News Bulletin: Godosky & Gentile, Defense Attorneys For Admitted Criminal William Hamel and Dinkes & Schwitzer, Send Letter To An Administrative Judge Of Kings County Court House of Horrors, Involving Him, To Allegedly Influence The Events And The Outcome Of This High Profile Case
February 11, 2014 § Leave a comment
To Our Dear Readership,
News Bulletin: Did you know, that if you’re unhappy with the way your case is going, or if you think you just might lose the case, or, if you don’t feel like participating/showing up for Court, or, even if you don’t like producing the full file to your client, –(which by the way, all lawyers are legally bound to do), all ya’ need do is send a letter to an Administrative Judge, in this case Administrative Judge Knipel, and, Voila!; if you are Godosky & Gentile, Dinkes & Schiwtzer, Lawyer William Hamel of latter firm who is also Confessed and Convicted Criminal William Hamel,– Forced to Admit he committed crimes, because he was caught in the midst of committing them, and is yet allegedly (Right, allegedly!), still practicing at Dinkes & Schiwtzer William Hamel and of course our Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, you just might get your way.
And we can’t discount the possibility of such things as the achievement of getting yourself unassigned to/from a case by simply dispatching same epistle to higher Judge at the New York Court of your choice, in this instance that being the Kings County Supreme Court, be you members of the firm of Godosky & Gentile, Dinkes & Schwitzer, and the latter’s Admitted and alleged star, Criminal , William Hamel, (Alleged; uh-huh.).
Let’s look at the facts and compare them with this outlandish epistle, (and by the way, boys, we’re delighted to assist you in your endeavours by posting this!):
#1: The Index # of the Case is 22335/2003
#2: Dinkes & Schwitzer did not prosecute the case at hand and if they did why would they need to try to.
#3: The litigant has said on record many times on record, she was forced to sign the settlement papers and in fact did so under duress.
#4:And if that’s not so, boys, why on earth would you have to compel someone to sign any papers when in fact
#5:Dinkes & Schwitzer, (D&S), and in fact anyone, is NOT entitled to any monies they do not and did not earn–In fact the audacity to even suggest such a thing.
#5:Boys and Girls of Godosky & Gentile, (G&G), Dinkes & Schwitzer, Criminal William Hamel, “Roy Bean” Sherman, we have proof that G&G were involved way before 2012, (We’ll be pleased to show references to such-anytime), and further we’ll show that G&G have defended Dinkes & Schiwtzer in alleged (Right!), Malpractice cases–Any other time!–Hey Dinkes & Schiwtzer, how many times have you been sued for Malpractice? We would await your answer, but we think your response might be too lengthy.
Administrative Judge Knipel, you are now, and will always be, associated with Confessed Criminal William Hamel, Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, Dinkes & Schwitzer and their attorneys, Godosky & Gentile whose member lawyer, Robert Godosky just happens to be a member of the DDC thanks to all the latter, who due to their alleged, (uh-huh), lack of virtue, have involved you. We here at W-N-M.com do not envy you your friends. And, we will not hesitate to post the second page of this letter if you boys so desire. You know we are that kind of accommodating.
Given the facts, Dear Readers is this corruption? You decide.
And we thought we would remind Administrative Judge Knipel about the fine the above, Criminal, paid:
Hey, Hamel, is the above amount the funds you earned from your involvement in criminal activities? Did you claim these funds on your taxes? Why don’t you contact us with a rebuttal? We’ll be pleased to print and post.
So to our Audience, we suggest that if you have a case pending in the NY Kings County Supreme Court, and you are Godosky & Gentile, Criminal William Hamel, Dinkes & Schiwtzer, Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, and have any dissatisfaction regarding the activities, take to your computers, pen to paper/cartridge to printer, click and send to the Administrative Judge. And perhaps, you’ll get him to rule the way you want and, he’ll hold sway in your favor!
Now of course what could possible occur given that Godosky sent the above letter. Let’s see, since the letter specifically mentions the records that were subpoenaed could their production in Court be effected by the request in the letter above?
Here is the subpoena
The Subpoena pointedly demands Criminal Hamel’s appearance as well as the records on the case–and in full.
And here is the Court Decision/Order in response, Ironically, a client doesn’t even need to get a Court Order to obtain the records for his or her case:
And yet lawyers are legally bound by law to produce the file in full at the request of the client but the Special Referee says she will ask for them as her discretion.–Unusual.
We add that Hamel has yet to show up on THREE, (3), occasions in fact has never shown up violating the law, violating the above Order, and has never been sanctioned or punished. When in fact EVERYONE must answer a Subpoena.
Dear Readers, why don’t you pass judgment.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD