The Dinkes & Schwitzer Soap Opera Continues on 9/11: Hearing Set For Case Dinkes & Schwitzer To Determine “If They Are Earned” To Payment For Case They Dragged Out 10 Years
August 19, 2013 § 1 Comment
We have received countless emails asking for an update via our blog as so many of you are hard-working citizens and our newspaper is your only connection to information regarding these alleged, crooks (alleged, right!), and as the Daily News puts is “Ambulance Chasers”. We do have news. And that you all don’t have to attend any court dates or hearings but can still keep abreast of the goings-on and so that you can be sure to avoid these alleged criminals, like the plague,—-we must emphasize to all of you, that William Hamel, is NOT an alleged criminal as, the fact is, he pleaded guilty to Criminal Facilitation. (Whereas we are not lawyers–and don’t plan to be, we would not advise anyone to hire anyone who is is and pleaded guilty to Criminal Facilitation),Thus by his own admittance, he voluntarily committed a Class A Misdemeanor, (a Class A Misdemeanor is the worst Misdemeanor one can commit when it comes to Misdemeanors. A Class A Misdemeanor can yield jail time. In Hamel’s case he got a Conditional Discharge from serving jail time and paid some $300K in fines to our government. So, Dear Readers, plainly, this guy consciously committed his crimes, was no one’s patsy, and blatantly this guy has a record!)
We have been alerted by our friends at the Kings County Supreme Court House that there is a Hearing set for 9/11/13 at 2:30 PM in room 356 to determine whether Hamel/Dinkes & Schiwtzer is entitled to legal fees and disbursements for a case they, along with their alleged comrades (for whom allegedly, Dinkes & Schwitzer worked, Goldberg Segalla, according to the former’s own letter of 5/12/11, below showing Goldber Segalla, allegedly illegally, paying them off.–Illegally as Dinkes & Schwitzer and Goldberg Segalla were supposed to be on opposing sides. And since when does Defendant’s or their lawyers pay/pay-off Plaintiff’s lawyers–NEVER.(DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEYS , mind you!–This is truly a juicy Soap Opera. How unprofessional at the least. More accurately it is allegedly illegal–allegedly?-Right!)
We have already contacted interested parties who cannot be there via email. Not to worry, we will continue to keep you all abreast of the Hearing the same way.
To continue however, now of course, Dinkes & Schiwtzer was helped in their endeavour to prolong this case–Two, (2), years, mind you,– by the allegedly, dishonorable Judge Kenneth “Roy Bean” Sherman –“Roy Bean” or “RB” Sherman as he is notoriously known in the (legal) trades and profession. —–(RB, we will be oh so glad to post at least three instances where you, allegedly flagrantly ((allegedly, Yeah right!), abused the pro se litigant in favor of your brethren –to show your utter disdain and allegedly blatantly, and allegedly pre and ill-conceived plan to try to stick it to the litigant, i.e., when you deliberately had the litigant who was on time for the court appearance, wait an hour while you and your cohort, a Robert Godosky, (defending Dinkies & Schyster, –oops, Dinkes & Schwitzer in this futile effort), lollygag into the court at the same time-an hour late. The absolute nerve of you! Oh, and let us not confuse the above reference, the “Brethren” with the honest brethren of the Burger Supreme Court, Ladies and Gentlemen. To be sure, there is absolutely no connection to Burger or honesty when making reference to these guys.
Fellow Americans of the public jury, we must tell you we’ve seen the public record. Dinkes & Schwtizer allegedly, don’t have a leg to stand on when it comes to entitlement of any monetary fees in this case. Let us see, among the things Dinkes & Schiwtzer did instead of prosecuting this case was allegedly, at the least breaching the contract, allegedly, (allegedly, yeah right!), committing fraud, falsely charging for their own case they filed in secrecy in New York County without the knowledge and approval of their client when in fact the actual case was venued in kings County, and so forth and so forth!–This, according to public record. This is in the KIngs County Supreme Court House, (of Horrors), and in the New York County Court House records. AND IN FACT WHEN IT WAS BROUGHT TO DINKES & SCHWITZER’S ATTENTION BY THE LITIGANT —-IN COURT DOUMENTS MIND YOU,–THAT THERE WERE, AT THE LEAST, DISCREPANCIES IN THE CHARGES, THEY CONTNUED TO CHARGE FOR THEM!!!!!–Dear Readers, this is all in the public record.–Continue to refer to Index # 22335/03– A lesson in how to lose your credibilIty and clients.
We have to wonder, how many other cases Dinkes & Schwitzer pulled these alleged, illegal shenanigans that they were hired for. And if the current JHO/Special Referee is honest, –and we hope so for his/her sake (as we will be sure to publicize any discrepancies should we not find this to be the situation, there is no reason why the litigant should not prevail–and that is by law. That is to say that whether the litigant says/proves it vocally is not at issue. As the case against Dinkes & Schiwtzer is proved by the documents alone–(Which is among the things that make “Roy Bean” Sherman’s allegedly disgusting attitude, even more heinous and repugnant.– Hey Roy Bean, we’ve got some friendly advice– you may, when your stint as a Judge is over in 2014, you may want to do whatever it is that you do in the private sector.)–Not that you’re going to attract a lot of business that way but it might yield you some anonymity!)–
Not only do Dinkes & Schwitzer not have a leg to do anything with, we and the rest of the public fully support the litigant to whom Dinkes & Schwitzer allegedly, owes tons of money, but they allegedly, owes tons of money because they allegedly, stole tons of money form the litigant who is a former client.
Now the Daily News reported that Hamel of Dinkes & Schwitzer “skimmed” at least 40% from settlements. That’s exactly what the litigant has said. And so, Dear Readers, everyone is wrong?–We know not! (See below) So at this point we must question why is Dinkes & Schwitzer even defending themselves in this case, just to waste taxpayer’s money? We think that’s one reason.
Daily News artcle below left. (Can be found in the public record for case 22335/03)
Clearer Hamel mug shot in the center.(Can be found in the public record for case 22335/03)
In the next installment we will tell you even more, Dear Readers….. THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD