Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, The Same Judge Who Tried To Covertly Dispose Of Case Behind Litigant’s Back Is Allegedly Continuing To Disseminate Incorrect Information Misinforming The Public

January 2, 2014 § Leave a comment

Dear Readers,

Our sources have told us that Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman as he’s known now in all quarters, is allegedly, (Uh-huh) in charge of what is posted on the internet regarding this case.-We are still at a loss as to why when this case has been referenced to a Special Referee in an Evidentiary Hearing.–Remember, Roy Bean, everyone? he’s the one who underhandedly and illegally we might add, (Ladies and Gentlemen, as he, Roy Bean Sherman tried to conceal his action  as the litigant knew nothing about this behind-the-scenes Order, we are posting below. Had it not been for some investigative work, and the honest, and helpful, people at the Courthouse, we and the litigant would never have known), tried to dispose of the case we’ve been profiling for almost 3 years now stealthily from the litigant.–need we state, whatever goes on, in or about a case, ALL PARTIES are supposed to be privy to–especially when a Judge comes down with an Order:

Kenneth P. "Roy Bean" illegal, behind- the- scenes Order that the litigant only found out about because of the honest efforts of some staff at the Courthouse and investigative work of our colleagues and staff Photo Courtesy of world-News-Media.com

Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” illegal, behind- the- scenes Order that the litigant only found out about because of the honest efforts of some staff at the Courthouse and investigative work of our colleagues and staff Photo Courtesy of world-News-Media.com

Please notice that this says, “THIS CASE IS DISPOSED”!–Well Since when? Please notice the 1st line under “ADDED” it says “KPS”–Which stands for Kenneth P. Sherman–(The latter spells his name wrong-he leaves out the “Roy Bean”!), this document means that,  Judge, (Uh-huh) Sherman, and only Judge Sherman ordered this. We invite him to rebut the documented facts. Well, where’s your rebuttal, Roy Bean?

We might add that no other reference to such a disposal on the grounds that “WHEREBY NEW COUNSEL (Counsel for a/the litigant that the former never agreed to!)  SHALL MAKE A MOTION TO RESTORE  THIS MATTER TO THE CALENDAR. AT THIS POINT THE CASE IS DISPOSED”

We will add that what does a “NEW COUSEL” have to do with “MARKING -OFF” a case so that there  has to be  a “RESTORE TO THE CALENDAR”? Hey, “Roy Bean” Sherman? What’s that you say?  We welcome your rebuttal Roy…..

Well, be that as it may, Old Roy Bean Sherman is allegedly up to his old tricks again. From what we’ve heard he is in charge of posting the correct information regarding appearances–for the future and certainly in the past.

We are constantly finding discrepancies, (that’s a euphemistic way of putting it!)- Of course wrongdoings, is a better way to put it for this case–but then it’s easy as there are so many that are further rampant in this case. –But then look at the players: William Hamel, Dinkes & Schiwtzer, Godosky & Gentile,  “Roy Bean”  Sherman and we are still counting the ways:

Please take a gander at this:

Notice how this Court Detail of Motions erroneously reflects the events at the proceedings of this case and the wrongful posting of information goes back to the allegedly craven commissions of Roy Bean Sherman as he is allegedly in charge, of forwarding information to the ecourts website. Photo courtesy of World-News-Media.com

Notice how this Court Detail of Motions erroneously reflects the events at the proceedings of this case and the wrongful posting of information goes back to the allegedly craven commissions of Roy Bean Sherman as he is allegedly in charge, of forwarding information to the ecourts website.
Photo courtesy of World-News-Media.com

The above refers to the discrepancy we pointed out several weeks ago regarding the Subpoena that was issued and filed for the testimony of William Hamel. If you all recall,  we said that the Plaintiff filed the Subpoena–In the above Court Detail it erroneously states that the Plaintiff sought to quash the Subpoena when in fact it is on record that the Plaintiff filed it!

Ladies and Gentlemen, this has STILL Not been corrected.

We ask you are they claiming that there was an appearance date that the litigant was not informed of so that everyone was there except for the litigant making this referenced, (below), date a clandestine court date–Something else again covert and kept secret from the litigant?

Now we have made and taken issue with these discrepancies before. And, we know why Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, (KPS!), has allegedly, (uh-huh), fiddled with the records–among the ways being to misinform the massive public that comprises our Readership.  But “Roy Bean” your alleged efforts to misinform the public are futile and thwarted again and will continue to be.

By the way, guys, (the guys we refer to and are addressing are the guys that comprise the content of our articles, i.e. Willaim Hamel, Dineks & Schwitzer, Godosky & Gentile, etc.,)  it has come to our attention –in fact it has come to our attention several times that the aforementioned, don’t like us posting our articles.

Well  Newsflash:-If you don’t like the content of our articles, you shouldn’t have given us the fodder to post in them!

THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, The Same Judge Who Tried To Covertly Dispose Of Case Behind Litigant’s Back Is Allegedly Continuing To Disseminate Incorrect Information Misinforming The Public at world-news-media.com.

meta

%d bloggers like this: