Special Referee Sunshine Alleged Illegal And Deliberate Abuse Of Litigant And The System Revealed As Litigant Requests Emergency Adjournment, Is Refused, Allegedly Proving Sunshine’s Illegal Premeditated Preferential Protection Of Convicted Criminal William Hamel Whom She Allowed To Violate Subpoena And Her Own Court Order For Same Scot Free: Corruption!
February 19, 2014 § Leave a comment
Alleged intentional maltreatment of Litigant ongoing as Special Referee Sunshine Allegedly Continues To Work Under Auspices Of Kenneth Roy Bean Sherman
WHEN A LITIGANT IS PREVENTED FROM PROSECUTING HIS CASE YOU KNOW THAT THE POWERS THAT BE ARE CORRUPT:
We’ve got more news in this court room soap opera for you! As we have explained on many prior occasions, the litigant in this matter is pro se, thus not a solo practitioner or part of any attorney conglomerate. The litigant is also disabled.
The story: The litigant filed and served a Subpoena for among other people, Known, Admitted and Convicted Criminal of Criminal Facilitation born out of the committing of Federal Crimes, that of Bribery of a Public Servant, William Hamel, who as far as we know is still practicing as an attorney with impunity——-But is doing so because of corruption, and not because the Departmental Disciplinary Committee is working as the watchdog organization it claims to be.
Just like the OAG, the Litigant has humongous amounts of evidence that Hamel and Dinkes & Schwitzer engaged in Bribery.—We have seen it!
We can tell you all that the immediately above, are all still shredding!
Because, Kenneth P., a/k/a KP, a/k/a “Roy Bean” Sherman, couldn’t quell the aforementioned tons of evidence, allegedly no matter how hard he tried, while being trying just the same (we put the word “allegedly” in italics once again as Kenneth Roy Bean Sherman, despite countless pleas that the litigant’s motion be put in the public record while he was overseeing the case he continued to keep the records in his chambers).
We proudly state as a consequence of our articles, Kenneth Roy Bean Sherman allegedly got so scared that he put the case in the hands of his alleged puppet the Special Referee, Miriam Sunshine, who is now presiding over the evidentiary Hearing.
The litigant subpoenaed William Hamel months ago— who NEVER SHOWED UP TO COURT —like any of us, law abiding, non-criminals, would have been compelled to do, with the illegal approval of Ms. Sunshine, the latter in fact allowing this to go on for lo those many months without sanctions, forcing the disabled litigant to appear in court unnecessarily 3 times making an hour’s trip for nothing while Criminal William Hamel, and Dinkes & Schwitzer were allowed to flout the law without recriminations.
As a matter of fact as we have previously posted, she finally came down with a Court Order demanding Hamel appear in Court as she denied the Godoskies, Motion to Quash regarding it and Criminal Hamel still didn’t appear! And Sunshine did nothing.
In the meantime, the litigant filed an Order to Show Cause for Contempt of Court–of course!
However, the disabled litigant, who as we mentioned is pro se, had requested an emergency adjournment; Ms. Sunshine, in all her lack of wisdom by refusing to respond to emails making such requests, has proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, where her alleged illegal allegiance lies. (And actually has before this incident allegedly did so as well.)–Something we will elaborate on in our next entry.The fact that the litigant has gotten no response means that he must show up to court in an illegal Hearing in front of a Judge Kurtz who shouldn’t even be on the case, (Please notice that Sunshine’s name is present in the 1st document, which is the way it should be but who’s name is blanked out with a “Judge” Kurtz’s name is illegally written in longhand over it without any initialing which actually invalidates such document as is), as the flighty and in absentia, in many ways, Sunshine has allegedly told the litigant that she, Sunshine, doesn’t get word on the case despite the fact that she, Sunshine, has access to the Court’s internal website as well as to e-courts as the rest of us do.–Are we expected to believe such a claim? If so we do not subscribe to such expectations.
Be that as it may, with these new developments, we will say that, Ms. Sunshine, you were warned if you abuse the litigant it would appear in print and posted. We will not allow any member of the Court to abuse any litigants and that goes ‘tripley” for the abuse of the disabled ones..
After all, this Special Referee, the flibbertigibbet that she is, Ms. Sunshine, is the same one who after she came down with her court Order denying the Robert Godosky’s Motion to Quash the Hamel Subpoena, then said on record that she was allowing anyone from Dinkes & Schwitzer to testify in Hamel’s place which, as if we must inform everyone reading this, is illegal. We ask all of you, when have you ever heard of the target of a subpoena, or the Court Officer overseeing such, that someone can testify in place of the person subpoena.–NEVER!
Now Dearest Readers, firstly, once a court Order is filed it cannot be reversed or revoked and in terms of the latter, can only be so by a higher court, and legally the Special Referee, Sunshine, cannot change her mind.
And on record, when the Litigant confronted Sunny, as to how such a thing could happen when in fact it was one week between the time Sunny came down with the aforementioned Decision, which was 9/23/13 and the next Court date, which was 10/1/13, Sunny was wordless, then grappled for some saying that (paraphrased), that was her recollection Yet Sunny said, grappling for words trying to explain this ridiculous illegality, to the Litigant, “It’s my recollection,” (that she conducted herself in this illegal manner, i.e., coming down with a Court Order then defying it!)–Special Ref. Sunshine, was that supposed to be an excuse and Ms. sunshine did you think you wouldn’t be caught and it wouldn’t be posted? And are we supposed to believe your “recollection”?–We don’t you know, and it’s posted!
Way beyond that and in reality, no one can decide who will substitute for another on a subpoena, only the subpoenaed person must obey and appear,. So when we call Ms. Sunshine a flibbertigibbet, we have good reason to!
Additionally, Dear Readers, we knew that the possibility of a refusal of the litigant’s request for an emergency adjournment, and for fair treatment, might be denied–for no reason other than for those emanating out of wrongdoing. So we forewarned the litigant to email Ms. Sunshine telling her that if such thing occurs the incident will be posted.–The litigant did so and we are keeping our word.
To our Readers,if there is any question at all we will say that, it is the Litigant’s or anyone’s right to post anything she or they so desire on the internet, including this case, which is not a sealed case and as importantly, on public record.
To you Ms. Sunshine, you have now established yourself as someone who is in print and not in complementary terms,–but that is, and that has been, your decision. And with this antic, you have just buried yourself deep in the corruption and criminality of this case going down in the annals of the history of it as well of that of the Kings County Court House of Horrors and have demonstrated that any Decision, Order, judgment made by you or any other higher up, not in favor of the litigant is tainted by that corruption.
Dear Readers, there is no excuse for maltreatment of the Litigant, for treating her unfairly, and especially when you consider that the same Sunshine who has denied an emergency adjournment is the same one who illegally allowed Criminal Hamel to get away with flouting both the Subpoena and her own Order.
We can say and do, that there has been a concerted effort to quell the evidence that the Litigant has against Convicted Criminal William Hamel and his alleged co-conspirators at Dinkes & Schwitzer and of course let us not leave out the Godoskies & Gentile, by all the latter and the Litigant’s right to tell and present it. The Litigant, as does any litigant has the right and is entitled to tell his story. And the more the Kenneth P. Roy Bean Sherman’s and Special Referee Sunshine’s try to prevent such the more easily we will find to post the situation.
We will emphasize that not only did Sp. REf. Sunshine try to get away with not sanctioning Hamel for appearing for the Subpoena 3—- THREE — times, but she also wouldn’t allow the Litigant to obtain the records in full which Dinkes & Schwitzer and Forced to Confess Criminal because he was caught in the commission of the crime, William Hamel have refused to provide. Please see below:
We ask all of you, how can ANYONE prepare for a case without the full records. Knowing this, Sunshine has denied the litigant the records, an emergency adjournment, while letting Criminal Hamel,–who just happens to be her colleague, to violate the law–and many times!
Furthermore, When the Litigant made the request for an emergency adjournment, the Godokies vehemently objected to such making false claims. Apparently that was Ms. Sunshine’s cue to disallow such even though such a denial was and is patently unfair as Sunshine has worked in favor of the Defendants.
Point in fact, Hamel’s subpoena. The Litigant was forced to file and serve a subpoena! But the Flibbertigibbety Ms. Sunshine, Specially biased Referee that she is instead of insisting that Hamel appear and sanctioning him for not doing so, Guess What? Ms.Flibberty ordered the Litigant to the witness stand and had her testify as an unfriendly witness, (having no choice, the Litigant went up on the stand) Ms. Sunshine without demanding the Litigant be Subpoenaed thereby quelled the civil rights of the Litigant.
Flibberty–not to be confused with liberty as the latter has nothing to do with it—demands that a layperson is held to a higher standard than the professionals who have the criminality, the health, the criminal means, schooling and experience ,thus then by rights it is supposed to be the reverse.
Ms. Sunshine in the Court of Public Opinion which includes our opinion, there is absolutely no excuse for your actions other than corruption and we have no sympathy for you. We feel that we all gave you plenty of leeway and chances to prove yourself honest, as opposed to being the alleged marionette of Dinkes & Schwitzer, Proved Criminal William Hamel, and Kenneth P. Roy Bean Sherman, but you have thwarted us in our every effort, (Really, denying your own Court Order a week after it was signed, and allowing Hamel to violate that AND the Subpoena violating the law, AND claiming you are allowing them to cherry-pick whom they wanted to testify in his place, AND, demanding the Litigant give testimony WITHOUT BEING SUBPOENAED), –
Hey Special Ref. Sunshine, What Bar did you pass? The one around the corner?
Ergo, if you want to take revenge on the Litigant for the posting of this very telling article, (any revenge would be illegal as well–and isn’t what you’ve done enough already?), for which you are very deserving, we must tell you it is her right to tell us the facts that are backed by documents,–we’ve seen them all,— so you want to dispute what we say–go right ahead, it is also our right to tell the public the facts that are strictly based on documentation.
And although we have through our extremely reliable sources have notified us that there has been revenge afoot by you, since that has thus far that has been the status quo so we’re not surprised in fact we are ready. As we’ve demonstrated in the past, any time there is revenge afoot we will tenaciously cover and post it!
Ms Sunshine we welcome your rebuttal but we honestly doubt you can come up with any legitimate one that can logically explain and respond to the facts which are the same as our claims, telling us why legally you have denied the Litigant fair treatment in any form,–and currently, in the form of an emergency adjournment, and in the past in all your wrongful actions enumerated in this article. You’ve no veracity at this point.
Dearest Readers, when a Litigant is deterred from bringing forth evidence then you know the powers that be are corrupt: We will continue to follow the events of this case even more diligently.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD