BOMBSHELL: COURT DOCUMENTS TAMPERED WITH AND FALSIFIED-ALLEGEDLY? Well, We’ve Got The Proof! BUT WHAT WE WANT TO KNOW IS WHO FALSIFIED THE DOCUMENTS????
February 19, 2014 § Leave a comment
Very simply Dear Readers, the document above is an illegal document. It refers to a court date already scheduled for an evidentiary Hearing, yet far more illegally please notice and know the “Judge Kurtz “name, it is on top of the whitened out name of Special Referee Sunshine. Whomever wrote “Judge Kurtz” should have initialed it unless he/she was doing it covertly. Look at the bottom half of the document. Those “fillins” are initialed. Thus, the only legal document is the one below:
Dear Dedicated Readers:The plot continues to thicken and our sources tell us that doouments have been deliberately falsified, in this high profile case Index number 22335/2003 in, where else, Kings County Court House (Of Horrors)–
This is the story. The litigant, per the orders of Special Referee Sunshine, (this is the Special Referee in Evidentiary Hearings assigned to this chapter of the case), or more accurately, per procedure, the litigant filed and served an Order to Show Cause, (OSC) for (Punishment) for Contempt of Court on both the court and the allegedly notorious, (allegedly, uh-huh), Godosky & Gentile, Robert of the first part of the latter is dues paying member, or allegedly and far more likely, alleged ” dues collecting” member for the Departmental Disciplinary Committee. (After all as we have posted in several of our articles, these guys allegedly have a vested interest in influencing the outcome of cases against their constant and apparently lifelong clients, who are constantly in trouble, Dinkes & Schiwtzer, and constantly in trouble with the law, Known Criminal guilty of Federal crimes against the public, William Hamel and benefit immensely by their membership in the DDC and its ties to the NY DA’s Office. Need we reiterate that the DDC is in the same building just steps from Godosky & Gentile’s office) So honest lawyers out there for future reference, we are giving you a caveat so that you do know that if Godosky & Gentile or Known Criminal William Hamel or anyone from dinkes & Schwitzer cheat you you won’t get fair treatment from the DDC.
Anyway, If a document is legally altered it is crossed out and initialed. No one has come forward saying that they have crossed out Special Referee Sunshine’s name nor will they. And we haven’t heard that anyone has come forward to say how they “coincidentally” made the date for the Punishment for the Contempt of Court Hearing for the same exact date as the already set appearance date–Nor will we!
We will say one thing and that is how and why would someone signing and approving the Punishment for Contempt of Court Hearing choose the same date as the originally set date for the next appearance, when there were plenty of days to choose in between the filing date and 2/19/14 unless they allegedly had ex parte communication with the Special Referee Sunshine and Kenneth Roy Bean Sherman.
As if that’s not bad enough, since the next appearance in court was already set for 2/19/14. How is it that the date for the Punishment for Contempt of Court date was not scheduled beforehand? Coincidence? We’ve got news for the dishonest powers: There are no coincidences!
Additionally, who is this Kurtz? It seems that the cowardly Kenneth P. Roy Bean Sherman has chickened out of this case by asking to be unassigned to it–if you recall Roy Bean, Godosky & Gentile, (G&G) Dinkes & Schwitzer, (D&S), Criminal Facilitator, Known Criminal William Hamel wrote administrative Judge Knipel a letter (see below) complaining that they didn’t like the events of the case–which in reality means that that didn’t like the fact that the untrained Litigant was winning!
Kenneth Roy bean Sherman, if you requested to be unassigned to this case as it seems you did, (See the Letter he had a hand in writing along with Godosky & Gentile below) we want to see that in writing as this is a case that is supposed to be on public record and any discussion of such things is supposed to be documented for the parties and given to the parties involved.
And what’s going on with the revolving door Judges which is something unfair thus unheard of? So that the litigant has to tell the story over and over again. We want to know who illegally altered the 1st document above? No one is coming forth to admit this alteration and adulteration of what is supposed to be a legal document. We want to know the laws that reinforce and verify such an action. We want to know how the court date for the Hearing for Punishment for Contempt of Court was scheduled for the same date and time as the original Court date –and yet in another room in front of another Judge!!!. We want to know.
We want to know why there are revolving door judges as if anyone other than Sunshine is presiding it unfortunately should be Roy bean.
We want to know who whited out her name–and illegally!
If Roy bean was unassigned to the case the Litigant should have been asked for her consent and or been notified as anything other than that is illegal ex parte communication.
We want to know.
We will inform the public that AFTER the OSC above was illegally crossed out/whited out, signed. and illegally approved, Roy Bean Sherman allegedly further put his dirty hands on the project by scheduling another Punishment for Contempt of Court Hearing for 1/28/14 which was AFTER the OSC for same was illegally crossed out/whitened out, and in fact that was the day the document was filed:
The Litigant was not made aware of this corrupt posting on ecourts until we discovered it. Wouldn’t you know that Roy Bean Sherman would have his allegedly filthy imput into something. –Why not on another falsified document? Well Kenneth P. Roy Bean Sherman you’ve been caught again and we’re not finished exposing you.
We guess you still want to fool around with us when you have no reputation to gamble with.
We want to know exactly what is going on.
We promise our Readership we will find out
We must inform the public as well as the players in this case we will find out.
And before we sign off, we are informing our audience that it is very obvious that these people will go to any illegal lengths to score a win. In our considered opinion, we consider them dangerous individuals–William Hamel was prosecuted on Federal crimes and allegedly no doubt associates with the criminal element–He confessed to criminal facilitation–so logically he must.
We, as supporters of the public’s safety, and as the litigant always signs the legal documents in the same vein, –in her situation she has repeatedly said “(sic) fears for her safety”, we advise the public to be very careful of these characters for their own safety.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD