UPDATED News Bulletin: Alleged Direct Connection Cited Between Letter Godoskys Sent To Administrative Judge Knipel To Influence High Profile Case And Criminal Hamel’s Disobedience Of Subpoena/Contempt of Court Hearing
February 11, 2014 § Leave a comment
We’ve an Update to yesterday’s News bulletin–(The original is below).
Ladies and gentlemen, there seems to be a direct correlation between the outrageous letter sent to Administrative Judge Knipel from Robert Godosky, alleged dues/funds collecting member of the Disciplinary Committee–If this guy is not allegedly funds collecting alone, then he is allegedly doing so and adding influence peddling. * And, Robert Godosky writes a letter to the Admisitrative Judge of the Court to impact on yet another case he is working on too.
*Let’s look at the facts. As we have profiled below Godosky & Gentile are defending Dinkes & Schwitzer in Malpractice cases, the High Profile case we have been citing,–adn Robert Godosky just happens to be a member of the DDC? We are immense doubting Thomas’ on this one.
Nonetheless, let’s take a look at the letter to Judge Knipel below as well as the Court Order/Decision of Special Referee Sunshine who is an incidental figurehead allegedly doing the bidding in this case doing of her criminal colleagues such as Known, Confessed, Criminal Hamel, and the other alleged ones at Dinkees & the Shysters–whoops! We do mean, Dinkes & Schwiter.
Robert Godosky, –(one of those Godoskies), sent the above missive to Administrative Judge Knipel regarding case Index#22335/03. (the Godoskies apparently–confuse numbers as the Index Number that they cite is inaccurate). iN any event, Robert Godosky notes his immense dissatisfaction to records being produced and the litigant’s ability to have enough time to examine them.
Well, the Litigant filed a Subpoena for the appearance/testimony/and records of Confessed Criminal Hamel. Well let’s look at the Subpoena and Special Referee Sunshine’s response to the Subpoena:
This subpoena is really quite clear. Let’s look at the court Order in response to this Subpoena:
Lookee up there! The Special Referee doesn’t even mention Hamel by name. Special Referee Sunshine are you afraid of the consequences of mentioning Hamel’s name because the Shyter’s of 1/2 the firm of the same name, Dinkes & Schwitzer/Shyster, or the DDC or Knipel is gonna get ya’?
–Dear Audience we must inform you that there is absolutely no coincidence that Dinkes & Schwitzer is incredibly similar to dinkies and Shyster–Surely the Legal fates had a hand in that one!
We have news for the Special Referee Sunshine. This is not sports. This is not a Sports arena. Lawyers are bound by law to give up the records in full to the client as those records belong to the client. There’s no need for a subpoena for the records. So we must tell you, Special Referee, you have quite a lot of audacity with your response to the above subpoena which , of all things LIMITS the access to the records to the client stating that the client may get them at your discretion.
Special Referee sunshine, what laws do you function under? Law by numbers? We inquire as you also have allowed Criminal Hamel to skip out on the Subpoena thus far 3 times. Special Referee Sunshine, we feel we must inform you, as pursuant to the laws of the United States of America, and those of one of the included states in the Union, that is, New York, EVERYONE MUST OBEY A SUBPOENA.
And we will even further qualify and fortify that statement with this: Even when the Godoskys write a letter to Administrative Judge of Kings County Court House, Lawrence Knipel asking for the contrary- (or allegedly asking for anything behind the scenes), even if you cater to the whimsy of Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, even if Robert Godosky is an alleged dues-taking member of the DDC, even if you like know Dinkes & Schwitzer are your collegues and even if you know and approve of Convicted Confessed Criminal Hamel and his crimes:
EVERYONE MUST OBEY A SUBPOENA
Moreover, we definitely see no coincidence Dinkes & Schwitzer’s lawyers Godosky & Gentile would have the audacity to write a letter to the higher Judge, i.e., Administrative Judge Lawrence Knipel–with the help of, no other than Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, and with the additional utterance of “abracadabra” that a subpoena is not only violated–Dinkes & Schiwtzer have refused to produce the records in full, as well as Criminal Hamel violating the Subpoena on two fronts not producing the non-existent records and skipping out on it and the fact that there have been no repercussions.
We will inform these players that the world is watching with disgust and is not being idle about it.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD
To Our Dear Readership: News Bulletin: Did you know, that if you’re unhappy with the way your case is going, or if you think you just might lose the case, or, if you don’t feel like participating/showing up for Court, or, even if you don’t like producing the full file to your client, –(which by the way, all lawyers are legally bound to do), all ya’ need do is send a letter to an Administrative Judge, in this case Administrative Judge Knipel, and, Voila!; if you are Godosky & Gentile, Dinkes & Schiwtzer, Lawyer William Hamel of latter firm who is also Confessed and Convicted Criminal William Hamel,– Forced to Admit he committed crimes, because he was caught in the midst of committing them, and is yet allegedly (Right, allegedly!), still practicing at Dinkes & Schiwtzer William Hamel and of course our Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, you just might get your way.
And we can’t discount the possibility of such things as the achievement of getting yourself unassigned to/from a case by simply dispatching same epistle to higher Judge at the New York Court of your choice, in this instance that being the Kings County Supreme Court, be you members of the firm of Godosky & Gentile, Dinkes & Schwitzer, and the latter’s Admitted and alleged star, Criminal , William Hamel, (Alleged; uh-huh.).
Let’s look at the facts and compare them with this outlandish epistle, (and by the way, boys, we’re delighted to assist you in your endeavours by posting this!):
#1: The Index # of the Case is 22335/2003
#2: Dinkes & Schwitzer did not prosecute the case at hand and if they did why would they need to try to.
#3: The litigant has said on record many times on record, she was forced to sign the settlement papers and in fact did so under duress.
#4:And if that’s not so, boys, why on earth would you have to compel someone to sign any papers when in fact
#5:Dinkes & Schwitzer, (D&S), and in fact anyone, is NOT entitled to any monies they do not and did not earn–In fact the audacity to even suggest such a thing.
#5:Boys and Girls of Godosky & Gentile, (G&G), Dinkes & Schwitzer, Criminal William Hamel, “Roy Bean” Sherman, we have proof that G&G were involved way before 2012, (We’ll be pleased to show references to such-anytime), and further we’ll show that G&G have defended Dinkes & Schiwtzer in alleged (Right!), Malpractice cases–Any other time!–Hey Dinkes & Schiwtzer, how many times have you been sued for Malpractice? We would await your answer, but we think your response might be too lengthy.
- Influence Peddling at its worst: This is just Page 1 of a letter, (Hey boys, we will be particularly thrilled to be oblige you by posting the rest of this letter full of falsehoods and mischaracterizations if you do so please!) Photo Courtesy of
Administrative Judge Knipel, you are now, and will always be, associated with Confessed Criminal William Hamel, Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, Dinkes & Schwitzer and their attorneys, Godosky & Gentile whose member lawyer, Robert Godosky just happens to be a member of the DDC thanks to all the latter, who due to their alleged, (uh-huh), lack of virtue, have involved you. We here at W-N-M.com do not envy you your friends. And, we will not hesitate to post the second page of this letter if you boys so desire. You know we are that kind of accommodating.
Given the facts, Dear Readers is this corruption? You decide.
- William Hamel’s Mugshot taken from the public record. Ladies and Gentleman of the public , as you all know, you can still find this in the files of the Bronx Supreme- Criminal Term. Just ask for Docket # 4794-09 . Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com
And we thought we would remind Administrative Judge Knipel about the fine the above, Criminal, paid:
- William Hamel’s $300K Fine paid in the form od a Bank Check as the Government does not trust him–as well they shouldn’t! The amount of the check should demonstrate the seriousness of William Hamel’s crimes. Thank goodness for our court sources. (Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media)
Hey, Hamel, is the above amount the funds you earned from your involvement in criminal activities? Did you claim these funds on your taxes? Why don’t you contact us with a rebuttal? We’ll be pleased to print and post.
- Dinkes & Schiwtzer -one of their many “alleged” Malpractice cases that Godosky & Gentile defended them against. Photo Courtesy world-news-media.com
So to our Audience, we suggest that if you have a case pending in the NY Kings County Supreme Court, and you are Godosky & Gentile, Criminal William Hamel, Dinkes & Schiwtzer, Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, and have any dissatisfaction regarding the activities, take to your computers, pen to paper/cartridge to printer, click and send to the Administrative Judge. And perhaps, you’ll get him to rule the way you want and, he’ll hold sway in your favor!
Now of course what could possible occur given that Godosky sent the above letter. Let’s see, since the letter specifically mentions the records that were subpoenaed could their production in Court be effected by the request in the letter above?
Here is the subpoena
The Subpoena pointedly demands Criminal Hamel’s appearance as well as the records on the case–and in full.
And here is the Court Decision/Order in response, Ironically, a client doesn’t even need to get a Court Order to obtain the records for his or her case:
- Special Referee’s Court Decision/Order denying the Motion to Quash filed by the Godoskies, (Godosky & Gentile), for Criminal Hamel’s appearance and for the file, but allows the latter to coincidentally get away with not producing the whole file per their similar request in their letter to Administrative Judge Knipel Photo Courtesy World-News-Media.com
And yet lawyers are legally bound by law to produce the file in full at the request of the client but the Special Referee says she will ask for them as her discretion.–Unusual.
We add that Hamel has yet to show up on THREE, (3), occasions in fact has never shown up violating the law, violating the above Order, and has never been sanctioned or punished. When in fact EVERYONE must answer a Subpoena.
Dear Readers, why don’t you pass judgment.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD