William Hamel And Dinkes & Schwitzer: Alleged Malpractice And Departmental Disciplinary Committee Defense, (DDC), Attorney Office In Same Building As: By Coincidence Or By Contrivance, Coincidence, And Conflict Of Interest?– We Think the Latter Three- Part 3- Open Letter To The Disciplinary Committee
September 24, 2013 § Leave a comment
Dear Honest Lovers of the Legal Profession and Devotees of our Blog,
We have gotten yet another comment from our many followers who has sent us this comment below. We think it is so important that even though it refers back to an article published 4/26/13, we are continuing the series with this, part 3:
Here is the comment:
Based upon information and belief, Robert Godosky is a member of the “N.Y. Departmental Disciplinary Commitee.” His law firm is tied directly to Chairman Roy Reardon of Simpson and Thacher. The members enjoy private practice yet have government status – this is were the corruption begins. You may be interested to know, Mr. Reardon and Simpson Thacher has been retained by Godosky & Gentile in cases where attorneys were accused of misconduct by other attorneys. I would imgaine if you dig deeper into the story, you would find your lawyer was protected. Don’t expect much help from the Manhattan D.A., his father was a partner for Simpson Thacher and members of the DDC enjoy free legal reimbursement from the AG – so, yes, a lawyer can be accused of a crime and use the “right” people to avoid justice with this “watchdog” agency. Until the public demands Roy Reardon’s removal for allowing this system of influence peddling to cease the conflicts of interests, the people and honest lawyers will be unjustly burdened so they can enjoy the high life.”
Indeed Robert Godosky is a member of the DDC. The photo are in the public domain of the internet, (Need we remind anyone that it is mightier than the sword!), and can be found at this link:
If you look at the second row it’s the 2nd name from the top. There you Robert Godosky! We cannot say that we know for sure about veracity of the other allegations but since both names are prominently displayed on the DDC link.
In terms of William Hamel, (he and Dinkes & Schwitzer were never our lawyers–and never will be, thank goodness! And as far as being protected–we can verify that Hamel and Dinkes & Schwtizer are definitely being protected.