1st Departmental Disciplinary Committee Chief Counsel, Jorge Dopico Ignore Complaints Against Preferred Lawyers And Law Firms Vehemently Discouraging Complaints Under Guise Of Protecting The Public, Even When Those Favored Lawyers And Law Firms, I.E., Confessed Criminal William Hamel Has Broken Criminal Laws And Dinkes & Scwitzer, His Law Firm, Has Allegedly Broken Criminal Laws: Obviously, Corruption at the DDC Is Allegedly Rampant!
March 31, 2014 § Leave a comment
1st Departmental Disciplinary Committee AND Chief Counsel, Jorge Dopico Ignore Complaints Against Preferred Lawyers And Law Firms Vehemently Discouraging Complaints Under Guise Of Protecting The Public, Even When Those Favored Lawyers And Law Firms, I.E., Confessed Criminal William Hamel Has Broken Criminal Laws And Dinkes & Scwitzer, His Law Firm, Has Allegedly Broken Criminal Laws: Obviously, Corruption at the DDC Is Allegedly Rampant!
We have posted the ridiculous response from DDC Chief Counsel, Jorge Dopico. Among the reasons the response is stupid is because the complaint,–which we’ve seen was leveled against, Criminal William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, William Schwitzer,–to name but a few, AND Dinkes & Schwitzer. If you look at the letter, it only mentions Dinkes & Schwitzer.
We also add that this dumb response was sent while Hamel, who was prominently mentioned in the original complaint to the DDC, was also at the time up on a bail amount paid to the OAG/government on Bribery Charges, specifically for Bribing A Public Servant–19 Felony Counts and battling such. The laws that these “lawyers” broke were enumerated very clearly in the complaint which included documents supporting the accusations.
The 1st DDC by habit, tells people that they can add to any complaints they may level.
Well we guess that’s allegedly true unless the complainant is complaining about Lawyers and law firms that break the law. DDC, we will be glad to post the proof of what we are saying if you guys post proof otherwise……
Furthermore, if you look at the date of this letter, June 2012, it is less than nine months prior to Criminal Record, Hamel’s Confession and Conviction not to mention during the time when Hamel was pleading innocence to the OAG’s Office and apparently just prior to the time that the DDC was prosecuting him–We put the word “prosecuting” here in italics because it must have been a lame prosecution, and simply a sham, when in fact there have been numerous complaints against Hamel, in addition to the government’s and criminal Record, Hamel is still, as far as we know, practicing.
So, Hamel confesses to crimes, among which are among those that would warrant prosecution by the DDC to punish Criminal Record Hamel in addition to his and his firm’s allegedly, (Allegedly, yeah right!) committing serious crimes and not only contrary to pattern and form does Jorge, tell the complainant that “We can be of no further assistance”
Since the letter we have posted disputes such a notion. We, on behalf of the public would like to know what is going on. Really, if the DDC claims that evidence from other sources cannot be brought in, guys that is in Criminal Law. So if there is any idea to tell the public that then, not to worry, we are watching out for the public, as opposed to the DDC and telling people, in our opinion, if anyone wants to hire, Dinkes & Schwtizer, and/or Criminal Facilitator, William Hamel, they are asking,–no demanding trouble. As in our opinion, Dinkes & Schwitzer, and attorneys therefrom, since it is the alleged pattern at that law firm, as well as Criminal Facilitator, William Hamel, will rob them blind.
Well, DDC, again, we will be pleased to accommodate you by publishing the original complaint enumerating the laws the above allegedly broke.
In the meantime, DDC, since we doubt you will advertise your alleged cronyism AND corruption by sending us a rebuttal, at least your alleged sham of a prosecution, and from our viewpoint, your violation of the public’s trust has been exposed.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD