BOMBSHELL: Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman And Special Referee Miriam Sunshine Reportedly Pass The Torch For Obstruction Of Justice On Case They Allegedly Rigged For Lawyer Pals To 2nd Dept. Appellate Division Judges, To Carry On Tradition of Judicial CorruptionForThem
May 1, 2015 § Leave a comment
We’re back and we’ve continued to walk the beat, we’ve got the inside story, so back to business: The case we’ve followed in Kings County Supreme Court House Index # 22335/2003, supposedly presided over by Kenneth ” Roy Bean” Sherman and Special Referee Miriam Sunshine, which has been and is one among many, reportedly rigged-– , in a Case-Fixing Scam prevalent in the New York Judiciary to con the public and is part of the corruption, we all hear and know about pervasive in our government. The case is now in front of the Second Appellate Division Court Judges, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., PRISCILLA HALL, JEFFREY A. COHEN, ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ., who have, ostensibly, to all appearances, decided to partake in the much read about fraud existent in this case, following in the footsteps of the just mentioned lower judges.
Honorable Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., if your actions are honest and above board, then you should not have any problem or objection to them being posted or publicized.
In deference to our Audience and readership the back story:
The action that 2 subsequent cases are based on, i.e, the case against Defendants, William Hamel, and/of Dinkes & Schwitzer instituted in 2011, and the appeal instituted in 2014, was a Personal Injury case that William Hamel, arrested in 2009 for Bribery of Public Servant and Insurance Fraud, and charged with 19 Felony counts while working for Dinkes & Schwitzer, confessed and convicted in 2013, were hired in 2005 to remedy and prosecute the case with 5 separate Defendants individually listed and separated by commas in the caption, to take the case from this attorney Bert Taras, fired by Plaintiff in matter, (Taras was fired as he was suspected by Plaintiff’s camp of allegedly, stealing money from the plaintiff, and taking bribes from 4 of the defendants, a David Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan to keep them out of the case, which the plaintiff lawyers Taras, and Hamel, Jensen, etc. from Schwitzer & Assoc. did, since they were paid more than handsomely to go along with the underhanded “arrangement” and criminal ruse, thereby not prosecuting the case they were hired to prosecute, with assorted lawyers from the 5th defendant’s law firm a Goldberg Segalla, the defense Counsel hired by Great American Insurance Company that solely covered the 5th defendant, entity 1625 Emmons Ave. Inc., participate in the fraud.
Documents suggest lawyers from Goldberg Segalla, pipelined the loot from the 4 defendants, to the plaintiff’s attorneys. And as they definitely wouldn’t have delivered the payola pro bono, it is assumed they apportioned some for themselves,–
Documents that reveal the initial Theft, bribery and Insurance Fraud and other various other crimes in the plot believed to have been commenced by Taras, also reveal his usurpation from it, as well as the takeover, and continuation of it by Hamel, Jensen, along with other lawyers at various times involved in the case at Dinkes & Schwitzer/so-called now Schwitzer & Associates,so-called now, Schwitzer & Associates, (Word is Schwitzer changed the name to flee from the notoriety,-he can’t), seizing Taras’ lion’s share of the “proceeds”, as of 2005 at his firing.
The 5/2/11 Taras fax correspondence below concealed from the plaintiff, from the fired as of 2005, plaintiff attorney, Bert Taras demanding from Goldberg Segalla, his name be included on the settlement the check drafted, Taras, another alleged cocky criminal admits he is “FORMER PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY” — yet, and get this everybody DEMANDING: ” …ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF” dictating he be included in the payments going to the plaintiff!
The presence of this damning document which was one among many other damning documents that Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer & Associates accidentally on purpose forgot to omit was included in the public record, and remained among the little that was untampered with in the public file. It indicates that Taras was in touch with Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer & Associates and the defendants and Great American defense law firm Goldberg Segalla,–in this fax he addresses lawyer Frank Ciano, from the firm, throughout the course of the case as Taras was fired in 2005. –We want to stress the monies paid to Taras from Goldberg Segalla that this fax refers to are kickbacks as the 4 defendants paid to be illegally left out of the case are monies stolen from and belonging to the plaintiff, are illegal kickbacks as the plaintiff did not authorize any funds to be paid to him and Goldberg Segalla would not have any legal reason to pay him, the content of the fax blatantly displays illegality as it was concealed from the plaintiff, and any contact with him by Schwitzer & Associates and/or Goldberg Segalla was executed without permission of the plaintiff.
But to secure the illegal deal Goldberg Segalla lawyers, covertly respond to the above fax- confirming the illegal transport of funds to Taras and Schwitzer & Associates with Rafael Otero being the ringleader on that end of the ruse
Thus, among Goldberg Segalla’s, lawyers reputed to be known, to be involved, and assisting in the subterfuge, (and documents imply there are several) a Rafael Otero reputedly acted as chief liaison on Goldberg Segalla’s end, dropping off and distributing the money stolen from and belonging to the plaintiff, in the form of a closeted drafted check comprising the “proceeds from disbursements”,–as referred to in Goldberg Segalla, and fired Taras correspondences above, a part of which was most probably stolen from Great American, (of course since it was not with their approval in more all likelihood committing Insurance Fraud which Hamel was already caught committing). The other funds likely, apparently and plausibly, came from the 4 other defendants and paid to Hamel, Taras, Jensen, etc. from Schwitzer & Assoc. and Goldberg Segalla the total of which in a Personal Injury case should have been allocated to the plaintiff, since Hamel, Schwitzer & Assoc. already stole monies, from the settlement, in the guise of fraudulent fess and disbursements when they weren’t entitled to take any money all-allegedly
We sill stress that the plaintiff, now Appellant, emphasized to Roy Bean, Sunshine, in open court on record as well as in documents showing the proof above to them and the same proof to supposedly Honorable Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., of the Appellate Division, in documents that “There is no legal reason for defendant’s lawyers to pay plaintiff’s lawyers”. As the alleged corrupt judges listed who know this, as does the public backed Hamel, Taras, Jensen, etc. from Schwitzer & Assoc. and their lawyers Godosky & Gentile, the press and the public, of which we are both members, can only conclude you are corrupt involved in the Case- Fixing Scam. And that is not alleged!
The presumed subterfuge was, and continues to be, feebly ensconced, to the degree it can be, by the above lawyers as they putatively committed among Felonies, Bribery, Grand Larceny, Insurance fraud, Money Laundering, Tampering with Evidence, and so forth and includes the added attempt to conceal it from the public and the law, which is useless as We won’t let them!
As for the money involved, it is accurately estimated to be in the double digit millions, due to the amount sued for from the get go, and due to the amount of people and lawyers involved. The 4 defendants who allegedly paid bribes to be left out of the case, despite being named separately in the caption from 1625 Emmons, were completely left out of its litigation, and left out of separate litigation against each one. There are no documents anywhere reflecting their inclusion in the case, except for illegal inclusion in the caption and illegal settlement papers, which has been part of the law-violating deception and fraud, as among minor things it depicts vast tampering with evidence at the very least. In fact their exclusion from the case is flagrantly pointed and noticeable; and their exclusion from the settlement check even more so.
There are yet more alleged “players” in the conspiracy, the defence firm of Godosky & Gentile representing Hamel Jensen, and Schwitzer & Assoc. who just happen to influence cases, and the Judiciary, allegedly, as their office is resident to, 61 Broadway, NY NY 10006, same as its neighbors the New York State Committee on Judicial Conduct, and the 1st Departmental Disciplinary Committee– (61 Broadway has consequently been redubbed as the Hub, and “Private Cronies’ Club” of the Legal Profession and New York Judiciary)
It is imputed, as documents also imply Kings County Supreme Court Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman, (who objected to our articles as did the Godoskys both writing a letter during the case to Administrative Judge Knipel), and that of his underling Special Referee Miriam Sunshine, rigged the case, acting prejudicially in favor of their pals in the legal profession, by falsifying, suppressing, and tampering with evidence, unlawfully being in contact with the defendants, inventing their own laws, abusing their positions, etc), impairing the plaintiff and plaintiff’s case against them every which way they could, (as the evidence against them supporting the Plaintiff”s case is humongous), obstructing justice, egregiously violating the law, while pretending to oversee Index # 22335/2003, just to keep them out of jail, apparently passing the torch of such detestable conduct, to the Second Department Appellate Division Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., who seem to have taken it.
It is noteworthy, that all of these “alleged”, crimes (and in reality they are not alleged as examination of the records reveal), perpetrated by all of the above mentioned, including those inflicted on the plaintiff and the rest of the public, by cognizant and complicit presiding Judge Kenneth P. “Roy Bean” Sherman , (“Roy Bean”a perfect moniker, as is the consensus of most, given his alleged inadequacy as a judge to properly, within the confines of the law adjudicate cases that involve his cronies), and Miriam Sunshine, (as it was consistently announced in court and submitted in documents) took place during the time that William Hamel was arrested, fighting his conviction and confessing to criminal charges, allowed out of being incarcerated only by paying a $300K fine and serving a conditional Discharge in 2013 and on. WE of the public have no tolerance for any corruption especially that which is implemented by Judges paid by the public, using abusing their positions of power against them public that pays them
The case, consequently submitted for appeal, by the now Appellant, whom we will call for his protection, Mr. Charles McCray, (we are changing the name and identity of the Plaintiff as he has been a target of threats and coercion by the lawyers mentioned in this article), a disabled senior,receiving disability, impoverished, and barely surviving on a stagnant income, filed a preliminary and comprehensive motion, a huge document, 150 pages, (excluding the exhibits) with a history of the case being appealed from, including countless exhibits to substantiate McCray’s cause, by all those who read it, accurately revealing depicting the crimes committed allegedly by Hamel, Jensen,Taras Schwitzer, and Assoc. and the allegedly occurring in the courtrooms of Roy Bean and Sunshine in response.(“atrocities”, to quote the document, (The 1st page of the Court Order and Decision referring to it to the left), logically requesting various relief among which requesting waiving all Court Fees–which even to the working person, are beyond dear, including necessary documents as proof of financial straits exceeding compliance with lenient CPLR laws on the matter, allowing and granting the waiver of all fees to indigent appellants, the motion also citing related laws and case law. McCray, in legal documents that we’ve examined categorically states, he cannot at all, afford to pay for the case. Pursuant to legal contacts and insiders, a frequent request that has historically been granted.
McCray in his mammoth document which was followed by a Reply of similar magnitude, thorough, same approximate length, and amount of exhibits, also requesting the Judges remove the Defendants from the caption, as they weren’t sued, —which does not at all have to be court ordered, but by including them in any documents when they weren’t parties to the case, on one front shows blatant prejudicial conduct deliberately enacted to help the respondents, Hamel and friends. and their defense counsel Godosky & Gentile, and on another falsifies and invalidates evidence as well as the case Hamel and friends as well as their defense counsel Godosky & Gentile, are prosecuting.
McCray’s Motion provided proof, (we are posting same below), of the secretive monies unlawfully paid to Hamel, Schwitzer & Assoc. and Taras, by Goldberg Segalla, providing the settlement check naming Great American as the sole payor.
But what is distinctly obvious is that with the Second Department Judges’ allegedly quiescence and concurrence typified by incorporating non- parties to the case on documents whose inclusion on them infers they were included and prosecuted in the case, solely demonstrates the Second Department Appellate Division Judge’s, the supposedly honorable Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., complicity in the crimes.-allegedly. —
Below is the check, and the only check that was cut to McCray by Hamel, the Plaintiff/Appellant in case docket #2014-09509n by Hamel and Schwitzer & Assoc., –that is blatantly missing the names of defendants David Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, Irving Salzburg who Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer & Associates, and Godosky & Gentile fallaciously claim–and in writing they prosecuted in a not just “fully” but “successfully” prosecuted case.–Obviously they were not prosecuted since there names are not on any check, and no other monies came from them to McCray.
The way it goes is, one and only defendant payer on the one and only settlement check demonstrates equals one and only defendant prosecuted in the case and the money from the other defendants went elsewhere than to the Plaintiff.– and we’re going to publicize it.
But with that said, in MacCray’s Motion he also requested, such things that should not be considered as relief, but are considered automatic, integral and contributing parts of any case prosecuted, but were not present in the previous venue, Kings County Supreme neither in “Roy Bean’s” courtroom, nor Sunshine’s, to wit, the abidance to law, the rejection of the respondents adding or removing documents to and from the file as tampering with and falsification of evidence was a consistent occurrence in the case, and transparency in the case, as among things ex parte contact was a constantly ensuing factor, that was incompetently hidden because of the arrogance alleged culprits.–allegedly
Richard Godosky, on the other hand whose office still located in the Hub and Private Cronies Club of Legal and Court System, the 61 Broadway, in opposition submitted a 5 page document maniacally in repetition demanding the denial of the waiver of fees request, solely addressing the denial of waiver of fees request, requesting no other relief, but adding it was “useless” for McCray to go forward with the Appeal, (“Useless?”Why would it be “useless” and how would Richard Godosky know it is ?), containing absolutely no evidence or exhibits whatsoever!
In response, Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ. in response, denied the Appellant’s request, in full, granting Godosky’s Opposition in full!
As we have said, the above judges, are following in Roy Bean’s allegedly, (Allegedly, right!) corrupt footsteps, documents pointedly reveal MacCray made the same request, to have all fees with any relevance to the case waived, on countless occasions to Roy Bean, submitting substantiating documents.
MacCray, the Plaintiff, also requested of Roy Bean to remove the names of any Defendants, who were not parties to the case, since they were not parties to the case, giving proof,–Coincidentally–and there are no coincidences, Roy Bean, ignored and denied that request as well, each and every time, without legality. It should be noted, documents reveal that nowhere in the case including live court proceedings, did the defense object to the removal of the defendants from any document. yet as documents reveal, Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer& Assoc. refused to when instructed by the Plaintiff, as have Roy Bean, Sunshine, and Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ.,, refused to when requested by the now Appellant as well!–We don’t find this coincidental-We find it corrupt.
WE want to be crystal clear, the Court Order Decision above emphasizes, and shines floodlights on the far reaching corruption existent in the supposed legal system and the allegedly corrupt Judiciary as well as the influence peddling that prompted it, as it denies not just fully waiving all related court fees for the Appellant who falls well within the confines of the law to obtain it so it is a perfect example of Obstruction of Justice, but it also ostentatiously and flagitiously, inter alia, denies transparency in the case, accentuating these jurists’ allegiance to their chums, Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer & Assoc., Taras, and Godosky & Gentile, over nad above all else, and their participation in Obstruction of Justice-allegedly.
Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P., Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., we want to express our appreciation to all of you, for giving us plenty of fodder to write about. Corruption in our government, has been in the forefront and the focus of the news, and the public eats it up. Writing about it only puts feathers in our caps!
Our articles, past, present, and future articles, their content, and the documents attached will live on for eternity on the internet, never to be deleted, some of which, exist in the Court Records, in among these Court Houses, Kings County Supreme Court, Bronx Supreme Court-Criminal Term, New York County Civil and Supreme Court, the Second Department Appellate Division–that is unless, the records and evidence have been tampered with, which has already occurred in the venues of this case.
Above are just 2 of the pieces of incriminating evidence that demonstrate that Bribes exchanged between defendants/defendant’s lawyers and plaintiff’s lawyers illegally. Hamel, and crew have been incapable of explaining the legality of such payments, and or a letter or fax referring to them, –as none exists, which has allegedly prompted Hamel to escape the Subpoena that demanded his testimony regarding this and other alleged illegal activities involving this among other cases.
While in Kings County Supreme, to support them in their crimes Roy Bean, to participating in obstructing justice, devised 2 Court Orders, one for the public to digest, and the other for illegally withheld from the plaintiff, the public and the public file, making up his own laws, to illegally delay the case, in the 1st Order, and then making up his own laws to put an end to put an end to the case.–allegedly.
But the plaintiff outsmarted Roy Bean knowing this was an illegal Order–no judge can order a litigant to hire an attorney!-Roy Bean was stupid enough to put this in writing. Roy Bean Sherman you are the cause of your expulsion from the Judiciary.
The above was the public version declared and disseminated in court that Roy Bean Sherman wrote on the sly, apparently planning to use. Roy Bean’s order goes on to say, specifically “At this point the case is disposed.”– In violation of law, so secretly written and documented, Roy Bean demands the end of an active case!
This is just one example of Roy Bean being deeply involved in Judicial corruption, participating in the Case -Fixing scam, implementing and partaking in Obstruction of Justice, –which is precisely why the Petitioner’s name is withheld for the protection purposes.
It is the right of every petitioner/litigant to prosecute his or her case pro se. A judge can’t legally order the petitioner/litigant to hire a lawyer–and further give an expiration date for doing such. There is absolutely no legality behind this order. (If it was so important to him for the litigant to hire a lawyer Roy Bean should have paid for it!)
A judge also cannot invent his own laws.
We query, Roy Bean, the client has until 1/30/12 to hire new counsel and if he doesn’t, then what?
Roy Bean Sherman was distinctly delaying the progress of the case, quelling the civil and constitutional rights of the petitioner, abusing the power of his position and must be removed from it.
This is the 2nd version of the 11/14/12 Order, that was illegal in the 1st place. Just above, the Order deliberately hidden from plaintiff, which was put in the public file solely by the plaintiff–which was the only way it was going to get there, as Roy Bean Sherman and his associates weren’t going to file it. This obscured court Order is indicative of the rampant illegal ex parte contact that occurred during the case among the illegal communication Sherman obscured from the plaintiff.
This order indicates that had the plaintiff gotten a lawyer Sherman and Hamel, Jensen, Schwitzer & Assoc.,and Godosky & Gentile would have made a deal with him or her to help dispose the case, via blackmail, or extortion as the hiring of legal counsel has nothing to do with restoring a case to calendar.-allegedly.
Since Sherman himself says in his obscured order:”the client has until 1/30/13 to obtain new counsel, whereby new counsel shall make a motion to restore to calendar At this point this case is disposed”–It is not allegedly.
Evidently Roy Bean passed his torch of corruption to Sunshine who ran with it-allegedly. In the next installment we will include 2 documents that reveal, as if it hasn’t been revealed already thorough non-stop Case -Fixing and Obstruction of Justice.
Once again the corruption is regnant in the Judiciary which is why complaints have been lodged against Roy Bean Sherman with the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct demanding his removal from the bench.
After almost 3 years of Sherman pretending to preside over a case but in reality disseminating corruption–allegedly assigning the case without necessity to an Evidentiary Hearing/Hear and Determine and to which by written agreement, he was supposed to have signed off, meaning by law he was supposed to have no involvement in the case. (Which in the next installment we will show the documents our contacts in the Kings County Courthouse have gladly and swiftly delivered to us showing no such thing occurred. Sherman was illegally involved in the case throughout its life in Kings County and likely still is). A Special Referee, Miriam Sunshine was supposed to be the only one to oversee, but in this case no illegal holds were barred
McCray filed a subpoena for Hamel’s appearance (testimony) and records. –Out Audience being highly intelligent knows that violating a subpoena is illegal. But apparently, Sunshine, who’s head is also on the chopping block does not.
Below the subpoena filed for Hamel’s testimony and the start of the Evidentiary Hearing that was supposed to be held in front of Miriam Sunshine,– which, even that could not be administered within the confines of the law, as illegality was raging-allegedly.
On 9/11/13 the 1st day of Court the above subpoena was presented in front of Sunshine who subsequently confirmed it vocally as reflected in the minutes below:
Below, the 9/23/13 Sunshine Court Order supporting the Hamel subpoena denying the motion to quash (it), where Sunshine, although without a doubt in her own wording, reinforces the subpoena for Hamel’s appearance, and which cannot be interpreted any other way, in her unsuccessful effort to be ambiguous (in order to fecklessly save her hind quarters), she deliberately and noticeably, leaves out Hamel’s name –showing her complicity in the Case-fixing scam.
The non-existent Evidentiary Hearing that never quite took place as Miriam Sunshine would abruptly halt it, after hearing the defendants left out 4 defendants from the case taking kickbacks to do so.
To add, Hamel who while given the privilege of his freedom in exchange for serving out a Conditional Discharge not only never showed up in court violating Sunshine’s 9/11/13 vocal demand and written 9/23/13 Court Order demanding that he do so– went unsanctioned by Sunshine.
(Disobeying a subpoena is a violation of law–Everybody has to obey a subpoena) Hamel escaped his subpoena, —-and did so— while serving on a Conditional Discharge, — without being sanctioned by Sunshine, exemplifying that Sunshine is a con artist, obstructed justice, is involved in the Case -Fixing Scam, therefore has no business, like her predecessor, Roy Bean being on the bench, and beyond that judging other people-allegedly
Sunshine then comes down with another beyond-the-boundaries- of-the-law decision, quite in character for her and those involved in the Case-fixing scam, as she violates law, yet again via her 4/30/14 decision where she unlawfully reverses her own 9/11/13 vocal order as well as her 9/23/13 order–Sunshine, a Judge can’t reverse his or her own order–it is illegal.
As it would turn out, Sunshine would abruptly halt what was supposed to be a hearing on 4/30/14 again without legality in the middle of the hearing demanding the summation by “mailed in” and then accepting the usual suspects’ 5 page document substantiated by no evidence.
Regarding the Hear and Determine/Evidentiary Hearing, at the advent of the Hearing papers had to be signed by all parties agreeing on the hearing and on the type of Hearing. Documents reveal that 2 documents were disseminated for signatures. On the 1st, the slot choosing the type of hearing that would allow Roy Bean’s interference, is already checked!.–And that is without the Plaintiff’s consultation and agreement, and signature –checked on the sly–as usual.– allegedly-– The 2nd Hear and Determine document that the plaintiff signed and was privy to was signed by the plaintiff on contingent that Roy Bean signed off on the case. Except that illegally of course Roy Bean never stopped being involved in the case, and never stopped –allegedly
Sickie Richard Godosky foully mouthing off in court ON RECORD spewing threats– not unusual for him, in fact commonplace, as documents reveal that this was not his first and won’t be his last.That said if they were innocent, documents would confirm that–but the documents reveal otherwise.
If they were innocent, they wouldn’t have to they wouldn’t have to resort to threats and coercion. We challenge, any one of the people mentioned in this article to publicly, with substantiating documentation, to disprove anything we have said. We add that the defendants were never compelled by Roy Bean Sherman or Sunshine to prove their case, which is because they are incapable.–(which is among the reasons for the threats by them).
During the case, as an adjunct to the alleged crimes committed, theft of countless dollars, estimated in the millions, the Plaintiff, now Appellant has been subjected to threats and coercion, reportedly spewed by such characters as Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Richard Godosky–all of which is on record.–or should be as tampering with evidence has been part and parcel of the case.
We are informing our Readership it is our staunch belief that these people are under the psychopathic impression they are above the law, and entitled to violate the law.
We are telling all of you, mentioned in the documents in this article are recorded on the public file, (or should be. –And if they’re not they are on the internet ), and are emblematic of your illegal high jinks and are documented in courthouses all over the state. We are extremely proud of Mr. McCray’s action, as is the public, Law Enforcement and our colleagues in the press.
As far as the other concerned parties, We will not hesitate to continue to post and publish all your illegalities.
We recommend to anyone seeking an attorney, to do your due diligence — As a courtesy, for the public’s protection, we do not recommend hiring any of the aforementioned lawyers, i.e, Schwitzer Associates, William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Godosky & Gentile, we do not recommend using their services. As documents reveal contact with them would be at your own risk.
Hamel has already been involved Bribery and Insurance Fraud and to this day, as he has not paid reparations to his victims, is still doing so. That said, he did so while in the employ of Dinkes & Schiwtzer/ Schwitzer & Associates, with their full knowledge. Jensen worked under both Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates and fully participated in the illegalities, C. McCray, the plaintiff was thorough enough to imbed substantiating documents in the public record.
Godosky & Gentile, of 61 Broadway, building neighbors of the DDC and CJC there as the safety net to defend allegedly crooked lawyers such as above as well as allegedly crooked judges.
Since this case which we have been profiling is typical, then in our opinion, we can only surmise that any case that Godosky & Gentile succeeded in winning was only won via illegal means, and nepotism.–which by the way, taints any past cases–as they would not have been adjudicated without prejudice, and raises doubt on the innocence of any client they might defend.
For the information of those involved, We the people are NOT allowing the corruption in the Judiciary to continue.
CAVEAT: As only the alleged guilty will consider this to be inflammatory, the public and law enforcement are glad the allegedly corrupt, (members of), the Judiciary and their Case-Fixing Scams are being brought to the fore. Should any of the supposed criminals mentioned in this article, threaten and/or decide to harm the plaintiff in retaliation in any way, we will have no problem publishing it, and our contacts in law enforcement will be alerted,
Disclaimer: Due to our Journalistic integrity, we have been printing terms such as “alleged(ly)“, “supposed(ly)”, etc. –however we’ve printed them in italics, to emphasize the fact that the criminal actions and incidents we have conveyed to our Readership, our Audience, our Colleagues in the media, the public, after close examination of the evidence, we, without a doubt, know to be true.
Our articles can now be seen on Facebook.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD