William Hamel Of Dinkes & Schwitzer Fights Bribery Charges, Plea Bargains, Pays $300K And Gets Conditional Discharge On Same While Allegedly Taking Bribes On Other Cases-Alleged Proof Posted

April 27, 2013 § 2 Comments

Dear Readers,

After many meetings, we’ve taken a consensus among our contributors and friends at the Kings County Supreme Court Courthouse and thusly decided to post the damning letter that demonstrates Dinkes & Schwitzer’s  and William Hamel’s alleged involvement in a bribery scheme  at the same time the latter was fighting federal felony charges  for exactly that, a bribery scheme. We certainly add that Hamel was not only fighting the Bribery charges against him, simultaneous to allegedly illegally taking bribes  on this case Salzburg v Emmons Ave, Inc.,– (which is what this letter attests to), but was also  concurrently pleading guilty to the Federal charges for bribery, taking a Plea Deal for such, paying out $300K in fines, and getting a Conditional Discharge while trying to allegedly trying to hide this crime from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York.

A little background to explain this letter: Dinkes & Schwitzer were the plaintiff’s attorneys. Goldberg Segalla were the defendant’s attorneys.  There is no legal defense  for defendants  or their lawyers to pay plaintiff’s lawyers.

ON PUBLIC RECORD: Plaintiff's Attorney Firm Goldberg Segalla 5-12-11 Letter Acknowledging alleged Illegal--as these payments were unauthorized by the Plaintiff, payments to Plaintiff Laywers, Dinkes & Schwitzer and William Hamel, (who worked on/oversaw  the case while allegedly hiding these illegal payoffs from the Office of Attorney General and while William Hamel was concurrently fighting off 19 Counts of Felony Bribery and Conspiracy Charges to which William Hamel pleaded guilty to, paid $300K in Fines, and was let out on a Conditional Discharge (Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com)

ON PUBLIC RECORD: Plaintiff’s Attorney Firm Goldberg Segalla 5-12-11 Letter Acknowledging alleged Illegal–as these payments were unauthorized by the Plaintiff, payments to Plaintiff Laywers, Dinkes & Schwitzer and William Hamel, (who worked on/oversaw the case while allegedly hiding these illegal payoffs from the Office of Attorney General and while William Hamel was concurrently fighting off 19 Counts of Felony Bribery and Conspiracy Charges to which William Hamel pleaded guilty, paid $300K in Fines, and was let out on a Conditional Discharge (Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com)

A little comment to any of the parties mentioned in this letter who may object to its posting: Object away, this letter is part of public record. We have redacted the plaintiff’s 1st name because the plaintiff is the innocent victim of the alleged machinations of the other parties mentioned in this letter.

It is our opinion that parties mentioned in this letter, such as William Hamel, and certain lawyers of Dinkes & Schwtizer, as well as a Bert Taras,  (also mentioned in this letter), the plaintiff’s former lawyer whom the plaintiff fired apparently years before, as well certain lawyers from Goldberg Segalla who are saying in this letter to Dinkes & Schwitzer: “…we will not have the disbursement check drafted until such time as the issue regarding the proceeds between your office and Bert Taras, Esq., are resolved.”, which indicate alleged illegal under the table payoffs,are very dangerous. Therefore should they or and the Court from which this comes, (that is, Kings County Supreme Court), retaliate against us or the plaintiff, we will be quite amenable to publishing that as well.

From the prior article:

To satisfy the terrific demand of our audience we give you this Breaking News:  Our legal compatriots at the New York State and City Supreme Court Court Houses  have found out that William Hamel, ESQ. was allegedly fighting for his legal life and career, and allegedly taking the Felony charges filed against him seriously, he was allegedly taking bribes in relation to other cases.

Situation in point: our Court Contacts have discovered a communique from a case Dinkes & Schiwtzer and their lawyers, inclusive of William Hamel were involved in from the Defense Attorneys on the case saying: “Please note that we will not have the disbursement check drafted until such time as the issue regarding the proceeds between your office and bert taras, esq. are resolved.”

Some clarity to any of our readers with no legal background. There is absolutely no legal justification for the defendants or their counsel, –(according to this letter, a firm allegedly called, Goldberg Segalla), to pay a plaintiff’s counsel a “disbursement check”  or any type of payment without the written authorization of the plaintiff. We forcefully add that:

1- According to this document these payments were unauthorized by Dinkes & Schwitzer’s client, the plaintiff, and according to the latter, these were bribery payments.

2-When the Court ordered on record as well,l as signed a Court Order demanding Dinkes & Schiwtzer to surrender the records regarding this case, Dinkes & Schiwtzer,  allegedly failed to. –And, we don’t expect them to, as by doing so they would be compelled to reveal details of the above.–at the very least.

3-What was Hamel, and Dinkes & Schwitzer, as well as this, Bert Taras, (the plaintiff’s former attorney who, as we found out, was  fired by the plaintiff years ago doing taking payments of any sort from the defendant’s lawyers)

4-What was Bert Taras doing still being involved in a case he was fired from years ago?

5-This letter is dated 5/12/2011. Hamel’s case was going on from 12/23/09 until its disposition which was 3/28/13.

6-It sure seems like Hamel and his cohorts at Dinkes & Schwitzer were involved in alleged dirty dealings with the defendants, their lawyers, and this Bert Taras.

7-William Hamel, Esq. and Dinkes & Schiwtzer, and this Bert Taras, Esq., Goldberg Segalla, we will be quite glad to post this letter if it please you all. In fact we’re deliberating as to whether we will post it whether it please you all it or not.

The plaintiff has repeatedly mentioned a fear for safety on court papers given that these are allegedly  dangerous people–and we agree.

We will be so very glad to post the whole OSC, (Order to Show Cause), this document is contained in to accommodate the Kings County Supreme Court.

Ladies and Gentlemen, we have found this information out through the diligent work of our wonderful contacts at the Kings County Supreme Court Courthouse. We cannot thank them enough.

We must tell you all we are tenaciously working to get more information on the matter

Please notice, First 1/2 of written line in the 6th Column: "Crim Facil 4". --(which means Criminal Facilitation). Second written line in the 6th Column: PG--(which means Pleads/Plead Guilty) to 115.00 (Photo courtesy World-News-Media)

Please notice, First 1/2 of written line in the 6th Column: “Crim Facil 4”. –(which means Criminal Facilitation). Second written line in the 6th Column: PG–(which means Pleads/Plead Guilty) to 115.00 (Photo courtesy World-News-Media)

Hamel Mug Shot Prisoner Moverment Slip

Hamel Mug Shot Prisoner Moverment Slip (Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William Hamel’s $300K Fine paid in the form od a Bank Check as the Government does not trust him–as well they shouldn’t! Please notice, First 1/2 of written line in the 6th Column: “Crim Facil 4”. –(which means Criminal Facilitation). Second written line in the 6th Column: PG–(which means Pleads/Plead Guilty) to 115.00Thank goodness for our court sources. (Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com)

 

 

ON PUBLIC RECORD: Plaintiff's Attorney Firm Goldberg Segalla 5-12-11 Letter Acknowledging alleged Illegal--as these payments were unauthorized by the Plaintiff, payments to Plaintiff Laywers, Dinkes & Schwitzer and William Hamel, (who worked on/oversaw  the case while allegedly hiding these illegal payoffs from the Office of Attorney General and while William Hamel was concurrently fighting off 19 Counts of Felony Bribery and Conspiracy Charges to which William Hamel pleaded guilty to, paid $300K in Fines, and was let out on a Conditional Discharge (Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com)

ON PUBLIC RECORD: Plaintiff’s Attorney Firm Goldberg Segalla 5-12-11 Letter Acknowledging alleged Illegal–as these payments were unauthorized by the Plaintiff, payments to Plaintiff Laywers, Dinkes & Schwitzer and William Hamel, (who worked on/oversaw the case while allegedly hiding these illegal payoffs from the Office of Attorney General and while William Hamel was concurrently fighting off 19 Counts of Felony Bribery and Conspiracy Charges to which William Hamel pleaded guilty to, paid $300K in Fines, and was let out on a Conditional Discharge (Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com)

THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD.

Advertisements

§ 2 Responses to William Hamel Of Dinkes & Schwitzer Fights Bribery Charges, Plea Bargains, Pays $300K And Gets Conditional Discharge On Same While Allegedly Taking Bribes On Other Cases-Alleged Proof Posted

  • Kia Rodriguez says:

    As an update, Mr. William Hamel was terminated from his position at Dinkes & Schwitzer and is currently employed by Herbert Subin, Esq. at Subin & Associates.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading William Hamel Of Dinkes & Schwitzer Fights Bribery Charges, Plea Bargains, Pays $300K And Gets Conditional Discharge On Same While Allegedly Taking Bribes On Other Cases-Alleged Proof Posted at world-news-media.com.

meta

%d bloggers like this: