44 Days Or Over A Month And A Half And Counting, Since Special Referee Sunshine’s Alleged Claim Of Taking Two, (2), Weeks To Decide Upon Simple OSC Which Includes Alleged Fugitive Lawyer With Criminal Record, William Hamel’s Fate, And While You’re Still Deciding Please Inform Us: What Law School Teaches Its Students That Anyone Can Choose Who Will Testify In Place Of Subpoenaed Person?–NONE!

April 4, 2014 § Leave a comment

Dear Readers,

Then again, Spec. Ref. Sunshine, what law school taught you that anyone can select who will testify in place of the subpoenaed person?

As we have been saying, right after Spec. Ref. came down with her one and only decision on this case, (a case that Roy Bean Sherman, allegedly, without necessity dragged out for years), that of 9/23/13 supporting The Litigant’s Subpoena demanding alleged fugitive Lawyer With Criminal Record, William Hamel, appearance and testimony. Both are below:

Affidavit of Service of Subpoena demanding William Hamel testimony and appearance violated by none other than William Hamel. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Affidavit of Service of Subpoena demanding William Hamel testimony and appearance violated by none other than William Hamel. Photo courtes of world-news-media.com

Special Referee's Court Decision/Order denying the Motion to Quash filed by the Godoskies, (Godosky & Gentile),  for Criminal Hamel's appearance ahd for the file, but allows the latter to get away with not producing the whole file per their request in their letter to Administrative Judge Knipel thus demanding the appearance to testify by William Hamel and the adherence not only by law and by the virtue of the Plaintiff's Subpoena but now also by court Order

Special Referee’s Court Decision/Order denying the Motion to Quash filed by the Godoskies, (Godosky & Gentile), for Criminal Hamel’s appearance ahd for the file, but allows the latter to get away with not producing the whole file per their request in their letter to Administrative Judge Knipel thus demanding the appearance to testify by William Hamel and the adherence not only by law and by the virtue of the Plaintiff’s Subpoena but now also by court Order

.

In her subsequent statements, Spec. Ref. Sunshine proclaimed that she had “directed” that Dinkes & Schwtizer, could choose who they wanted to testify in the place of Lawyer with a Criminal Record, Hamel! As members of the public as well as the media Laypeople, and Law students, alike, we would like to know precisely what law school teaches its students that anyone, (in this instance, Dinkes & Schiwtzer or Hamel or attorneys representing them, or for that matter, anyone), can choose who can testify in the place of the subpoenaed person?

When confronted about this allegedly crazy proclamation, Spec. Ref. Sunshine was politely confronted by the Litigant asking when, if she came down with her decision on 9/23/13 and the next court date was 10/1/13 when did she direct it. We will go 2 further by asking, what law school teaches its students that it is in accordance with the law that anyone overseeing a case to claim that anyone can pick who will testify on a subpoena for a specific person?

As far as we and the rest of those who are honest in the profession know, no law school!

We might add that this is not a sealed case, it is a public one. With that said, if there is nothing wrong with the activities and the events that have been taking place in this case, then the players should have no objections to our posting them and our opinions of them!

THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading 44 Days Or Over A Month And A Half And Counting, Since Special Referee Sunshine’s Alleged Claim Of Taking Two, (2), Weeks To Decide Upon Simple OSC Which Includes Alleged Fugitive Lawyer With Criminal Record, William Hamel’s Fate, And While You’re Still Deciding Please Inform Us: What Law School Teaches Its Students That Anyone Can Choose Who Will Testify In Place Of Subpoenaed Person?–NONE! at world-news-media.com.

meta

%d bloggers like this: