We Don’t Have To Hedge Our Bets: We Say “Roy Bean” Sherman Puppet, Special Referee Sunshine, Will Reach Decision Whether To Punish Admitted Criminal William Hamel, Now Guilty Of Violating Subpoena And Her Own Court Order Boosting It, Who’s By Law, Guilty Of Contempt Of Court For Doing So, As Well As For Other Relief Requested, As Close To Next Court Appearance As Possible To Allegedly To Help Hamel And Hinder Litigant Despite Requests For Expedited Decision-That’s Been Her M.O. So Far. We Don’t See Why She’d Change!

March 27, 2014 § Leave a comment

Dear Readers,

Our headline says it all.
Lets look at the facts.
1-Hamel was subpoenaed last summer. In fact he was subpoenaed last July 2013. (Subpoena below)

Affidavit of Service of Subpoena demanding William Hamel testimony and appearance violated by none other than William Hamel. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Affidavit of Service of Subpoena demanding William Hamel testimony and appearance violated by none other than William Hamel. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

There have been 4 (four) subsequent appearances. Admitted Criminal, William Hamel has deliberately failed to appear for all. Sunshine on record, when confronted about it during the 2/19/14 appearance, –when for the 4th time he didn’t appear, falsely claimed that she couldn’t sanction him when in fact by law Special Referees have the same powers that Judges do. The law reads as follows:

2012 New York Consolidated Laws
CVP – Civil Practice Law & Rules
Article 43 – (4301 – R4321) TRIAL BY A REFEREE
4301 – Powers of referee to determine.
Universal Citation: NY CPLR § 4301 (2012)
§ 4301. Powers of referee to determine. A referee to determine an issue or to perform an act shall have all the powers of a court in performing a like function; but he shall have no power to relieve himself of his duties, or to appoint a successor…..

For the purposes of this article, the term referee shall be deemed to include judicial hearing officer.

As if the above is not enough let us look at N.Y. Judicial Law § 754 : NY Code – Section 754

N.Y. JUD. LAW § 754 : NY Code – Section 754: SPECIAL PROCEEDING TO PUNISH FOR CONTEMPT PUNISHABLE CIVILLY

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/nycode/JUD/19/754#sthash.D87acwzW.dpuf
In a case specified in section seven hundred and fifty-three, or in any other case where it is specially prescribed by law, that a court of record, or a judge thereof, or a referee appointed by the court, has power to punish, by fine and imprisonment, or either, or generally as a contempt, a neglect or violation of duty, or other misconduct; and a right or remedy of a party to a civil action or special proceeding pending in the court, or before the judge or the referee, may be defeated, impaired, impeded, or prejudiced thereby, the offense must be punished as prescribed in the following sections of this article.
– See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/nycode/JUD/19/754#sthash.D87acwzW.dpuf

The Special Referee has also allegedly claimed that she doesn’t have access to ecourts and the court website–and on record. We find that rather hard to believe as everyone else has it.

Be that may, given the immense discrepancies between what is law, and the events that have occurred that are contrary to it, it is indubitable, that Special Referee Sunshine, who has thus far acted in the same manner as her predecessor, lengthening an already exceedingly long process and even exceedingly longer case, is under the thumb of Dinkes & Schwitzer, Admitted Criminal William Hamel and of course our Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman.

We might, in fact we do, take a special interest in the allegedly infamous Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, Ladies and Gentleman of the Public, (Jury), because, he had the ability and the power to act justly and halt these unnecessary proceedings long ago –proceedings that further take advantage of the innocent, in this instance the Litigant, (and from what we hear, this is now the first time) and how about the innocent taxpayers.

Instead, of doing what’s right he chose, –and foolishly we do add, to act dishonestly, in favor of his friends. Dinkes & Schwtizer and Admitted Criminal William Hamel.He obviously thought he wouldn’t get caught! But contrary to that fantasy, we post once again below, the public decision that was announced in court and the amazing documented and actual covert decision he ruled on behind the scenes that he tried to set in motion, (no pun intended) had it not been for some very savvy legal minds who discovered the illegalities of such action. This is something we will never forget nor will we allow Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman to forget either!

11/14/12 Kenneth P. "Roy Bean" Original Bogus  Court Order/Decision announced in Open Court only to be contradicted by actual Ruling for the same date  removing the case from active calendar behind the scenes and without the knowledge and permission of Litigant-Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com

11/14/12 Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Original Bogus Court Order/Decision announced in Open Court only to be contradicted by actual Ruling for the same date removing the case from active calendar behind the scenes and without the knowledge and permission of Litigant-Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com

Kenneth P. "Roy Bean" illegal, behind- the- scenes Order that the litigant only found out about because of the honest efforts of some staff at the Courthouse and investigative work of our colleagues and staff Photo Courtesy of world-News-Media.com

Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” illegal, behind- the- scenes Order that the litigant only found out about because of the honest efforts of some staff at the Courthouse and investigative work of our colleagues and staff Photo Courtesy of world-News-Media.com

Given the dishonest events that have been rampant during the course of this case, you would think that Special Referee Sunshine would make a concerted effort to make things right. –We can say she has not and as a matter of fact she’s done the reverse acting only in line with Roy Bean Sherman.

Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman” allegedly had a shaky reputation to begin with, and prior to overseeing this case. Kenneth P. “Roy Bean Sherman” is only known, according to very reliable sources in and out of the Court system and especially by the public, by this epithet, and will hence only be known as.

Sunshine as of this date, and as far as we know, has yet to rule on Admitted Criminal Hamel’s violation of the law on several fronts. We honestly originally tried to give her the benefit of the doubt and attempted to not hold her guilty by association. We can no longer indulge her alleged lack of appropriate behavior.

For Sunshine to rule that Hamel has violated the law, does not take over 1 1/2 months, when the events and documents prove he did so and she, by saying that, she couldn’t sanction him for doing so –in open court, means that she was cognizant that he is deserved of it. Add to that, Sunshine announced in open court that she would come down with a ruling on the matter within two, (2), weeks. Well sunshine you are way past that.

To conclude, we definitely believe that Special Referee Sunshine is the dupe of Roy Bean Sherman. And all we can say to that is look what happened to Roy Bean Sherman who is the alleged stooge of Dinkes & Schwitzer, Godosky & Gentile, and Admitted Criminal/Criminal Record, William Hamel. We don’t envy any of you your reported tainted reputations.

THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading We Don’t Have To Hedge Our Bets: We Say “Roy Bean” Sherman Puppet, Special Referee Sunshine, Will Reach Decision Whether To Punish Admitted Criminal William Hamel, Now Guilty Of Violating Subpoena And Her Own Court Order Boosting It, Who’s By Law, Guilty Of Contempt Of Court For Doing So, As Well As For Other Relief Requested, As Close To Next Court Appearance As Possible To Allegedly To Help Hamel And Hinder Litigant Despite Requests For Expedited Decision-That’s Been Her M.O. So Far. We Don’t See Why She’d Change! at world-news-media.com.

meta

%d bloggers like this: