Special Referee Sunshine, Allegedly, Just An Instrument of Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, Forced To Confess Because He Was Caught In Commission Of Crime, William Hamel, Dinkes & Schwitzer, and Their Defense Attorneys, Godosky & Gentile, As She Allegedly Acts In Same Vein As K.P. “Roy Bean” Sherman To The Alleged Coincidental Advantage Of Admitted Criminal William Hamel and Dinkes & Schwitzer! In Our Opinion, There Is No Other Way To Explain Sunshine’s Inexcusable Behavior
March 22, 2014 § Leave a comment
Dearest Devoted Readers,
According to our tremendously dependable Court Sources, –(not to leave out e-courts website: https://www.nycourts.gov/, our Special Referee Sunshine who was given the case by none other than our inimitable, Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, although supposedly new blood, is continuing in the same alleged illegal fashion as her predecessor, the same of course, Kenneth P. –or as he’s allegedly known about town, “Roy Bean” Sherman.
How strange since we had all hoped that Special Referee Sunshine had the temerity to act on her own, honestly with a conscience. Unfortunately, hopes can be dashed.
Instance in point, Forced to Confess as he was caught in the commission of crimes, William Hamel was Subpoenaed. Hamel NEVER showed up in court disobeying the subpoena at this point FOUR, (4), times.
Special Referee Sunshine, claimed in open court and on record, that as a Special Referee, she could not sanction Hamel for his defiance of not only the Subpoena but of Sunshine’s own Order boosting it.
Let us first show the the remedy for disobeying a Subpoena from
Let us remind our Readership that it was just ONE, (1) week after Sunshine wrote this Court Order, in fact it was on Oct.1, 2013 that she stated in open court and thusly, on record that ILLEGALLY, she was going to allow Dinkes & Schwitzer to “choose” whomever THEY would like to testify as opposed to Hamel, if they so choose! Need we further emphasize not only is this blatantly and pointedly illegal but this was AFTER Sunshine bolstered the Subpoena for Hamel’s appearance and it was ONE, (1), week after doing that to boot!!!
We shall ask some rhetorical questions here: Other than for reasons of illegality, what’s the purpose of subpoenaing someone if that person can pick who’s going to testify in his place? And Ms. Sunshine, what Bar Exam did you pass? Was it the one that emphasizes the support of criminality? Did you pull this because you thought that you would get away with it and that there were powers other than those exercised by your, in our opinion, puppeteers that would allow you or Hamel to get away with that? Or in other words, what the innocent, layperson litigant doesn’t know will hurt him? Is that the philosophy you are functioning under because if that is the situation, we will have immense pleasure of posting it.–We assure you.
We next want to highlight for the most recent appearance and the Order To Show Cause (OSC), that prompted and preceded it. In the content of the latter, the Litigant asked for relief, (the right of anyone submitting an OSC), among which was the request that the Court Order/Decision for this OSC be expedited. We’ve heard say that Ms. Sunshine was telling people she would come to a decision within a 2 week period–We alerted our contacts that that was not going to happen.
Ms. Sunshine, who in our view is the marionette that she is of the Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman regime, is going to take as long as possible to attempt to further disadvantage the litigant–The Proof is in the pudding as as of 3/20/14, she did not come don’t with any decision which is too well after 2 weeks.
We will add that in open court and again on record, Special Referee Sunshine said that she couldn’t sanction Hamel for his defiance of the Subpoena OR her Court Order. Well these are the facts and all of us individually and as a group, simply don’t know how she got your job if she doesn’t know the following law that states that a Special Referee to Determine has all powers that Judges do.law.justia.com (Article 43 – (4301 – R4321) TRIAL BY A REFEREE4301 – Powers of referee to determine.)
2012 New York Consolidated Laws
CVP – Civil Practice Law & Rules
Article 43 – (4301 – R4321) TRIAL BY A REFEREE
4301 – Powers of referee to determine.
Universal Citation: NY CPLR § 4301 (2012)
§ 4301. Powers of referee to determine. A referee to determine an issue or to perform an act shall have all the powers of a court in performing a like function; but he shall have no power to relieve himself of his duties, to appoint a successor or to adjudge any person except a witness before him guilty of contempt.
For the purposes of this article, the term referee shall be deemed to include judicial hearing officer.
So Special Referee, Ms. Sunshine, our opinion is that you are not other than, flagrantly working in favor and protection of Forced to Confess to Crimes, William Hamel, and Dinkes & Schwitzer.
Ms. Sunshine, we welcome any rebuttal from you. We ask if you want to rebut our assertions,–which are not assertions but are facts which are backed by documents and records you show us in writing, through documentation as well something otherwise. But as it stands right now you have no legitimate excuse for your behaviour.
As you have not allowed the layperson to lean on his ignorance of the law, in fact like your predecessor, you have taken advantage of it, ignorance of the law for you who are in the profession is absolutely no excuse.
We have given you much leeway and been very patient. Unfortunately, for you you have given us much fodder so we must conclude the above. It is on record that when confronted with the discrepancy between your Decision of 9/23/14 bolstering the Litigant’s Subpoena for Hamel’s appearance and testimony by said Litigant, and your statement ONE, (1), week later with your statements refuting and disputing it, you claimed that that was “your recollection” –The fact that you were going to illegally allow someone else to testify FOR Hamel! Ms. Sunshine, it’s simply not plausible–and neither are you.–Ladies and Gentlemen of the public jury, this is on record!
We can only say what exists in our society is guilt by action, by association, and by inaction. And Special Ref. Ms. Sunshine you fit the bill on all three fronts.
Dear Readers we will continue in our vein exposing judges and Special Referees of Kings County Court House of Horrors who violates the law who crosses our paths.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD