William Hamel, Schwitzer & Associates, Alias Dinkes & amp; Schwitzer Cited For Embezzling Millions From Clients In Court Documents AreAllegedly Being Protected By The Crooked New York Judiciary Influenced By Defense Counsel Godosky & Gentile Of 61 Broadway The Legal Profession And Court System “Cronies Club” Headquarters: THERE ARE NO LEGAL CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE DEFENDANTS OR THEIR LAWYERS PAY PLAINTIFF’S LAWYERS AND WHEN DEFENDANTS OR THEIR LAWYERS PAY PLAINTIFF’S LAWYERS, THEY ARE PAYING THEM KICKBACKS

May 4, 2015 § Leave a comment

“There are no legal circumstances where Defendants or their lawyers pay Plaintiff’s lawyers”

We are quoting the statement said on record and in open court umpteen times as well as in documents in the courtrooms of  Kings County Supreme Judge Kenneth P. Sherman–better known as “Roy Bean”, and  Special Referee Miriam Sunshine, as well as in documents presented and submitted to Appellate Division Judges: Cheryl E. Chambers, L. Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ..   However, to protect their white collar criminal friends, Hamel who confessed to bribery and Insurance Fraud, and the law firm he was working for at the time of commission of these crimes, to wit, Schwitzer & Associates, alias, Dinkes & Schiwtzer, and to protect their defense counsel, Godosky & Gentile, have ignored the facts ruling in Schwitzer & Associates favor, at their defense counsel, Godosky & Gentile bidding.

According to  Robert Godosky of Godosky & Gentile, and we quote  “There is no money!”-Well the documents say differently.

Below refers to kickbacks paid to Dinkes & Schwitzer, by defendants’ lawyers Goldberg Segalla who acted illegally as  go between delivering the money. The payments were not and are not authorized by the Plaintiff and in fact were obscured from the plaintiff.

Goldberg Segalla covert 5-12-05 Kickback letter to Dinkes & Schwitzer/Schwitzer & Associates in response to Taras' 5/2/05  fax. PHoto courtesy of world-news-media.com

Goldberg Segalla covert 5-12-05 Kickback letter to Dinkes & Schwitzer/Schwitzer & Associates in response to Taras’ 5/2/05 fax. PHoto courtesy of world-news-media.com

Taras attorney fired in 2005 by Plaintiff, in 2011, covertly demanding his cut of kickbacks!   "on the Plaintiff's behalf"! Photo courtesy of World-News-Media.com

Taras attorney fired in 2005 by Plaintiff, in 2011, covertly demanding his cut of kickbacks! “on the Plaintiff’s behalf”! Photo courtesy of World-News-Media.com

 

The case originally had a David Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, and Irving Salzburg as Defendants listed in the caption. But they paid kickbacks to William Hamel who was already involved in Bribery and Insurance Fraud, of Schwitzer & Associates, alias, Dinkes & Schwitzer, to be kept out of the case using their lawyers, their defense counsel Goldberg Segalla as the funneling Instruments in the Bribery, Grand Larceny and Fraud,  Obstruction of Justice, contrivance.

Below is the illegal public order dreamed up by Sherman which is illegal on many fronts–illegality invalidates any court order.  1-As we have said is illegal as as judge can’t demand a litigant hire legal counsel. 2- Sherman in his own handwriting and in front of many witnesses wrote this court order with the knowledge that the defendants were left out of the  case as he was also presented with the above kickback correspondences, and was told of the circumstances in court. Sherman chose to break the law, and withhold evidence from the public file, despite Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates embezzling millions.

This is the public version  of Sherman's  Illegal Court Order. that he loudly announced in open court. on record . Sherman made sure to give the Petitioner a copy before leaving. This is an illegal Order  as the pro se Petitioner said on many occasions that  the case was going to be prosecuted  pro se which is the right of any petitioner and a judge can't devise an order  demanding a Petitioner be represented by legal counsel. Of course Roy Bean showing his illegal bent blatantly demonstrates where his allegiance lies and that is with lawlessness  coming down with this  illegal decision to wasting the time and money of the Petitioner, and taxpayers,  in an effort to strike points with the Defendants. This is a prime example of abuse of power and obstruction of justice. Roy Bean there is no excuse. --but wait there's more.....Photo courtesy of world-News-Media.com

This is the public version of Sherman’s Illegal Court Order. that he loudly announced in open court. on record . Sherman made sure to give the Petitioner a copy before leaving. This is an illegal Order as the pro se Petitioner said on many occasions that the case was going to be prosecuted pro se which is the right of any petitioner and a judge can’t devise an order demanding a Petitioner be represented by legal counsel. Of course Roy Bean showing his illegal bent blatantly demonstrates where his allegiance lies and that is with lawlessness coming down with this illegal decision to wasting the time and money of the Petitioner, and taxpayers, in an effort to strike points with the Defendants. This is a prime example of abuse of power and obstruction of justice. Roy Bean there is no excuse. –but wait there’s more…..Photo courtesy of world-News-Media.com

The illegal public Court Order of Roy Bean Sherman above written in defiance of the law, the and in defiance of public that pays him his wages

Allegedly Sherman was not satisfied with the illegality of the above order. Thus to  make it extra illegal, Sherman complied the hidden version of the above court Order rendering the active case disposed!

4-19-14 11-14-12 11:14:12 roy Bean Sherman Bogus Illega Phony FAke Court Order decision ex Parte Illegal Illegitimate Marcia Salzburg My Name MY NAME CROSSED OUT crossed out19042014_6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, to speak in the vernacular that alleged (Alleged, right!), criminals  such as Roy Bean do: Yo Roy Bean, since you’ve the temerity to  write Cronen, Grossman, Keirnan,  Salzburg in the caption, then you must know where their money is since their names, as is their money,  missing from the settlement check:

This is the only payment made to the Plaintiff, now Appellant, Mr. McCray. MINUS  bogus fees and disbursements. There were no other monies paid to the plaintiff. There should have been separate checks from Cronen, Grossman, Keirnan, and Salzburg paid to McCray. Alternatively, had McCray agreed, (which according to documents McCray did not), the aformentioned names should have been included on the check, the only payer of which is Great American Insurance Company who covered only 1625 Emmons Ave. --their management company Marvin Gold --who we might add isn't the management company of  individuals!

This is the only payment made to the Plaintiff, now Appellant, Mr. McCray. MINUS bogus fees and disbursements. There were no other monies paid to the plaintiff. There should have been separate checks from Cronen, Grossman, Keirnan, and Salzburg paid to McCray. Alternatively, had McCray agreed, (which according to documents McCray did not), the aformentioned names should have been included on the check, the only payer of which is Great American Insurance Company who covered only 1625 Emmons Ave. –their management company Marvin Gold –who we might add isn’t the management company of individuals!

 

 

Court documents reveal that William Hamel, confessor to Bribery and Insurance Fraud, and colleagues, Schwitzer & Associates, ( the latter, previously called Dinkes & Schiwtzer) as well as our articles and those of Daily News and other news outlets, committed like crimes embezzling millions from clients have found their safe haven in the courtrooms of the New York Judiciary as they are being defended by members of the “Cronies Club” whose headquarters are at 61 Broadway, New York NY 10006

Daily News Hamel 2009 Arrest_000001

 

 

Daily News Hamel 2009 Arrest_000002

 

“There are no legal circumstances where Defendants or their lawyers pay Plaintiff’s lawyers”

The above statement was also announced in open court on record and in documents to Miriam Sunshine who promotes white collar crime as well, since she provoked Hamel to flee his subpoena. Hamel never showed up in court while he was on a Conditional Discharge when criminals are supposed to keep their noses squeaky clean. –Sometimes criminals noses are just too dirty as in this instance!

Sunshine first reinforced the subpoena for Hamel’s testimony, during 9/11/13 court appearance as is evidenced below, and reinforced her words recorded in court in her subsequent court Order of 9/23/13. But to do Godosky & Gentile’s bidding, she chose to violate the law by illegally reversing her decision verified in 2 court records, by telling the Plaintiff and Defendants that the latter may choose whom they please to testify in place of Hamel.

The minutes from the transcript of 9/11/13 court appearance where Sunshine demands Hamel shows up in court

The minutes from the transcript of 9/11/13 court appearance where Sunshine demands Hamel shows up in court

 

“There are no legal circumstances where Defendants or their lawyers pay Plaintiff’s lawyers”

 

The above statement was also stated in the same documents as are above to the Appellate Division Judges to wit,  Cheryl E. Chambers, L. Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ.. who chose to come down with an invalid decision as their decision indicates there are more than one defendant who were included in the case via the caption:

1st page of most recent Court Order Decision of Second Department Appellate Division Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

1st page of most recent Court Order Decision of Second Department Appellate Division Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

 

But they also invalidate their own decision as they denied the Appellant such things as abidance to law, disallowance of illegal addition to or subtraction from the records, and transparency! (We might add that the appellant requested  a full waiver of exorbitant court fees that the non-working and those on a low fixed income cannot afford, which was denied in as well which is not in accordance with the law as well.

2nd page of Second Department Appellate Division Court Order Decision complicit with the supposed alleged case fixing scams rampant in  the Judiciary, Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

2nd page of Second Department Appellate Division Court Order Decision complicit with the supposed alleged case fixing scams rampant in the Judiciary, Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

 

Appellate Division Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, L. Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ.., it was your choice to make this decision. Should you challenge us we will be beyond glad to show the public the motions that requested the relief.

To coincide with the above, Appellate Division Judges, Cheryl E. Chambers, L. Priscilla Hall, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Robert J. Miller, JJ., in order to further obstruct justice,–they granted their buddies’ Godosky & Gentile’s motion sans any evidence to substantiate, and caused an already expensive endeavor attempted by the appellant, to be repeated as the appellant had to reargue the motion spending more money, which defeats the purpose of asking for the fees to be waived in the first place-allegedly, (Allegedly, right!)

So there is no money but there are many documents that say there is and the settlement check is missing money from the defendants who were supposed to be included in the case!

Truth is:

“There will NEVER be any legal circumstances where Defendants or their lawyers pay Plaintiff’s lawyers”-

Aforementioned judges in both venues, you have invalidated your own judgements and have proven your alleged, (alleged, right) involvement in corruption!

We urge the authorities to rid our legal system of the alleged, (Alleged, right) scum that it is composed of.

The Daily News, and other news outlets are and were stating facts regarding this matter as the above documents allegedly, (Allegedly, right) indicate.

We once again warn the people involved: Should any harm come to the plaintiff/appellant the Authorities have been alerted.

 

 

THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading William Hamel, Schwitzer & Associates, Alias Dinkes & amp; Schwitzer Cited For Embezzling Millions From Clients In Court Documents AreAllegedly Being Protected By The Crooked New York Judiciary Influenced By Defense Counsel Godosky & Gentile Of 61 Broadway The Legal Profession And Court System “Cronies Club” Headquarters: THERE ARE NO LEGAL CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE DEFENDANTS OR THEIR LAWYERS PAY PLAINTIFF’S LAWYERS AND WHEN DEFENDANTS OR THEIR LAWYERS PAY PLAINTIFF’S LAWYERS, THEY ARE PAYING THEM KICKBACKS at world-news-media.com.

meta

%d bloggers like this: