they’ve done before and are more than willing to do again!) and we are presenting it to the immense, immensely, alarmed and objecting public.
Conjointly, with the obvious and illegal approval of Second Department judges, (misappelation), determined to save Schwitzer & Associates money, Richard Godosky, spent as little time as possible, submitting scant motions with zero exhibits/evidence, with relief-granting expectations that thus far without any legal basis have come to fruition only as a result of Godosky & Gentile’s alleged Illegal Ties To The First Departmental Disciplinary Committee, (DDC) AND The New York State Commission On Judicial Conduct, (NY CJC), aka The New York Legal and Judicial Cronies Club, with whom they share the same address, to wit, 61 Broadway New York NY, possess.
But what is tied in and related to the case we have been profiling is the fact that Schwitzer & Associates are again defendants in yet another alleged Malpractice Case or probably more accurately termed as another scam with Godosky & Gentile in tow, as Defense Counsel, obviously on retainer, (Godosky & Gentile have constantly defended these crooks in cases where their courageous clients have spoken up and decided to fight them), —-In fact there have been so many lawsuits filed and fought against them by clients they’ve conned in their scams, cases filed as Malpractice and similar, that they have been in court fighting more than 5 times within the last 10 years wasting the taxpayers’ time and money. (Alleged, right!) Just some of the names we have come across, Belkis Anderson, Yuley Shugol, Dermot Thomas, Charlene McCray, and the list goes on.
That said, below, the 2nd paltry Affirmation in Opposition allowed to be filed as a legal document in the “hallowed” halls of the Appellate Division without any supporting evidence yet again. The fact that Richard Godosky’s first Aff. in Opp. was even glanced at proves preferential and biased treatment.
When in fact the the Godosky’s first Aff. in Opp. contained 5 pages for a 12 year case, bereft of any exhibits or for that matter evidence, the 2nd 2 pages,–and yet the first phony 5 sheet Richard Godosky disarray comprised nothing but repeated rants. (The directions of the A.D. is to include a synopsis of hte “nature” of the case, which of course Godosky’s “essay”, written on behalf of clients Schwitzer & Associates, didn’t as he didn’t have ot comply with any procedural rules.
Yet, the mis-titled Appellate Division “bench-warmers”, Chambers, Hall, Cohen, and Miller, granted them their sole request in full –which was to deny the Plaintiff of his Motion “inter alia” which the dutiful A.D. judges did. A fact that can be explained only by corruption and influence peddling.
As Godosky had and has no evidence to base his case on he supposedly excerpts the plaintiff’s protest of the corruption meted out by the professed judges who are supposed to instead mete out justice.Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com
Godosky then goes on to melodramatically rave “…the court should not tolerate the biased insulting attack made against the learned judges of this court and the one below” . Given the overwhelming evidence supporting McCray’s case Godosky outcries sound in a tantrum.
Convicted Criminal William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, William Schwitzer, Bert Taras, Rafael Otero, and the rest of the motley crew, had no embarrassment, showed no restraint in spreading the guilt, and blame and having the judges join in on the criminality ruining their reputations which are ruined forever. Then again whomever decided to go along with the crime did so consciously as they were obviously going to monetarily benefit–or so they thought. The fact that their illicit activities are being publicized is their own fault.
Further, Godosky must learn that when judges egregiously violate the law such as Roy Bean Sherman, Miriam Sunshine, Chambers, Hall, Cohen, and Miller, they are going to be exposed and the exposure of their wrongdoings will live on after them.
Richard Godosky goes on to lie, (as usual), to the court, because he can, as the the Judiciary is highly corrupt mischaracterizing the judgment of clerks of the court as the Affidavit of Service as well as the motion itself would and could not have been accepted if it were defective as is exhibited below and we’re including pages 12 and 13 the latter Godosky deliberately refers to but is incapable to even paraphrases with any truth.
And now for the infamous pages 12 and 13 the latter page that Richard Godosky refers to with disdain as these are just 2 pages that expressly state and document to be in court record for eternity and now on the internet for the same amount of time the immense corruption existent in the New York Judiciary.
“This is just like what I experienced with Sherman and Sunshine who refused to waive fees for me when the Help center told me the waiving of fees is abundantly common as did your clerks.
And so by denying me leave to proceed as a poor person you are accusing the clerks of lying. That said. Since when are litigants and appellants supposed to pay for justice – Never. And then when they can’t afford to pay the fees, Absolutely Never.
The only reason to withhold the transcripts from me is to hide the records from me and the public. Just like Sherman and Sunshine did.
2-What Transcripts are you referring to? Do give me clarity.You said if the Transcripts are included in the Original Papers—Again, you know very well I subpoenaed records but was deprived of my rights to obtain them by Sunshine. So you know the records don’t contain the transcripts.
I additionally requested the transcripts for the goings-on in the appellate division court re my case. I have a right to be privy to that –nowithstanding you don’t like it. I also requested the appellate Division transcripts –you arbitrarily denied transcripts—when in fact one of the people I spoke to said the Appellate Division is not a Court of record. –Well if that is so then you didn’t red my Motion Or my REPLY which is wht we thought,=–you didn’t need to you just denied inter alia so as to cow tow to your commandants. Of course if there are porceedinsgs that are recorded then I have every right to be privy to them and their transcripts—And since I have trouble with mobility and can’t make your morning sessions, then you are depriving me of my rights to be privy to the events going on in my case—which is in line with an agenda/your agenda based on neptotsim. Either way, it is my right to be privy to the goings on in my case-period.
Next quote: “Motion by the appellant, inter alia, for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 28, 2014, as a poor person, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal, to schedule any appearance on a motion or cross motion in the afternoon, and to schedule oral argument on the appeal in the afternoon.”
We are so thrilled you used the phrase “inter alia” as you have proven once again that your agenda is not based on any honesty but rather cronyism:
For if you deigned to condescend to read my Motion and Reply, instead of covertly discussing your preplanned decision with Godosky, you would have known that I also requested (top paragraph of page 13) transparency in the case, adherence to the law, the disallowance of adding or subtracting records, papers documents, etc. (All of which and worse Hamel, Jensen/D&S, Godosky, Sherman and Sunshine are notorious for,), I also requested getting transparency and adherence to the law by the App. Div. as well as my adversaries.”
And of course the unlawful decision that elicited the reargued motion as well as Richard Godosky’s maniacal 2-page Affirmation in Opposition that the public is supposed to believe.–We can assure the undeserving appellation of Appellate Division Judge given to, Chambers, Hall, Cohen, and Miller that the public and the press do not believe either of Godosky’s Affirmations in Opposition, we know that Schwitzer & Associates don’t have a case which is among the reasons that they never provided any evidence because they haven’t any, we know that there is widespread corruption in New York government of which the corrupt judiciary is a major part and we know that William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates, and Joelle Jensen, Bert Taras, Rafael Otero, Glendoval Stephens and more were and are involved in the same, and have extorted monies from clients as that is what documents reveal.
Among the pointed phrases in the above Court Order that stand out is the fact that the A.D. Judges, (a misnomer) Chambers, Hall, Cohen, Miller, is “inter alia”. Since as we have posted the very relevant pages of Charles McCray’s motion that specifically asked for transparency, abidance to law, (the motion also requested the removal of the defendants who were not included in either the check or the case as Convicted Criminal William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates took bribes from them to be excluded giving them the money that was supposed to go to McCray, to them instead), yet nowhere in any of Godosky’s motion does he mention anything of the sort, the only way Chambers, Hall, Cohen, Miller, would know to pluralize the defendants in the caption would be by illegally communicating with Godosky. Additionally, by writing “inter alia” in re to denying the plaintiff’s motion in full, whilst he provided mounds of corroborating evidence, the only way that any smart or intelligent judge would deny transparency in a case is if he is on the take.
Chambers, Hall, Cohen, Miller, you are not smart have as you have shown yourselves to be wise guys.
Below, two of the pieces of evidence included in the plaintiff’s motions, the first is the letter from Goldberg Segalla, ( Head lawyer and siphoning instrument, Rafael Otero), illegally money laundering funds from Defendants deliberately and illegally included in the capti0n, i.e., Dave Cronen, Flo Grossman, Wini Kiernan, and Irv Salzburg but deliberately excluded from the case and the settlement check to convicted criminal William Hamel Schwitzer & Associates, Bert Taras.
But convicted criminal William Hamel, Schwitzer & Associates, Godosky & Gentile, have claimed they “successfully” prosecuted the case–which is their claim in their current Malpractice case in Kings County Supreme, and Roy Bean Sherman, Miriam Sunshine, Chambers, Hall, Cohen, Miller, who have accepted their case without ANY corroborating evidence, are all honorable when in fact the documentation irrefutably proves otherwise?–We know not.
They only prove how rampant the corruption is and how deeply involved they are in it.
But the unrelenting pattern of criminality is so embedded in the Judiciary, that they have tried to accommodate Schwitzer & Associates because on the heels of the case we have been profiling they have gotten themselves in another fine mess as they are defendants in yet another case filed by a client they allegedly bilked, so that the so-called, Second Department A.D. judges, have been allowing Godosky & Gentile to file insufficient, defective and late Motions, giving them extra time, delaying the case, because they all are members of the Legal and Judicial Cronies Club. As Richard Godosky alludes to in his 1st Aff. in Opposition in Numbers 23 and 24 he and Schwitzer & Associates are low on dough thus to save Schwitzer & Associates money, because there are clients-aplenty that have realized the latter has bilked them of funds, the McCrays, among them, fighting to recoup the stolen money they have plenty of charges and actions to defend!
Below is the current action against Schwitzer & Associates!
Above, another phony claim of a “successfully” prosecuted case as is exhibited below in Godosky’s first Affirmation in Opposition foray:
Notice how Godosky claims the action is not appealable when in fact any Order or Judgement is appealable.
Everyone please look at Richard Godosky’s mania at its hilt as he claims that Dinkes & Schiwtzer “successfully” prosecuted the Plaintiff, Charles McCray’s case when in fact humongous amounts of money is missing, the names of individual defendants are missing from the settlement check as well as their names, there was no separate litigation for them and there are documents besides the check that prove that William Hamel, Dinkes & Schiwtzer, and Bert Taras took bribes from the defendants to be excluded from the case siphoned through Rafael Otero of Goldberg Segalla!
Schwitzer & Associates owe the plaintiff, in the case we have been following millions of dollars they stole. And they obviously owe other former clients which is precisely why they are being protected by the corrupt Judiciary.
Richard Godosky quotes the relevant law, than claims it is too lenient and demands the plaintiff be required to submit other and different documents than required by law! These are not statements written by a person who functions with clarity!
Notice how Richard Godosky proceeds to besmirch the doctors who support the honest citizenry. It is obvious to us that Richard Godosky thinks he and his cronies are entitled to violate the law and if the public doesn’t like it– tough!
The crazed and loopy Richard Godosky sallies forth demanding in # 23:”…accordingly the claim should be denied with costs”!, which we all have been laughing hysterically at since it is the right of any individual to appeal a judgement. It is Convicted criminal William Hamel and Schiwtzer & Associates that stole enormous amounts of money from their clients and we have the proof. It is they who need pay reparations to their victims per the law.
The deranged Richard Godosky who’s disrepute via his threats, and crazy claims, speaks volumes as well as leads and follows him wherever he goes, then is still not embarrassed to write: #24: ….but the costs to our clients which well exceed the fee payable to our clients which has not yet been released.”! The plaintiff requests poor person’s relief giving proof of need and fulfilling the requirements for such and Richard Godosky vehmently objects, when in fact it is his clients who stole monies that were supposed to be paid to the Plaintiff, and then he complains that his clients are in arrears.
By the way, that can only mean that Schwitzer & Associates are and will be continuing to pilfer from their clients to recoup the monies which is why they are again involved in another alleged Malpractice case. (Alleged, yeah right!)
Below is the Court Order, Decision, rendered by Chambers, Hall, Cohen, and Miller on the original motion submitted by the Plaintiff, McCray. We would call them judges but they are undeserving of the honorific.
Below are just two of the other examples of corruption in New York Judiciary The first 2 of course by none other than “Roy Bean” Sherman in flagrant violation of the law, and below that, his sidekick Special Referee Miriam Sunshine in blatant violation of the law.
That said, any persons foolish enough to have kept their heads in the sand hiring Schwitzer & Associates will not be pleased to know that they have been fighting yet another alleged, malpractice case
filed by another of the many clients that William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates –who at that time were known by their alias Dinkes & Schwitzer, —that were their alleged extortion victims (alleged, right).
Richard Godosky, his firm, their clients and cronies, Roy Bean Sherman, Miriam Sunshine, Chambers, Hall, Cohen, and Miller, all needed to be put out to pasture long ago,–and without pay. Their alleged illegal activities went unnoticed and unchecked in the day has long passed. Documents substantiating crimes are easy to come by and easy to post. (Alleged, yeah sure!)
Judges or not, they have to learn when they don’t respect the public for whom they are supposed to work and per the responsibility of their job, they do not deserve the respect due a Judge. When you act like a judge, uphold the law and the people that pay your salary, you will be treated like a judge.
For it is the time of rapid communication, and the internet, –Messrs. everyone knows about the criminality you are allegedly committing; your alleged unlawful behavior is in the court records forever, on the internet for infinity.
Warning: Richard Godosky has made numerous threats, as has convicted criminal William Hamel, Joelle Jensen. Should anything happen to the plaintiff or one of our staff, members of the public, the press, as well as law enforcement, are on high alert to instantaneously go after the perpetrator.
Schwitzer & Associates As Usual Waste Taxpayer Time And Money As: 1- Richard Godosky Submits Second Bogus Affirmation In Opposition, —-Now, A Two-Page Document Devoid Of Any Exhibits,— Which Manages To Illegally Include In Caption The Four Defendants,I.E., Dave Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, Who, As Everyone Knows, Paid Bribes To William Hamel and Dinkes & Schwtizer Alias, Schwitzer & Associates To be Ousted From Case, Accepted In Full, (Via Crony Godosky Covert Decree), By Allegedly Corrupt Second Department Appellate Division Judges, Chambers, Hall, Cohen and Miller, (Allegedly, oh right!).
2-According To Court Documents, Schwitzer & Associates Are Allegedly Being Sued For Malpractice —–Yet Again (Allegedly, oh sure!). We Do Not Advise Hiring Convicted Criminal William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Of Schwitzer & Associates, Schwitzer & Associates, Or Godosky & Gentile, As They Are In It For Themselves
We are now on Facebook–Visit us.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD
AS PROMISED: Richard Godosky Bogus 5-Page Aff. In Opp.Lacking Any Evidence Illegally Including In Caption The 4 Defendants, Who Paid Bribes To William Hamel and Dinkes & Schwtizer Alias, Schwitzer & Associates To be Ousted From Case, Dave Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, Accepted In Full (Via Crony Godosky Covert Decree), By Allegedly Corrupt 2nd Dept. Appellate Division Judges, Chambers, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., Granted In Full By Same, (Allegedly, right!)
May 26, 2015 § Leave a comment
As previously promised, we are posting the 5 page unlawful tirade in the guise of an Affirmation in Opposition submitted with the thorough support of the reciprocal back-scratching Second Department Appellate Division persons, (honorifics unearned): Chambers, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., accepted without exception despite its illegality. In fact in their response, in the form a of a Court Order, and per Godosky’s thinly disguised directives spewed throughout his document, these “bench warmers” follow in illicit suit by granting him his composition masked as a court document, that were it a document appropriately and legally composed, submitted and granted would have been inclusive of laws, case law and evidence.
However true to crooked fashion and corrupt culture rampant in our judiciary, the aforementioned, allegedly intentionally ignored the massive Motion that complied to relevant laws, and which included relevant and supporting evidence instead choosing the low road based on Godosky’s document, which was in response to a legitimate motion, a court order and decision this has no legal basis whatsoever. (We are redacting names to protect the innocent):
The term “useless” is a mighty strange word in this context, as Appellate law is crystal clear when it comes to what is appealable and that which is not. We can only conclude that Godosky is not simply predicting the outcome of what he wants, but he is predicting the court outcome as a result of the directives he is giving to his very compliant cronies, Chambers, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., who will ultimately follow his mandate.
Let us not forget that Godosky & Gentile maintain their office at the Legal and Judicial cronies Club HQ at 61 Broadway, New York NY 10006.–When Godosky (& Gentile) tell a New York Judge to tie his shoelaces, the judge complies, inquires, and rejoinders with,”How tight?”
Richard throughout this document continuously bemoans his his and his criminal clients self-causing and imposed fate. His incessant wailing representative of extreme unhappiness the root of which begs the question, Mr. G, is your olympic sized swimming pool not deep enough for ya’?
The Plaintiff, Charles McCray explained in his Motion, a huge document replete with extensive supporting evidence, that the only legal caption for the case being appealed from thus the case at hand was and is:
1625 Emmons Ave.
because William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates, alias Dinkes & Schwitzer, who were supposed to be prosecuting the case for the plaintiff, instead, took bribes from defendants, i.e., 4 Defendants, Dave Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, to be phased out of the case, stealing the money designated for the plaintiff having it money laundered through the defense counsel, Goldberg Segalla lawyer, Rafael Otero, grubby hands of William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Bert Taras,, –to name but a few involved in this contrivance.
As a matter of fact the Plaintiff gave a very distinctive explanation of the whys and the wherefores, of the above caption and how any deviation alluding to anything but a single defendant, to wit, 1625 Emmons Ave, in the caption as vastly illegal rendering any documents with anything else additionally invalid.
The initial excerpt: “the only legal and accurate caption as the Defendants, Dinkes & Schwitzer, (D&S)/Schwitzer & Associates, and head lawyer, William Hamel, –(prosecuted and convicted of Bribery and Insurance Fraud and suspended by the Disciplinary Committee), committed the same crimes while involved in my case taking bribes to deliberately exclude four, (4), of the individual defendants in the original case and on the original caption, who were supposed to be parties to the action and sued separately were not. Of those three, (3), were intentionally never litigated against, and the 4th, was dismissed by deliberate failure to take a default rendering all four, (4), non-defendants in this Appeal as well as in the underlying case, All unbeknownst to me and the Great American Insurance Company, (the Insurance company involved) swindling me and the latter.”
McCray, the plaintiff of course pointedly substantiated the above with mountainous evidence which we have also obtained:
However, the guardians of the court and their guardians, to wit, the jurists , the latter of which are supposed to mete out justice to the rest of us, yet are as corrupt as the eon is long chose apparently, in their lack of wisdom that they would deny Charles McCray’s REPLY Motion to Godosky’s unhinged cries for the illegal help to stop him, a layperson from obtaining his own money also requested as relief, a case conducted with transparency, abidance to the law, and the deterrence of illegally embedding or withdrawing of documents that are not in the file by Hamel, Schwitzer & Associates, Jensen, Godosky, who have already done so. Excerpted Charles McCray’s Reply: “I didn’t have transparency in the case being appealed from and I should have gotten it in an American Court House. I would like to have it in the Appellate Division”
The request for such things as transparency– a given in any court in the U.S. was “inter alia” by wise guys who are erroneously sitting on the bench, and the laughing stock of the legal profession as the request by McCray for abidance to law as part of the relief request was right there in black and white in his REPLY papers, Messrs., Chambers, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ..
We will further add that at this point we have seen if not all relevant documents than most. Hamel, Schwitzer & Associates , Joelle Jensen and Taras who stole from the plaintiff, Mr. McCray millions of dollars, by taking bribes, owe, far more than the originally estimated, $8, million. The amount owed Charles McCray exceeds $10 million which we will shout from the rafters.
The amount that Charles McCray sued for is $2,50,000 which is in tact, in writting and can’t be refuted, as it is in the records, now in two courthouses at this point–that is unless there is more evidence tampering which our contacts have been keeping an eye out for.
Since Charles McCray sued for $2,50,000 per each Defendant and Hamel, Taras, Jensen, Schwitzer & Associates, took under the table payments from Rafael Otero of Goldberg Segalla, and Cronen, Grossman, Kiernan, and Salzburg, are missing from the case, and they and their money is missing from the check, than Hamel, Taras, Jensen, Schwitzer & Associates have the money.
If what we say is untrue, then we challenge you, Hamel, Taras, Jensen, Schwitzer & Associates, Defense Counsel lawyers Goldberg Segalla, Rafael Otero, explain IN WRITING all the documents that point to nothing else other than exchanging unauthorized funds with Defense counsel lawyers Goldberg Segalla, and the missing monies from the settlement check. — That’s all you have to do. (That said, by the way there are many, many documents you need to explain). We’ll post them all!
But barring that, William Hamel, Schwitzer & Associates, Bert Taras, Rafael Otero, have to pay reparations to their victims.
Next 2 installments:
1-The 2nd Affirmation in Opposition brazenly submitted by Richard Godosky, this time with 2 pages of moans and groans, but with the same amount of exhibits used for evidence, –that is ZERO!
2- According to inside sources, convicted criminal William Hamel deliberately left incriminating documents pointing the finger at otherwise unrevealed accomplices to share the blame and the consequences.
Please watch for more searing articles such as these on other websites and blogs we support such as counterpunch.org, among the websites who share our sentiment and our fervor for giving the money back to the victims of white-collar criminal.
We want to thank our many diligent contacts in our subscribing and donating Readership as well as in the legal profession for their help, our sources for their tips. Keep up the good work.
AS PROMISED: Richard Godosky Bogus 5-Page Aff. In Opp.Lacking Any Evidence Illegally Including In Caption The 4 Defendants, Who Paid Bribes To William Hamel and Dinkes & Schwtizer Alias, Schwitzer & Associates To be Ousted From Case, Dave Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, Accepted In Full (Via Crony Godosky Covert Decree), By Allegedly Corrupt 2nd Dept. Appellate Division Judges, Chambers, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., Granted In Full By Same, (Allegedly, right!)
We are now on Facebook.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD
BREAKING NEWS: Second Department Appellate Division Judges, CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., Denounced For Alleged Illegal Ex Parte Communication, Nepotism In Appellant’s Motion–We’ve Got The Excerpts, And We’re Printing Them. As Members Of The Court Of Public Opinion, Judges, –(A Misnomer) We Believe Every Word, We Deem You Complicit In NYC Government Corruption Part I
May 11, 2015 § Leave a comment
As one of the cases we’ve been following, to wit, the case against William Hamel of Dinkes & Schwitzer alias Schwitzer & Associates rages on, now in the 2nd Dept. Appellate Division just a few paces from their brethren’s court residence, i.e., kings County Supreme Court, where the notorious Kenneth “Roy Bean” Sherman and Miriam Sunshine, supposedly and in unison preside engaging in Case Fixing (to benefit the likes of William Hamel who continues to this day embezzling from clients), engaging illegal ex parte contact, tampering with evidence, illegally allowing Hamel to escape his subpoena—we don’t think we need say more as those are horrendous enough, the aforementioned “Judges” carry on in the lower court’s pattern.
We’ve decided to give some excerpts from the wonderful, and courageous Appellant who has now documented on record the heinous conduct that neither the Appellant nor we nor the rest of the public, press or authorities will tolerate (We are withholding the name of the plaintiff to protect the innocent) :
Plaintiff AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT
Appellate Division Docket No.: 201409509
1625 Emmons Ave., Inc.
State of New York )
County of________________) ss:
“I,The Plaintiff_, being duly sworn, depose and say that :
1-I am a senior disabled layperson, pro se Appellant on disability, who is not working, living on a low fixed income, living in Northwestern Manhattan, i.e., Harlem.
I have been advised to state: that because I am dealing with a criminal element, i.e., the Respondants ,William Hamel—who has a criminal record, and Joelle Jensen, William Schwitzer, Naomi Skura, Robert Shaiman, of Dinkes & Schwitzer aka Schwitzer & Associates, (D&S herinafter and their Defense Attorneys, Godosky & Gentile, i.e, Richard Godosky, who have relentlessly harassed and threatened me, I fear for my safety.
I am submitting this Motion to reargue my 2/13/15 Notice of Motion and my 3/17/15 Reply, (both comprising massive amounts of evidence/exhibits law, and case law substantiating my requests for relief and accusations of which were and still are several), as well as Godosky & Gentile’s 5 page Opposition papers, comprising no exhibits/no evidence, citing CPLR section I more than adhered to, which was mailed to me late, (I received after return date 2/13/15) and clarity/clarification on 3/24/15, Appellate Court Decision Order relating to them, oddly returned all of less than one, (1), week after I submitted my Reply, as both my documents together equaled approx. in total 300-400 pages and the App. Div. is notorious for taking eons to come down with decisions.—
In both my Motion and Reply I requested leave to proceed fully as a Poor Person having all fees waived, (inclusive of filing fees, and those for transcripts for this appeal as well as for the case appealed from, copies and the like in the form of a Court Order, all fees related to this appeal, plus many other types of Relief, including to be paid restitution, have my case/this appeal comprise legal conduct, adherence to the law, legality and legality expressed in the display of the caption of this case in fact throughout and on other documents, ( which is ONLY LEGAL when written as PLAINTIFF–against 1625 Emmons Ave., ) transparency on the case, the disallowance of illegally adding or subtracting documents/tampering with evidence/falsifying business records,– two massive documents for which I included and quoted relevant laws, case law, and in which I included tons of evidence in form of exhibits substantiating and complying with my assertions and requests, accompanied by my over-compliance to relevant laws requiring me to do so to achieve acceptance of my Motion several requests for relief.
–Oh yes, in my REPLY also asked for the denial of Mr Godosky’s late Opposition, which comprised 5 pages of repeated pointless rants–solely demanding I not be allowed to prosecute my Appeal/given permission to proceed as a poor person; his 5 page Opposition sans any related evidence/exhibits, to substantiate his tirade and demands, sans any documentation to counter my assertions or counter my documented evidence supporting my requests—because in fact, he has none, because in fact there is none which in and of itself proves my case, and disproves his; in fact he didn’t even make an effort to confirm his opposition, yet the Appellate Div. Judges, comply with his tantrum, side with Godosky & Gentile of whom, as everyone knows shares their office’s address with the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, (DDC hereinafter) as well as the Commission on Judicial Conduct, (CDC ), so that they beyond close ties with the Appellate Division, “I served two terms on the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the Appellate Division, First Department”, Godosky & Gentile, were, and still are major participants along with Judge Sherman and Spec. Referee Sunshine in the illegal ex parte communications, Falsifying business records and hiding and Tampering with evidence, helping Hamel already prosecuted for Bribery and Insurance Fraud while he was on my case and confessing to it, and facilitation of crime, while committing the same crimes on my case adding Grand Larceny and Commercial Bribe Receiving, Money Laundering, etc. that ensued during the case being appealed from, (Index # 22335/2003) partaking in the deterrence of my prosecuting my case with them so that my rights were not abrogated, rather they were non-existent, and with Sherman and Sunshine complicit in continuing the double standard of (non-) justice. Sherman and Sunshine, fixing the underlying case/being appealed from, denying everything I requested, (giving me that which I didn’t request, and which is of no help) yet granting my adversaries any and all relief, looking the other way so as NEVER sanctioning them for VIOLATING Orders OR LAWS invalidating any rulings so that your denial of my Motion is beyond reminiscent of the cronyism comprising my repulsive experience/all of the above, in the lower court and is simple to conclude ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGEOUS!—In a lower American Court and certainly in a higher American Court.—MORE THAN ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGEOUS!
But before we continue, we all want to thank you, the Appellate Judges for making your illegal ex parte communication with my adversaries, conspicuous, as well as your nepotism and biased agenda, and the planned outcome you have chosen in favor of your cronies, and their Defense Counsel Godosky & Gentile who again share their office at 61 Brdway the focus of the legal profession’s nepotism, sharing their address with Departmental Disciplary Committees and Commission on Judicial Conduct, who obviously wield power in the industry ( In fact I mentioned this in my Motion AND Reply) pointedly clear so soon in the case. Some of the crimes my adversaries committed were and are Class B Felonies, your support of them makes your involvement blatant. Shame on you for your engaging in Criminal Facilitation.
After all in my Motion and my REPLY I did not just discuss at length that D&S didn’t prosecute my Personal Injury case, which the case being appealed from is based on (which originally had five, (5), individual defendants who were supposed to be individually sued), I explained how and why they did it and I provided the illegal Settlement check which has only has one Defendant, 1625 Emmons Ave. Inc./Marvin Gold Management Company, which by Great American Insurance covered and only covered and which was the only payer on it.
As a matter of fact, The check alone proves that not only was just one Defendant prosecuted in my original Personal Injury case, but also that the personal Injury case was not prosecuted at all, (which is premise of this case, what the case being appealed from is based on, and which the check is in reference to, and that only one defendant was sued, only one defendant paid,–so that millions of dollars are missing from the check and payment to me, (and since I wasn’t paid the money Hamel and D&S and Taras stole it), Hamel, Joelle Jensen, /D&S and Bert Taras embezzled millions from me, as I sued for $2,050,000, sum certain per Defendant, making me a crime victim, and making the sum certain that they owe me over $10, 050, 000 for not prosecuting 4 of the defendants.– As a crime victim I am also entitled to restitution. Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Bert Taras, and chums in crimes embezzled the money from me that the other defendants Dave Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, and Irving Salzburg paid them in exchange for being precluded from the litigation from the case and in exchange for paying me. ( EX # illegal Goldberg Segalla, (Rafael Otero and Karen Sack) kickback letter, Bert Taras illegal Kickback Fax)(Ex # 1 Great American Check )”
“I explained that the ONLY LEGAL CAPTION for this case on ANY document in ANY venue is Plaintiff, against 1625 Emmons Ave. Inc. (1) (ONE) Defendant)– –I showed how and why. —-ONE PAYER/DEFENDANT ON THE SETTLEMENT CHECK, EQUALS ONE DEFENDANT SETTLED WITH, EQUALS ONE DEFENDANT PROSECUTED-WHICH IN TURN EQUALS ONE DEFENDANT IN THE CAPTION.-”
“But what does the Appellate Division do in its Decision/Order on my Motion and my REPLY where the caption was accurate and legal and I explain how and why? The Appellate Division displays does the opposite printing the illegal caption :”
1625 Emmons Ave. Inc., et al, Defendants
“Dear Judges, CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., that would only come from having illegal ex parte communication. Shame on you! –Writing et al which states that there is more than one Defendant when we glaringly pointed out in my Motion and Reply that there was only one Defendant on the included illegal Settlement check, is perpetuating the illegality, helping, Dinkes &Schwitzer with their case, benefitting and protecting, them. –But then you know that. OUTRAGEOUS! Did you actually think we wouldn’t notice it in your response?”
“And how foolish of you as you have proven that you have conspired with my adversaries, and that among things, illegal ex parte contact transpired since Godosky didn’t even raise the issue– not on record. But the fact is, I did. Yet the Appellate division judges defiantly write the illegal caption so that it is in line with Godosky’s wishes, perpetuating the illegality, wrongly indicating there were several defendants prosecuted in the Personal Injury case,– anyway.—You don’t want to remove from the caption Cronen Grossman Kiernan, and Irving Salzburg who paid Hamel and his gangsters kickbacks to be excluded from the case? You then succeed in making your illegal discriminatory agenda abundantly clear.—”
“My advisors and I went through the illegal covert tactics promoted by Sherman and Sunshine for almost 4 years—How do you think Sherman duplicitous double-dealing,/ double, contrary and concealed, 11/14/12 court Orders were discovered.—It wasn’t by accident.”
“The fact is Godosky never even disputed the issue of the caption in his Opposition papers indicates, there was no reason for the Appellate Div. Judges –or staff—to choose to write anything other than Marcia Salzburg-against 1625 Emmons Ave., Inc. the only correct and legal caption since I was the one who explained how and why, it is so, giving irrefutable evidence supporting it and on record. The issue was neither disputed nor countered as in fact Godosky said nothing about it or anything about it, or anything else –(because he can’t prove it because D&S didn’t prosecute Cronen, Grossman, Kiernan, and Irving Salzburg, or my case, as they were paid kickbacks to omit them from it, stealing the money that would have gone to me.”
“In addition to not raising the issue, Godosky ‘s Opposition papers didn’t even include any evidence at all regarding anything including this or any other issue. There would be no reason for the appellate Division Judges to write anything but the caption that is on my Motion and Reply–That is, unless you consulted with them —which you obviously did—covertly and illegally.—”
“Among the other things, Mr. Godosky’s Opposition was NOTICEABLY, devoid of not just exhibits/evidence laws and case law, but there was a dearth of purpose, substance, clarity, and thus effort. Yet you granted him his request.–The only reason a lawyer why a lawyer, in this case has not included exhibits/evidence laws and case law is because they knew the case was/is illegally fixed in his favor, so why bother.”
As a result App. Div. Judges you blatantly have already proven that you have an illegal agenda, the case is already decided, you have taken their side-already and Appellate division Judges you have done so WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE SUPPLIED OR PROVIDED BY GODOSKY THAT IS ON RECORD. WHICH FURTHER SUBSTANTIATES, THE FACT THAT THIS CASE IS FIXED, AND ILLEGAL EX PARTE COMMUNICATION OCCURRED TO PROTECT “CRIMINAL RECORD” WILLIAM HAMEL, DINKES & SCHWITZER, (D&S) JOELLE JENSEN, “ET AL” TO PROTECT THEM, THEIR INTERESTS, THEIR REPUTATIONS, THEIR KICKBACK PAY-OFFS AND THE DEFENDANTS WHO ARE THEIR BENEFACTORS AND WHO ILLEGALLY PAID THEM IN KICKBACKS, — (WHICH IS WHY THEY HAVE ILLEGALLY WRITTEN THE CAPTION INCLUDING THE NON-DEFENDANTS IN THE FIRST PLACE). AND TO SHELTER THEM FROM THE VERY LONG ARM OF THE LAW, WHICH IS NOT GOING TO WORK,— Alternatively, Please do give us clarification re how and why this was done, could happen, how, since it looks like how it impossibly isn’t/couldn’t be—When logic, our Motion and Reply Godosky’s Opposiotn, and your response/Decision regarding them tells us this is exactly what has/is been going on.—As it did before.”
Lastly I might inform you that it doesn’t take a court order to remove names from the caption.”
Below is the Decision on Motion the above refers to. This is only part of the Motion the Appellant was compelled to write in response to the corruption that anyone who does not have an office located at 61 Broadway New York NY 10006, home base of the “Cronies Club” of the Legal and Judicial “Industry”
To the above Mssrs. CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, COHEN and MILLER, JJ.,–none of you deserve the honorific of “Judge”. We find you despicable. You obviously function at and on the same low level as your confreres, William Hamel, Schwitzer & Associates, their defense Counsel, Godosky & Gentile, and of course“Roy Bean” Sherman, and Miriam Sunshine. As we have made public the appalling misconduct of “Roy Bean” Sherman, and Miriam Sunshine, and as we are working to rid the Judiciary of the above 2 who apparently don’t fathom the difference between right and wrong, we will not hesitate to give you the same courtesies.
Just a few for the road:
To Godosky & Gentile as well as Mssrs. CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates have any kind of case there wouldn’t be such a humongous paper trail disputing it–(And you also wouldn’t have to threaten the Appellant ) Your antics are not only in the court records for eternity they are now on the internet for the same. i
Dear Appellant, we are immensely proud of you. Kudos and Bravo.
WE, and the rest of the public, media, and those in the government are on your side.
BOMBSHELL: Second Department Appellate Division Judges, CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., Denounced For Alleged illegal Ex Parte Communication, Nepotism In Appellant’s Motion–We’ve Got The Excerpts, And We’re Printing Them. As Members Of The Court Of Public Opinion, Judges, –(A Misnomer) We Believe Every Word, We Deem You Complicit In NYC Government Corruption Part I
Next Installment: More documents from this segment of the case.
In the meantime:
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD
William Hamel Of Dinkes & Schwitzer Alias Schwitzer & Associates, Despite Conviction Of It Still Involved In Bribery-Allegedly
May 6, 2015 § Leave a comment
Hamel’s name prominently in documents below.
According to current court documents Hamel is still involved in bribery and Insurance fraud besides other crimes, embezzling funds from clients.-allegedly
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD
William Hamel, Schwitzer & Associates, Alias Dinkes & amp; Schwitzer Cited For Embezzling Millions From Clients In Court Documents AreAllegedly Being Protected By The Crooked New York Judiciary Influenced By Defense Counsel Godosky & Gentile Of 61 Broadway The Legal Profession And Court System “Cronies Club” Headquarters: THERE ARE NO LEGAL CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE DEFENDANTS OR THEIR LAWYERS PAY PLAINTIFF’S LAWYERS AND WHEN DEFENDANTS OR THEIR LAWYERS PAY PLAINTIFF’S LAWYERS, THEY ARE PAYING THEM KICKBACKS
May 4, 2015 § Leave a comment
“There are no legal circumstances where Defendants or their lawyers pay Plaintiff’s lawyers”
We are quoting the statement said on record and in open court umpteen times as well as in documents in the courtrooms of Kings County Supreme Judge Kenneth P. Sherman–better known as “Roy Bean”, and Special Referee Miriam Sunshine, as well as in documents presented and submitted to Appellate Division Judges: Cheryl E. Chambers, L. Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ.. However, to protect their white collar criminal friends, Hamel who confessed to bribery and Insurance Fraud, and the law firm he was working for at the time of commission of these crimes, to wit, Schwitzer & Associates, alias, Dinkes & Schiwtzer, and to protect their defense counsel, Godosky & Gentile, have ignored the facts ruling in Schwitzer & Associates favor, at their defense counsel, Godosky & Gentile bidding.
According to Robert Godosky of Godosky & Gentile, and we quote “There is no money!”-Well the documents say differently.
Below refers to kickbacks paid to Dinkes & Schwitzer, by defendants’ lawyers Goldberg Segalla who acted illegally as go between delivering the money. The payments were not and are not authorized by the Plaintiff and in fact were obscured from the plaintiff.
The case originally had a David Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, and Irving Salzburg as Defendants listed in the caption. But they paid kickbacks to William Hamel who was already involved in Bribery and Insurance Fraud, of Schwitzer & Associates, alias, Dinkes & Schwitzer, to be kept out of the case using their lawyers, their defense counsel Goldberg Segalla as the funneling Instruments in the Bribery, Grand Larceny and Fraud, Obstruction of Justice, contrivance.
Below is the illegal public order dreamed up by Sherman which is illegal on many fronts–illegality invalidates any court order. 1-As we have said is illegal as as judge can’t demand a litigant hire legal counsel. 2- Sherman in his own handwriting and in front of many witnesses wrote this court order with the knowledge that the defendants were left out of the case as he was also presented with the above kickback correspondences, and was told of the circumstances in court. Sherman chose to break the law, and withhold evidence from the public file, despite Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates embezzling millions.
The illegal public Court Order of Roy Bean Sherman above written in defiance of the law, the and in defiance of public that pays him his wages
Allegedly Sherman was not satisfied with the illegality of the above order. Thus to make it extra illegal, Sherman complied the hidden version of the above court Order rendering the active case disposed!
However, to speak in the vernacular that alleged (Alleged, right!), criminals such as Roy Bean do: Yo Roy Bean, since you’ve the temerity to write Cronen, Grossman, Keirnan, Salzburg in the caption, then you must know where their money is since their names, as is their money, missing from the settlement check:
Court documents reveal that William Hamel, confessor to Bribery and Insurance Fraud, and colleagues, Schwitzer & Associates, ( the latter, previously called Dinkes & Schiwtzer) as well as our articles and those of Daily News and other news outlets, committed like crimes embezzling millions from clients have found their safe haven in the courtrooms of the New York Judiciary as they are being defended by members of the “Cronies Club” whose headquarters are at 61 Broadway, New York NY 10006
“There are no legal circumstances where Defendants or their lawyers pay Plaintiff’s lawyers”
The above statement was also announced in open court on record and in documents to Miriam Sunshine who promotes white collar crime as well, since she provoked Hamel to flee his subpoena. Hamel never showed up in court while he was on a Conditional Discharge when criminals are supposed to keep their noses squeaky clean. –Sometimes criminals noses are just too dirty as in this instance!
Sunshine first reinforced the subpoena for Hamel’s testimony, during 9/11/13 court appearance as is evidenced below, and reinforced her words recorded in court in her subsequent court Order of 9/23/13. But to do Godosky & Gentile’s bidding, she chose to violate the law by illegally reversing her decision verified in 2 court records, by telling the Plaintiff and Defendants that the latter may choose whom they please to testify in place of Hamel.
“There are no legal circumstances where Defendants or their lawyers pay Plaintiff’s lawyers”
The above statement was also stated in the same documents as are above to the Appellate Division Judges to wit, Cheryl E. Chambers, L. Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ.. who chose to come down with an invalid decision as their decision indicates there are more than one defendant who were included in the case via the caption:
But they also invalidate their own decision as they denied the Appellant such things as abidance to law, disallowance of illegal addition to or subtraction from the records, and transparency! (We might add that the appellant requested a full waiver of exorbitant court fees that the non-working and those on a low fixed income cannot afford, which was denied in as well which is not in accordance with the law as well.
Appellate Division Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, L. Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ.., it was your choice to make this decision. Should you challenge us we will be beyond glad to show the public the motions that requested the relief.
To coincide with the above, Appellate Division Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, L. Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., in order to further obstruct justice,–they granted their buddies’ Godosky & Gentile’s motion sans any evidence to substantiate, and caused an already expensive endeavor attempted by the appellant, to be repeated as the appellant had to reargue the motion spending more money, which defeats the purpose of asking for the fees to be waived in the first place-allegedly, (Allegedly, right!)
So there is no money but there are many documents that say there is and the settlement check is missing money from the defendants who were supposed to be included in the case!
“There will NEVER be any legal circumstances where Defendants or their lawyers pay Plaintiff’s lawyers”-
Aforementioned judges in both venues, you have invalidated your own judgements and have proven your alleged, (alleged, right) involvement in corruption!
We urge the authorities to rid our legal system of the alleged, (Alleged, right) scum that it is composed of.
The Daily News, and other news outlets are and were stating facts regarding this matter as the above documents allegedly, (Allegedly, right) indicate.
We once again warn the people involved: Should any harm come to the plaintiff/appellant the Authorities have been alerted.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD
Open Letter To Thomas A. Klonick, Chair, Of The New York State Commission On Judicial Conduct (NYCJC): We Strongly Urge You To PERMANENTLY Remove Kings County Supreme Court Judge Kenneth P. Sherman, Who Has Allegedly (Allegedly? Not Per The Documents), Colluded In Case Fixing Scams, Obstruction Of Justice, And Other Alleged, Forms Of Corruption From The Bench, The Authority Of Which The NYCJC Is Empowered To Impose. We The People, Of The Media And The Public, Do Not Tolerate Governmental OR Judicial Corruption.
May 1, 2015 § Leave a comment
Dear Mr. Klonick,
It has come to our attention, complaints have been leveled against Kings County Supreme Court Judge Kenneth P. Sherman alleging tremendous corruption citing his active involvement in Case Fixing Scams, Obstruction of Justice, the evidence of which we have seen embedded in the public file, and which should provoke the expeditious removal of Sherman and whomever else is involved in these Case-Fixing scams, under the jurisdiction of the NYS CJC.
With examination of the documents, as far as we can see his actions are not alleged. We are posting just some of the documents included in the records which support accusations of his alleged corruption–( Please note as this is a news article we are compelled to print such terms as alleged when frequently referring to that which is factual).
The Order to the left was the 11/14/12 Order for public consumption.
The order below was the hidden and opposing version of the 11/14/12 COURT ORDER, completely different from the public version announced in court recorded on record that Sherman invented “in camera” apparently planning to use if the plaintiff were dumb enough to acquiesce to his demand to hire an attorney.
Sherman devised the Order without consultation of the petitioner in fact hid this order from petitioner, and public file again withholding documents and evidence from the public and public consumption. committing Abuse of Power, Obstruction of Justice.–allegedly This order only documented in public file via the plaintiff who mentioned it in open court embedding it in motions. This Order indicates Roy Bean Sherman along with the Defendants, Hamel, Jensen and their lawyers, Godosky & Gentile, would have allegedly made yet another illegal and shrouded deal, this time with whatever lawyer that might have been hired to betray the plaintiff, as apparently they.Hamel Jensen, Godosky & Gentile would have used any tactics including blackmail, to safeguard their white collar criminal cronies from incarceration; Roy Bean Sherman specifically says in his order that upon the “plaintiff obtaining legal representation, there will be a motion to restore to calendar”–This completely illegal as the case was and still is active, and obtaining legal counsel is irrelevant. Roy Bean Sherman’s order goes on to say, specifically “At this point “The is case is disposed.” –Really! The case is disposed and the pro se counsel is not privy to it-Really! This is just one example of Roy Bean Sherman being deeply involved in Judicial corruption, participating in the Case -Fixing scam, implementing and partaking in Obstruction of Justice, allegedly–which is precisely why the Petitioner’s name is withheld for the protection purposes. The photo is Courtesy of World-News-Media.com
These are 2 contradicting Court orders for the same appearance date, created by Sherman. The one on the left revealed publicly, and the 1 on the right was concealed, and completely contradicts it, putting an end to a case coincidentally brought against Sherman’s friends in the legal field, William Hamel who was fighting 19 Felony counts of (Bribery and Insurance Fraud at the time) as well as his firm Dinkes & Schwitzer, (Currently Schwitzer & Associates), the end of which would have strictly benefitted them. The just mentioned crimes were relevant to the case referenced in documents above as the plaintiff in the case was accusing them of similar crimes committed on the plaintiff’s case. The order on the right was devised, written, and hidden from the plaintiff in and during the case, never mentioned in open court or on record only to be put in the record via the plaintiff–Bravo!
Mr. Klonick, whatever excuses Sherman may give for the above there are none that are in line with the law. Whatever lawyer Sherman can get to defend the above, such legal counsel cannot makeup any excuse for the above in line for with the law.
We should not have to write that the above Orders have no place within the confines of the law: 1- A judge cannot order a litigant to obtain legal counsel for whatever reason. 2- A Judge cannot delay a case on the pretense of ordering a litigant to obtain legal counsel. 3-Obtaining legal counsel has nothing to do with disposing a case–and behind the back of plaintiff 4- A judge cannot put an end to an active case for no legal reason 5- A Judge cannot create hidden orders. -To wit, a judge cannot create hidden orders legally.
Please be aware all we have to do is produce 1 piece of evidence to prove our point. And all it takes is 1 case to prove our point. That said, we know of more documents in the public file, that without a doubt indicate alleged impropriety on Sherman’s part when in fact there’s not supposed to hint of it associated to any jurist in our system. that is, if Sherman and the others allegedly illegally involved have not tampered with the records they have been alleged to do.
Documents reveal that Sherman allegedly made a persistent effort to persistently suppress evidence from the public file. So deliberate were his alleged efforts that the plaintiff after requesting Sherman release documents to the file, had to resubmit documents which from what we can see were also withheld from any timely release to the public file.
According to the document at right, the original this was personally handed to Sherman. Not only was the original withheld from the file but the resubmitted version was also withheld from the file not to be released until Sherman was of a mind to.-allegedly.
Civil servants, such as Sherman are supposed to be serving the public which is what they are paid to do They are not supposed to use their positions to serve themselves and their cronies, fixing cases, and obstructing justice to strike points for themselves with the latter whose defense counsel just happens to be Godosky & Gentile, the law firm whose office is situated at 61 Broadway, the same address as the NYSCJC, and the 1st Departmental Disciplinary Committee.–Do not attempt to tell us or the rest of the public that influence peddling has not gone on!
Civil servants, such as Sherman are supposed to be serving the public, which is what they are paid to do–not vice versa.
Such wrongdoing must be dealt with by the swift eradication of the perpetrator from his position by the authorities, that are put in place to do so in which case is the NYSCJC. which admits so on their own website. We will accept no less. And we quote:
By provision of the State Constitution (Article 6, Section 22), the Commission:
shall receive, initiate, investigate and hear complaints with respect to the conduct, qualifications, fitness to perform or performance of official duties of any judge or justice of the unified court system…and may determine that a judge or justice be admonished, censured or removed from office for cause, including, but not limited to, misconduct in office, persistent failure to perform his duties, habitual intemperance, and conduct, on or off the bench, prejudicial to the administration of justice, or that a judge or justice be retired for mental or physical disability preventing the proper performance of his judicial duties.”
When one commits egregious crimes against the public in which he or she serves, Judge or no, he is a perpetrator.
It has come to our attention that it has long been known, and allegedly swept under the rug, that Judges, such as Sherman, are allegedly working against the citizenry that pays them,–thinking they are deserving of their wages.–They are not; as they have an unabashed air of entitlement to defy of the law which flies in the face of not only the law itself, but also in the face of their employers, the public that pays them their unearned wages.
It has also come to our attention that Sherman is not alone in the Case-fixing Scams-allegedly. We will write as many open letters as need be, to rid our government and Judiciary of these criminals whose collars happen to be white.
We Of The Media And Public Tolerate Neither Governmental Nor Judicial Corruption. We are in full support of the complaints filed against Sherman and impatiently are waiting for his removal from office something of which obviously should have occurred a long time ago.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD