Hear Ye! Hear Ye! Hamel and Dinkes & Schwitzer Will Allegedly Be Fighting For Their Lives As Their 9/11/13 Hearing Regarding the Case They Dragged Out For 10 Years Looms
August 21, 2013 § 7 Comments
Let us preface this article with the fact that we have intentionally not published, and made it a habit not to publish all the allegedly, (allegedly, yeah right!), incriminating evidence against Hamel/Dinkes & Schiwtzer that we are aware of. To be sure, there’s plenty more.
As we previously let you all know, there is what is called an Evidentiary Hearing set for 9/11/13 in Room 356 in the Kings County Supreme Court House, (Of Horrors), at 2:30 PM to determine whether Hamel/Dinkes & Schiwtzer are entitled to Legal Fees and Disbursements allegedly did not earn in a case, Index # 22335/03 they dragged out with the alleged help of the other alleged conspirators–(and by this time the list that allegedly Hamel and the alleged Dinkes & Schwitzer gang have collected—-Let us give a preliminary count, William Hamel, (who has a criminal record now as he admitted to bribing a Public Servant and so was allowed out of serving time by paying out $300k in fines and by agreeing to a Conditional discharge), William Schwitzer, The Eponymous, –(Hey Schwitzer, look it up!), who as such allegedly and logically oversees and is allegedly cognizant and allegedly cognizant of what Hamel does, (Ladies and Gentlemen, of the jury of Public opinion, we make a distinction as we are trying to be nice thus in the course of being so we could say he is not cognizant–So Schwitzer, you choose), Joelle Jensen, very negatively prominent in the Court documents of this case,.
Then there’s Bert Taras who was the former attorney who the Plaintiff fired who then filed documents for /this being after the litigant fired him and when Hamel/Dinkes & Schiwtzer were supposed to, all without the knowledge and permission of the client, in this case,–Oh yes Ladies and Gentlemen)–And, get this, Hamel/Dinkes & Schiwtzer allegedly didn’t want to be without a cut of the pay-offs so are allegedly SHARING them, –not happily we might add with Bert Taras.(Please look below)
Then there’s Goldberg Segalla who was representing defendants 1625 Emmons Ave, who allegedly , but according to court documents, and their own correspondences, including what is referenced above and is below agreed to pay-off, under the table, both Taras, Hamel/Dinkes & Schiwtzer allegedly, (yeah right!) so allowing and promoting Taras and Hamel/Dinkes & Schiwtzer to allegedly, (allegedly, oh right!) skim or more accurately allegedly, (allegedly, oh right!) steal from the settlement as the Daily News claims and as does the litigant as shown below: We and our colleagues at the Daily News,–and there are other newspapers that have profiled Hamel and Dinkes & Schwitzer regarding this same issue–Just google them, i.e., Law.com,–The New York Post, etc.
Oh and let us not leave out, Godosky & Gentile who may allegedly be defending them all.
So the litigant AND the Daily News claims that Hamel/Dinkes & Schiwtzer not only skimmed from the settlement but took bribes to do so, there is documented proof of such, (above), Hamel is guilty and confesses to engaging in bribery–Bribing a Public Servant.–Which allegedly definitely indicates bribery and skimming is the major element of their modus operandi, and yet it hasn’t occurred at all and certainly not in this case where there is documented evidence proving as much and worse? Hmmmmmmm. Hey, Kenneth “Roy Bean” Sherman, we can liken that to your alleged Alzheimer’s like, contrary to logic and honest thinking! And remember Ladies and Gentlemen of the public at large we’ve far more allegedly incriminating evidence against them.
We’ve heard tell that the proverbial gallows are in the ready as we have all waited for an explanation from Hamel/ and the Dinkes & Schiwtzer gang regarding taking paying offs from Plaintiff’s lawyers and have yet to get one. And let it be known, Dear Readers, WE HAVE NOT, AND ARE NOT, PUBLISHING ALL THE EVIDENCE AGAINST HAMEL/DINKES & SCHWITZER YET–AS A COURTESY TO THE LITIGANT! But we will at the right time. And, we promise we will give a blow by blow description of the proceedings for those of you who have emailed us telling us you can’t attend the above hearing.
And so why would Dinkes & Schiwtzer engage in a hearing where they allegedly can’t refute incriminating documented evidence?
There are two, reasons. One is, REVENGE, REVENGE, REVENGE.
It is the well known alleged (alleged, oh right!) misbegotten attitude of Hamel, (a cocky admitted criminal–Hamel had to plead guilty to facilitating a crime because he didn’t have a leg to stand on-otherwise and would’ve have been in for worse had he not), as well as the alleged misbegotten attitude of the alleged Dinkes & Schiwtzer clan, (not to meniton some other lawyers we’ve all come across) that clients should accept without question and questioning any type of (mal) treatment from them and if they do they are going to get it.
But revenge in this instance, is revenge upon the purveyor’s of such, i.e., the alleged Hamel /Dinkes & Schiwtzer gang as the price continues to rise exponentially. And to no avail with no end in sight but with them being on the alleged, (alleged, yeah right) brim of annihilation in court via evidence and extinction as a firm. They already begun to quickly unravel. Hmmmmm, can you imagine contributing to your own extinction.
The other is attrition. They are trying to “get”, (and perhaps we shouldn’t put quotation marks around the word because according to the litigant, Hamel and Jensen, allegedly, ((allegedly yeah right) had the litigant come to their office AFTER HOURS allegedly, (allegedly, yeah right!) inflicting threats).
We can say for sure that Hamel/Dinkes & Schiwtzer are going to try to take the offensive But they and their disreputableness that are at issue here and nothing else. We suspect they will underhandedly try to bring in anything extraneous–to save their skin, Newsflash Hamel/Dinkes & Schwtzer -it won’t work. And, if this “Special Referee” is honest, it certainly won’t work.
And let us add that we, and the rest of the public will not allow Hamel, –forced to admit to being the criminal that he is, and his alleged, (alleged yeah, right!), fellow criminals, to “get” the litigant in any way. We’ve heard tell that the litigant has been wisely advised to always tell the court that there is reason for the litigant to be fearful for the his/her safety given he/she is dealing with a hardend criminal, i.e. William Hamel, and his alleged (alleged, yeah right!), gang members, Bert Taras, Joelle Jensen, William Schwitzer, Raphael Otero of Goldberg Segalla, etc. etc. and whomever else Dinkes & Scwhitzer allegedly (allegedly, yeah right), have attempted to include in their allegedly , (allegedly, yeah right), illegal schemes. And aforementioned, it is Hamel and Dinkes & Schiwtzer who have been respectively guilty of criminal activity and allegedly, (allegedly, yeah right) associated with same. (please click on link below:
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD