Update: William Hamel, Forced To Confess Guilt As He Was Caught In Commission Of Crime, Dinkes & Schwitzer, Godosky & Gentile, And Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, You May Have Allegedly Done Background Checks On Us, But The Public Is Allegedly Watching You Too
March 22, 2014 § Leave a comment
We will begin our article by saying that for the people, i.e., Hamel, Dinkes & Schwitzer, Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, Godosky & Gentile, Special Referee Sunshine, and the other alleged player i.e., Administrative Judge Knipel, the above of whom all have some connection to this case, no news coverage, is good news coverage.
Having said that, as we reported, we’ve gotten word that allegedly, the first four of the above mentioned parties have been named as reportedly doing background checks on us, the Journalists who write this blog, as well as the Litigant who has been prosecuting the case at hand, we’ve been profiling.
In response, and in overwhelming response we might add, we have found out that the public is watching the above mentioned –and not with positivity. We have been told that the above parties have allegedly been hiring more and more people to read and analyze our news pieces trying to figure out what to do.
The fact that since the Public is negatively cognitive of the aforementioned, we will say that if such people as Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, has any political aspirations, he may desire to move to another venue–on perhaps another planet. Our Readership is far-reaching, and if we must add international at this point. Neither us, nor anyone we know, nor know of, would vote for him.
Among the reasons, and in reference to the case we’ve been following, i.e. Index# 22335/2003, by Kenneth P.”Roy Bean” Sherman’s conspicuous and intentional show of bias, (i.e., the least of which was by deciding to appear an hour late, the same time Robert Godosky decided to show up while the litigant waited an hour for both for the Court appearance proving illegal ex parte contact), Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman reinforced his moniker as well as his destiny.—the future of which, will likely not be in politics!
In regard to Dinkes & Schwitzer, they, for the longest time have been fighting their clients, as opposed to fighting for their clients. The case we’ve been profiling, Index # 22335/2003 is a high-profile case and is one of many comprising a former client of Dinkes & Schwitzer’s/William Hamel’s fighting them for money owed to this past client by them, and whose claims and proof of those claims we have repeatedly posted. We solely believe the Litigant.
We welcome a rebuttal which we will post Criminal William Hamel, Dinkes & Schwitzer, Godosky & Gentile, and their comrade Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman.
We tell you, Dear Readers, and them, there is absolutely nothing they can do. They cannot shut us down. And we do not respond to scare tactics.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD