Open Letter To Thomas A. Klonick, Chair, Of The New York State Commission On Judicial Conduct (NYCJC): We Strongly Urge You To PERMANENTLY Remove Kings County Supreme Court Judge Kenneth P. Sherman, Who Has Allegedly (Allegedly? Not Per The Documents), Colluded In Case Fixing Scams, Obstruction Of Justice, And Other Alleged, Forms Of Corruption From The Bench, The Authority Of Which The NYCJC Is Empowered To Impose. We The People, Of The Media And The Public, Do Not Tolerate Governmental OR Judicial Corruption.
May 1, 2015 § Leave a comment
Dear Mr. Klonick,
It has come to our attention, complaints have been leveled against Kings County Supreme Court Judge Kenneth P. Sherman alleging tremendous corruption citing his active involvement in Case Fixing Scams, Obstruction of Justice, the evidence of which we have seen embedded in the public file, and which should provoke the expeditious removal of Sherman and whomever else is involved in these Case-Fixing scams, under the jurisdiction of the NYS CJC.
With examination of the documents, as far as we can see his actions are not alleged. We are posting just some of the documents included in the records which support accusations of his alleged corruption–( Please note as this is a news article we are compelled to print such terms as alleged when frequently referring to that which is factual).
The Order to the left was the 11/14/12 Order for public consumption.
The order below was the hidden and opposing version of the 11/14/12 COURT ORDER, completely different from the public version announced in court recorded on record that Sherman invented “in camera” apparently planning to use if the plaintiff were dumb enough to acquiesce to his demand to hire an attorney.
Sherman devised the Order without consultation of the petitioner in fact hid this order from petitioner, and public file again withholding documents and evidence from the public and public consumption. committing Abuse of Power, Obstruction of Justice.–allegedly This order only documented in public file via the plaintiff who mentioned it in open court embedding it in motions. This Order indicates Roy Bean Sherman along with the Defendants, Hamel, Jensen and their lawyers, Godosky & Gentile, would have allegedly made yet another illegal and shrouded deal, this time with whatever lawyer that might have been hired to betray the plaintiff, as apparently they.Hamel Jensen, Godosky & Gentile would have used any tactics including blackmail, to safeguard their white collar criminal cronies from incarceration; Roy Bean Sherman specifically says in his order that upon the “plaintiff obtaining legal representation, there will be a motion to restore to calendar”–This completely illegal as the case was and still is active, and obtaining legal counsel is irrelevant. Roy Bean Sherman’s order goes on to say, specifically “At this point “The is case is disposed.” –Really! The case is disposed and the pro se counsel is not privy to it-Really! This is just one example of Roy Bean Sherman being deeply involved in Judicial corruption, participating in the Case -Fixing scam, implementing and partaking in Obstruction of Justice, allegedly–which is precisely why the Petitioner’s name is withheld for the protection purposes. The photo is Courtesy of World-News-Media.com
These are 2 contradicting Court orders for the same appearance date, created by Sherman. The one on the left revealed publicly, and the 1 on the right was concealed, and completely contradicts it, putting an end to a case coincidentally brought against Sherman’s friends in the legal field, William Hamel who was fighting 19 Felony counts of (Bribery and Insurance Fraud at the time) as well as his firm Dinkes & Schwitzer, (Currently Schwitzer & Associates), the end of which would have strictly benefitted them. The just mentioned crimes were relevant to the case referenced in documents above as the plaintiff in the case was accusing them of similar crimes committed on the plaintiff’s case. The order on the right was devised, written, and hidden from the plaintiff in and during the case, never mentioned in open court or on record only to be put in the record via the plaintiff–Bravo!
Mr. Klonick, whatever excuses Sherman may give for the above there are none that are in line with the law. Whatever lawyer Sherman can get to defend the above, such legal counsel cannot makeup any excuse for the above in line for with the law.
We should not have to write that the above Orders have no place within the confines of the law: 1- A judge cannot order a litigant to obtain legal counsel for whatever reason. 2- A Judge cannot delay a case on the pretense of ordering a litigant to obtain legal counsel. 3-Obtaining legal counsel has nothing to do with disposing a case–and behind the back of plaintiff 4- A judge cannot put an end to an active case for no legal reason 5- A Judge cannot create hidden orders. -To wit, a judge cannot create hidden orders legally.
Please be aware all we have to do is produce 1 piece of evidence to prove our point. And all it takes is 1 case to prove our point. That said, we know of more documents in the public file, that without a doubt indicate alleged impropriety on Sherman’s part when in fact there’s not supposed to hint of it associated to any jurist in our system. that is, if Sherman and the others allegedly illegally involved have not tampered with the records they have been alleged to do.
Documents reveal that Sherman allegedly made a persistent effort to persistently suppress evidence from the public file. So deliberate were his alleged efforts that the plaintiff after requesting Sherman release documents to the file, had to resubmit documents which from what we can see were also withheld from any timely release to the public file.
According to the document at right, the original this was personally handed to Sherman. Not only was the original withheld from the file but the resubmitted version was also withheld from the file not to be released until Sherman was of a mind to.-allegedly.
Civil servants, such as Sherman are supposed to be serving the public which is what they are paid to do They are not supposed to use their positions to serve themselves and their cronies, fixing cases, and obstructing justice to strike points for themselves with the latter whose defense counsel just happens to be Godosky & Gentile, the law firm whose office is situated at 61 Broadway, the same address as the NYSCJC, and the 1st Departmental Disciplinary Committee.–Do not attempt to tell us or the rest of the public that influence peddling has not gone on!
Civil servants, such as Sherman are supposed to be serving the public, which is what they are paid to do–not vice versa.
Such wrongdoing must be dealt with by the swift eradication of the perpetrator from his position by the authorities, that are put in place to do so in which case is the NYSCJC. which admits so on their own website. We will accept no less. And we quote:
By provision of the State Constitution (Article 6, Section 22), the Commission:
shall receive, initiate, investigate and hear complaints with respect to the conduct, qualifications, fitness to perform or performance of official duties of any judge or justice of the unified court system…and may determine that a judge or justice be admonished, censured or removed from office for cause, including, but not limited to, misconduct in office, persistent failure to perform his duties, habitual intemperance, and conduct, on or off the bench, prejudicial to the administration of justice, or that a judge or justice be retired for mental or physical disability preventing the proper performance of his judicial duties.”
When one commits egregious crimes against the public in which he or she serves, Judge or no, he is a perpetrator.
It has come to our attention that it has long been known, and allegedly swept under the rug, that Judges, such as Sherman, are allegedly working against the citizenry that pays them,–thinking they are deserving of their wages.–They are not; as they have an unabashed air of entitlement to defy of the law which flies in the face of not only the law itself, but also in the face of their employers, the public that pays them their unearned wages.
It has also come to our attention that Sherman is not alone in the Case-fixing Scams-allegedly. We will write as many open letters as need be, to rid our government and Judiciary of these criminals whose collars happen to be white.
We Of The Media And Public Tolerate Neither Governmental Nor Judicial Corruption. We are in full support of the complaints filed against Sherman and impatiently are waiting for his removal from office something of which obviously should have occurred a long time ago.
THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD