Schwitzer & Associates Alias Dinkes & Schwitzer As Usual. Allegedly Violate Taxpayers Stealing Their Time And Money As —1. Richard Godosky Submits Second Bogus Affirmation In Opposition, —-This Time, A Two-Page Document Devoid Of Any Evidence/Exhibits,— Yet Manages To Illegally Include In Caption The Four Defendants, I.E., Dave Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, Irving Salzburg, Who, As Everyone Knows, Paid Bribes To Convicted Criminal, William Hamel And Dinkes & Schwtizer Alias, Schwitzer & Associates To be Ousted From Substratal Case, Illegal Actions Allegedly Emulated And Accepted In Full, By Allegedly Corrupt Second Department Appellate Division Judges, (A Misnomer) Chambers, Hall, Cohen and Miller, Via Crony Godosky Covert Decree, (Allegedly, oh right!). ————— 2.According To Court Documents, Schwitzer & Associates Are Allegedly Being Sued For Malpractice —–Yet Again! (Allegedly, oh sure!) We Do Not Advise Hiring Convicted Criminal William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Of Schwitzer & Associates, Schwitzer & Associates, Or Godosky & Gentile, As They Are In It For Themselves

May 30, 2015 § Leave a comment

If Godosky’s 2nd bogus Aff. in Opp. filed in the Appellate Division, is granted, it will be to illegally aid Godosky and clients, Schwitzer & Associates,  as Second Department Supreme Court And Appellate Division Judges (A Mis-appellation) Click Their Heels To Accommodate The Former Who Are Part Of The Brethren Defending Themselves Against Another Of Their Many Clients Whom They Allegedly Victimized Robbing Them Of Their Money, The TrialDate 5/29/15. (Allegedly-right!)

Dear Readers,

Due to overwhelming requests to post Richard Godosky’s 2nd supposed Affirmation in Opposition submitted to the Second Department Appellate Division, our staff has obtained the documents and we are complying with those requests, since we posted his first nonsensical 5-page piece, submitted in the guise of the same, and which was obviously a ploy to make it appear as he was submitting a legitimate Affirmation in Opposition, (which in reality comprised solely 5 pages of repetitive rants), yet by a compliant and complicit judiciary ruled by Godosky & Gentile and convicted white collar criminal, William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates, was fully granted, this, while  Charles McCray, the Plaintiff, in the case, submitted a motion of approximately 150 -200 pages, as well as a Reply of same amount enumerating the facts of a 12 year case, with exhibits supporting every assertion and request for relief.

Godosky & Gentile, Schwitzer & Associates constant defense counsel, in cases where former clients of the latter, discovered their cases were not prosecuted, and/or in cases clients unearthed missing and stolen funds, as well as in Malpractice cases–the numbers of these people and cases pointing to alleged wrongdoings have added up over the years so that the eponymous William Schwitzer of Schwitzer & Associates changed the name of the firm to it’s current appellation within recent times, and for years and unsuccessfully, according to reliable sources, William Schwitzer has been using PR firms to try to undo the damage.

Legal contacts report that Schwitzer continues to try to dominate the internet, allegedly hiring several PR firms for the dual purpose of in a fruitless effort to suppress the facts our articles and the documents we post within prove, and to extoll his firm’s alleged wins. –We have previously posted “Roy Bean” Sherman’s and Robert Godosky’s letter to Administrative Judge Knipel, found in the records, complaining about our articles. Robert Godosky, on behalf of his inappropriate, previously unannounced client, Kenneth “Roy Bean” Sherman, proclaimed during a court appearance (paraphrased), that they didn’t like “Roy Bean” Sherman’s moniker!–which is quite unfortunate but had “Roy Bean” Sherman acted honestly he wouldn’t have that handle.

Beyond that, Guys, you may control the Judiciary and have them do your bidding, but you can’t control the the Fifth Estate Or The Internet!

According to legal staff who ensured they were part of the high-turnover pattern at the Schwitzer & Associates firm, Wm. Schwitzer has allegedly been paying off rating websites to remove numerous critical reviews regarding them for years which is in line with reports by members of our Readership who have publicly posted scathing assessments about them for eons, have had their negative critiques suddenly disappear.

The above in addition to having their cronies in the Judiciary allegedly, (which documents prove otherwise–and we’ve posted them and will continue to ) fix legal actions where they are the defendants in their favor,–just as we have been reporting. (Allegedly, sure!)

So desperate are Convicted criminal Wm. Hamel, William Schwitzer and /Schwitzer & Associates, (and per legal industry insiders, they are monetarily desperate) that they have had their defense counsel, Richard Godosky, of Godosky & Gentile, submit anything in place of a legitimate motion, getting the corrupt members of the New York Judiciary to join with them in the gambit, which has actually been an unwise gamble as we, and our contacts are on top it and will continue to post.

But of course that which concerns them tmost is the fact that convicted criminal, William Hamel, and his friends at Schwitzer & Associates owe clients millions of dollars due to illicit activities committed against them, cited by the Daily News, and other News outlets, including world-news-media.com, and boldly emblazoned and supported by documentation which is in public file now in 4 courts,i.e., Bronx Supreme, Criminal Term, New York County Supreme, Kings County Supreme, and the Second Department Appellate Division to be accessible to the public and authorities, in perpetuity, and part of which resulted in convicted criminal Wm. Hamel’s prosecution by the New York Office of the Attorney.

Below are prime examples of the Schwitzer’s and Godosky’s desperation in the form of false documents,–that according to sources the creation of which were allegedly preceded by covert pow wows with several of the Judges involved, and personally handed to them— in an attempt to try to get out of paying the monetary debt and debt to society they owe.(Allegedly, unlikely!).

We all know that convicted criminal Wm. Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates have yet been compelled to prove their case/provide supporting evidence which blatantly points to their guilt as well as that of the allegedly corrupt judges who have allowed it. (Allegedly, oh c’mon!)

Directly below, the 2nd half-baked, Richard Godosky Affirmation in Opposition in response to McCray’s reargued motion which again demonstrates Godosky’s brazen ill-fated confidence that the corruption wouldn’t be exposed when in fact our contacts in the court copied us  the document, (as they’ve done before and are more than willing to do again!) and we are presenting it to the immense, immensely, alarmed and objecting public.

Conjointly,  with the obvious and illegal approval of Second Department judges, (misappelation),  determined to save Schwitzer & Associates money, Richard Godosky,  spent as little time as possible, submitting scant motions with zero exhibits/evidence, with relief-granting expectations that thus far without any legal basis have come to fruition only as a result of Godosky & Gentile’s alleged Illegal Ties To The First Departmental Disciplinary Committee, (DDC) AND The New York State Commission On Judicial Conduct, (NY CJC), aka The New York Legal and Judicial Cronies Club,  with whom they share the same address, to wit,  61 Broadway New York NY, possess.

But what is tied in and related to the case we have been profiling is the fact that Schwitzer & Associates are again defendants in yet another alleged Malpractice Case or probably more accurately termed as another scam with Godosky & Gentile in tow, as Defense Counsel, obviously on retainer, (Godosky & Gentile have constantly defended these crooks in cases where their courageous clients have spoken up and decided to fight them), —-In fact there have been so many lawsuits filed and fought against them by clients they’ve conned in their scams, cases filed as Malpractice and similar, that they have been in court fighting more than 5 times within the last 10 years wasting the  taxpayers’ time and money. (Alleged, right!) Just some of the names we have come across, Belkis Anderson, Yuley Shugol, Dermot Thomas, Charlene McCray, and the list goes on.

That said, below, the 2nd paltry Affirmation in Opposition allowed to be filed as a legal document in the “hallowed”  halls of the Appellate Division without any supporting evidence yet again. The fact that Richard Godosky’s first Aff. in Opp. was even glanced at proves preferential and biased treatment.

Plaintiff's name is redacted in the Document to protect the innocent. Richard Godosky as he and crooked clients, William Hamel who is a major part of this case, and Schwitzer & Associates have no evidence to support their case thus they provide none! Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Plaintiff’s name is redacted in the Document to protect the innocent. Richard Godosky as he and crooked clients, William Hamel who is a major part of this case, and Schwitzer & Associates have no evidence to support their case thus they provide none! Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

When in fact the the Godosky’s first Aff. in Opp. contained 5 pages for a 12 year case, bereft of any exhibits or for that matter evidence, the 2nd 2 pages,–and yet the first phony 5 sheet Richard Godosky disarray comprised nothing but repeated rants. (The directions of the A.D. is to include a synopsis of hte “nature” of the case, which of course Godosky’s “essay”, written on behalf of clients Schwitzer & Associates, didn’t as he didn’t have ot comply with any procedural rules.

Yet, the mis-titled Appellate Division “bench-warmers”, Chambers, Hall, Cohen, and Miller, granted them their sole request in full –which was to deny the Plaintiff of his Motion “inter alia” which the dutiful A.D. judges did. A fact that can be explained only by corruption and influence peddling.

As Godosky has no evidence to base his case on he supposedly excerpts the plaintiff's protest of the  corruption meted out by the judges who are supposed to  instead mete out justice photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

As Godosky had and has no evidence to base his case on he supposedly excerpts the plaintiff’s protest of the corruption meted out by the professed judges who are supposed to instead mete out justice.Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Godosky then goes on to melodramatically rave “…the court should not tolerate the biased insulting attack made against the learned judges of this court and the one below” .  Given the overwhelming evidence supporting McCray’s case Godosky outcries sound in a tantrum.

Convicted Criminal William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, William Schwitzer, Bert Taras, Rafael Otero, and the rest of the motley crew, had no embarrassment, showed no restraint in spreading the guilt, and blame and having the judges join in on the criminality ruining their reputations which are ruined forever. Then again whomever decided to go along with the crime did so consciously as they were obviously going to monetarily benefit–or so they thought. The fact that their illicit activities are being publicized is their own fault.

Further, Godosky must learn that when judges egregiously violate the law such as Roy Bean Sherman,  Miriam Sunshine, Chambers, Hall, Cohen, and Miller, they are going to be exposed and the exposure of their wrongdoings will live on after them.

Richard Godosky goes on to lie, (as usual), to the court, because he can, as the the Judiciary is highly corrupt mischaracterizing the judgment of clerks of the court as the Affidavit of Service as well as the motion itself would and could not have been accepted if it were defective as is exhibited below and we’re including pages 12 and 13 the latter Godosky deliberately refers to but is incapable to even paraphrases with any truth.

Side 1 of the Affidavit of Service that Godosky  boldly lies in reference to the Affidavit of Service as it is perfect and perfectly acceptable. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Side 1 of the Affidavit of Service that Godosky boldly lies in reference to the Affidavit of Service as it is perfect and perfectly acceptable. (Name of plaintiff redacted to protect the innocent) Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Side 2 of the non-defective Affidavit of Service that Richard Godosky who apparently doesn't know Appellate Law and Procedure. Photo courtesy of  world-news-media.com

Side 2 of the non-defective Affidavit of Service that Richard Godosky who apparently doesn’t know Appellate Law and Procedure. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

And now for the infamous pages 12 and 13 the latter page that Richard Godosky refers to with disdain as these are just 2 pages that expressly state and document to be in court record for eternity and now on the internet for the same amount of time the immense corruption existent in the New York Judiciary.

“This is just like what I experienced with Sherman and Sunshine who refused to waive fees for me when the Help center told me the waiving of fees is abundantly common as did your clerks.

And so by denying me leave to proceed as a poor person you are accusing the clerks of lying. That said. Since when are litigants and appellants supposed to pay for justice – Never. And then when they can’t afford to pay the fees, Absolutely Never.

The only reason to withhold the transcripts from me is to hide the records from me and the public. Just like Sherman and Sunshine did.

2-What Transcripts are you referring to? Do give me clarity.You said if the Transcripts are included in the Original Papers—Again, you know very well I subpoenaed records but was deprived of my rights to obtain them by Sunshine. So you know the records don’t contain the transcripts.

I additionally requested the transcripts for the goings-on in the appellate division court re my case. I have a right to be privy to that –nowithstanding you don’t like it. I also requested the appellate Division transcripts –you arbitrarily denied transcripts—when in fact one of the people I spoke to said the Appellate Division is not a Court of record. –Well if that is so then you didn’t red my Motion Or my REPLY which is wht we thought,=–you didn’t need to you just denied inter alia so as to cow tow to your commandants. Of course if there are porceedinsgs that are recorded then I have every right to be privy to them and their transcripts—And since I have trouble with mobility and can’t make your morning sessions, then you are depriving me of my rights to be privy to the events going on in my case—which is in line with an agenda/your agenda based on neptotsim. Either way, it is my right to be privy to the goings on in my case-period.

Next quote: “Motion by the appellant, inter alia, for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 28, 2014, as a poor person, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal, to schedule any appearance on a motion or cross motion in the afternoon, and to schedule oral argument on the appeal in the afternoon.”

We are so thrilled you used the phrase “inter alia” as you have proven once again that your agenda is not based on any honesty but rather cronyism:

For if you deigned to condescend to read my Motion and Reply, instead of covertly discussing your preplanned decision with Godosky, you would have known that I also requested (top paragraph of page 13) transparency in the case, adherence to the law, the disallowance of adding or subtracting records, papers documents, etc. (All of which and worse Hamel, Jensen/D&S, Godosky, Sherman and Sunshine are notorious for,), I also requested getting transparency and adherence to the law by the App. Div. as well as my adversaries.”

And now for the world to see, in black and white the truth. Page 12 of McCray's Affidavit in Support of Motion to Reargue asking for clarification, for transparency, for adherence to law. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

And now for the world to see, in black and white the truth. Page 12 of McCray’s Affidavit in Support of Motion to Reargue asking for clarification, for transparency, for adherence to law. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

The infamous page 13 that Richard Godosky perniciously  and falsely makes reference to.  McCray quotes his own Motion as well as the Reply that prompted the reargued Motion  as well as  crooked and unlawful Decision/Court Order on it that is not based on any law. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

The infamous page 13 that Richard Godosky perniciously and falsely makes reference to. McCray quotes his own Motion as well as the Reply that prompted the reargued Motion as well as crooked and unlawful Decision/Court Order on it that is not based on any law. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

And of course the unlawful decision that elicited the reargued motion as well as Richard Godosky’s maniacal 2-page Affirmation in Opposition that the public is supposed to believe.–We can assure the undeserving appellation of Appellate Division Judge given to, Chambers, Hall, Cohen, and Miller that the public and the press do not believe either of Godosky’s Affirmations in Opposition, we know that Schwitzer & Associates don’t have a case which is among the reasons that they never provided any evidence because they haven’t any, we know that there is widespread corruption in New York government of which the corrupt judiciary is a major part and we know that William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates, and Joelle Jensen, Bert Taras, Rafael Otero, Glendoval Stephens and more were and are involved in the same, and have extorted monies from clients as that is what documents reveal.

1st page of most recent Court Order Decision of Second Department Appellate Division Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

1st page of most recent Court Order Decision of Second Department Appellate Division Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

2nd page of Second Department Appellate Division Court Order Decision complicit with the supposed alleged case fixing scams rampant in  the Judiciary, Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

2nd page of Second Department Appellate Division Court Order Decision complicit with the supposed alleged case fixing scams rampant in the Judiciary, Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Among the pointed phrases in the above Court Order that stand out is the fact that the A.D. Judges, (a misnomer) Chambers, Hall, Cohen, Miller, is “inter alia”.  Since as we have posted the very relevant pages of Charles McCray’s motion that specifically asked for transparency, abidance to law, (the motion also requested the removal of the defendants who were not included in either the check or the case as Convicted Criminal William Hamel and Schwitzer & Associates took bribes from them to be excluded giving them the money that was supposed to go to McCray, to them instead), yet nowhere in any of Godosky’s motion does he mention anything of the sort, the only way Chambers, Hall, Cohen, Miller, would know to pluralize the defendants in the caption would be by illegally communicating with Godosky. Additionally, by writing “inter alia” in re to denying the plaintiff’s motion in full, whilst he provided mounds of corroborating evidence, the only way that any smart or intelligent judge would deny transparency in a case is if he is on the take.

Chambers, Hall, Cohen, Miller, you are not smart have as you have shown yourselves to be wise guys.

Below, two of the pieces of evidence included in the plaintiff’s motions, the first is the letter from Goldberg Segalla, ( Head lawyer and siphoning instrument, Rafael Otero), illegally money laundering funds from Defendants deliberately and illegally included in the capti0n, i.e., Dave Cronen, Flo Grossman, Wini Kiernan, and Irv Salzburg but deliberately excluded from the case and the settlement check to convicted criminal William Hamel Schwitzer & Associates, Bert Taras.

But convicted criminal William Hamel, Schwitzer & Associates, Godosky & Gentile,  have claimed they “successfully” prosecuted the case–which is their claim in their current Malpractice case in Kings County Supreme, and Roy Bean Sherman, Miriam Sunshine, Chambers, Hall, Cohen, Miller, who have accepted their case without ANY corroborating evidence, are all honorable when in fact the documentation irrefutably proves otherwise?–We know not.

They only prove how rampant the corruption is and how deeply involved they are in it.

Goldberg Segalla covert 5-12-05 Kickback letter to Dinkes & Schwitzer/Schwitzer & Associates in response to Taras' 5/2/05  fax. PHoto courtesy of world-news-media.com

Goldberg Segalla covert 5-12-05 Kickback letter to Dinkes & Schwitzer/Schwitzer & Associates in response to Taras’ 5/2/05 fax. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

This is the only payment made to the Plaintiff, now Appellant, Mr. McCray. MINUS  bogus fees and disbursements. There were no other monies paid to the plaintiff. There should have been separate checks from Cronen, Grossman, Keirnan, and Salzburg paid to McCray. Alternatively, had McCray agreed, (which according to documents McCray did not), the aformentioned names should have been included on the check, the only payer of which is Great American Insurance Company who covered only 1625 Emmons Ave. --their management company Marvin Gold --who we might add isn't the management company of  individuals!

This is the only payment made to the Plaintiff, now Appellant, Mr. McCray. MINUS bogus fees and disbursements. There were no other monies paid to the plaintiff. There should have been separate checks from Cronen, Grossman, Keirnan, and Salzburg paid to McCray. Alternatively, had McCray agreed, (which according to documents McCray did not), the aformentioned names should have been included on the check, the only payer of which is Great American Insurance Company who covered only 1625 Emmons Ave. –their management company Marvin Gold –who we might add isn’t the management company of individuals!

But the unrelenting pattern of criminality is so embedded in the Judiciary,  that they have tried to accommodate Schwitzer & Associates because on the heels of the case we have been profiling they have gotten themselves in another fine mess as they are defendants in yet another case filed by a client they allegedly bilked, so that the so-called, Second Department A.D. judges, have been allowing Godosky & Gentile to file insufficient, defective and late Motions, giving them extra time, delaying the case,  because they all are members of the Legal and Judicial Cronies Club. As Richard Godosky alludes to in his 1st Aff. in Opposition in Numbers 23 and 24 he and Schwitzer & Associates are  low on dough thus to save Schwitzer & Associates money,  because there are clients-aplenty that have realized the latter has bilked them of funds, the McCrays, among them, fighting to recoup the stolen money they have plenty of charges and actions to defend!

Below is the current action against Schwitzer & Associates!

Schwitzer & Associates Alias Dinkes & Schwitzer's malpractice case newly restored to calendar. Photo courtesy of world- news-media.com

Schwitzer & Associates Alias Dinkes & Schwitzer’s malpractice case newly restored to calendar.
Photo courtesy of world- news-media.com

According to current court documents Schwitzer & Associates are again fighting an

According to current court documents Schwitzer & Associates are again fighting an “alleged” Malpractice suit, —one of many they have been deserved targets of, as well as actions filed by clients they cheated and robbed. Photo Courtesy of world-news-media.com

Above, another phony claim of a  “successfully” prosecuted case as is exhibited below in Godosky’s first Affirmation in Opposition foray:

1st page of Richard Godosky's despotic vituperation, feckless in the  attempt to double as a legal document. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

1st page of Richard Godosky’s despotic vituperation, feckless in the attempt to double as a legal document. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Notice how Godosky claims the action is not appealable when in fact any Order or Judgement is appealable.

Everyone please look at Richard Godosky’s mania at its hilt as he claims that Dinkes &  Schiwtzer “successfully” prosecuted  the Plaintiff, Charles McCray’s case when in fact humongous amounts of money is missing, the names of individual defendants are missing from the settlement check as well as their names, there was no separate litigation for them and there are documents besides the check that prove that William Hamel, Dinkes & Schiwtzer, and Bert Taras took bribes from the defendants to be excluded from the case siphoned through Rafael Otero of Goldberg Segalla!

Schwitzer & Associates owe the plaintiff,  in the case we have been following millions of dollars they stole. And they obviously owe other former clients which is precisely why they are being protected by the corrupt Judiciary.

Page 2 of Richard Godosky's Affirmation in Opposition where he doesn't simply opine but rather predicts that it is

Page 2 of Richard Godosky’s Affirmation in Opposition where he doesn’t simply opine but rather predicts that it is “usless” for McCray to pursue this endeavour,. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Richard Godosky quotes the relevant law, than claims it is too lenient and demands the plaintiff be required to submit other and different documents than required by law! These are not statements written by a person who functions with clarity!

Page 3 of Richard Godosky's supposed  Affirmation in Opposition, in reality continuing to gripe that his white collar criminal cronies, who refuse to obey the law, paying reparations to their victims, are monetarily liable for the cost of this case ---which they instituted themselves as they thought they wouldn't get caught stealing their clients' monies and keeping and profitting  from money that doesn't belong to them. Photo courtesy world-news-media.com

Page 3 of Richard Godosky’s supposed Affirmation in Opposition, in reality continuing to gripe that his white collar criminal cronies, who refuse to obey the law, paying reparations to their victims, are monetarily liable for the cost of this case —which they instituted themselves as they thought they wouldn’t get caught stealing their clients’ monies and keeping and profitting from money that doesn’t belong to them. Photo courtesy world-news-media.com

Notice how Richard Godosky proceeds to besmirch the doctors who support the honest citizenry. It is obvious to us that Richard Godosky thinks he and his cronies are entitled to violate the law and if the public doesn’t like it– tough!

Page 4 of richard Godosky's Affirmation in Opposition about nothing, as it is  non-substantive,  and highly redundant for he cannot make a legitiamte point as he is inadequate. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Page 4 of richard Godosky’s Affirmation in Opposition about nothing, as it is non-substantive, and highly redundant for he cannot make a legitiamte point as he is inadequate. Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Page 5 of Godosky's Affirmation in Oppostion,--no change all in the same vein. Mr. G is demanding  the appellate Division Mssrs.     genuflect and tie his shoelaces.  Photo courtesy world-news-media.com

Page 5 of Godosky’s Affirmation in Oppostion,–no change all in the same vein. Mr. G is demanding the appellate Division Mssrs. genuflect and tie his shoelaces. Photo courtesy world-news-media.com

The crazed and loopy Richard Godosky  sallies forth demanding in # 23:”…accordingly the claim should be denied with costs”!, which we all have been laughing hysterically at since it is the right of any individual to appeal a judgement. It is Convicted criminal William Hamel and Schiwtzer & Associates that stole enormous amounts of money from their clients and we have the proof. It is they who need pay reparations to their victims per the law.

The deranged Richard Godosky who’s disrepute via his threats, and crazy claims, speaks volumes as well as leads and follows him wherever he goes, then is still not embarrassed to write: #24: ….but the costs to our clients which well exceed the fee payable to our clients which has not yet been released.”! The plaintiff  requests poor person’s relief giving proof of need and fulfilling the requirements for such and Richard Godosky vehmently objects, when in fact it is his clients who stole monies that were supposed to be paid to the Plaintiff, and then he complains that his clients are in arrears.

In Open Court, Loud Mouthpiece Crazy Richard Godosky threatens petitioner/Plaintiff ON RECORD, only to receive  Special Referee Sunshine's feckless response. Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com

In Open Court, Loud Mouthpiece Crazy Richard Godosky threatens petitioner/Plaintiff ON RECORD, only to receive Special Referee Sunshine’s feckless response. Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com

By the way, that can only mean that Schwitzer & Associates are and will be continuing to pilfer from their clients to recoup the monies which is why they are again involved in another alleged Malpractice case. (Alleged, yeah right!)

Below is the  Court Order, Decision, rendered by Chambers, Hall, Cohen, and Miller on the original motion submitted by the Plaintiff, McCray. We would call them judges but they are undeserving of the honorific.

1st page of most recent Court Order Decision of Second Department Appellate Division Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

1st page of most recent Court Order Decision of Second Department Appellate Division Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

2nd page of Second Department Appellate Division Court Order Decision complicit with the supposed alleged case fixing scams rampant in  the Judiciary, Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

2nd page of Second Department Appellate Division Court Order Decision complicit with the supposed alleged case fixing scams rampant in the Judiciary, Photo courtesy of world-news-media.com

Below are just two of the other examples of corruption in New York Judiciary The first 2 of course by none other than “Roy Bean” Sherman in flagrant violation of the law, and below that, his sidekick Special Referee Miriam Sunshine in blatant violation of the law.

This is the public version  of Sherman's  Illegal Court Order. that he loudly announced in open court. on record . Sherman made sure to give the Petitioner a copy before leaving. This is an illegal Order  as the pro se Petitioner said on many occasions that  the case was going to be prosecuted  pro se which is the right of any petitioner and a judge can't devise an order  demanding a Petitioner be represented by legal counsel. Of course Roy Bean showing his illegal bent blatantly demonstrates where his allegiance lies and that is with lawlessness  coming down with this  illegal decision to wasting the time and money of the Petitioner, and taxpayers,  in an effort to strike points with the Defendants. This is a prime example of abuse of power and obstruction of justice. Roy Bean there is no excuse. --but wait there's more.....Photo courtesy of world-News-Media.com

This is the public version of Sherman’s Illegal Court Order. that he loudly announced in open court. on record . Sherman made sure to give the Petitioner a copy before leaving. This is an illegal Order as the pro se Petitioner said on many occasions that the case was going to be prosecuted pro se which is the right of any petitioner and a judge can’t devise an order demanding a Petitioner be represented by legal counsel. Of course Roy Bean showing his illegal bent blatantly demonstrates where his allegiance lies and that is with lawlessness coming down with this illegal decision to wasting the time and money of the Petitioner, and taxpayers, in an effort to strike points with the Defendants. This is a prime example of abuse of power and obstruction of justice. Roy Bean there is no excuse. –but wait there’s more…..Photo courtesy of world-News-Media.com

This was the 11/14/12 Secret and Contrary version of the illegal  COURT  ORDER, diametrically opposed to the public version declared and disseminated in court that Roy Bean Sherman wrote on the sly, apparently planning to use if the plaintiff were stupid enough to obey his command to hire an attorney. Sherman created  the  Order without the knowledge, and consultation of the petitioner in fact hid this order from petitioner, and  public file committing Abuse of Power, Obstruction of Justice. This order only found its way to the public file via the plaintiff who included it in motions. This Order indicates Roy Bean Sherman along with the Defendants, Hamel, Jensen and their lawyers, Godosky & Gentile, would have made yet another illegal  and shrouded deal,  this time with whatever lawyer that might have been hired to betray the plaintiff, apparently they.Hamel Jensen,  Godosky & Gentile   would have used any tactics including blackmail, to safeguard  their white collar criminal cronies from incarceration Roy Bean specifically says in his order that upon the

This was the 11/14/12 Secret and Contrary version of the illegal COURT ORDER, diametrically opposed to the public version declared and disseminated in court that Roy Bean Sherman wrote on the sly, apparently planning to use if the plaintiff were stupid enough to obey his command to hire an attorney. Sherman created the Order without the knowledge, and consultation of the petitioner in fact hid this order from petitioner, and public file committing Abuse of Power, Obstruction of Justice. This order only found its way to the public file via the plaintiff who included it in motions. This Order indicates Roy Bean Sherman along with the Defendants, Hamel, Jensen and their lawyers, Godosky & Gentile, would have made yet another illegal and shrouded deal, this time with whatever lawyer that might have been hired to betray the plaintiff, apparently they.Hamel Jensen, Godosky & Gentile would have used any tactics including blackmail, to safeguard their white collar criminal cronies from incarceration Roy Bean specifically says in his order that upon the ” whereby new counsel will make a motion to restore to calendar”–This completely illegal as the case was and still is active, and obtaining legal counsel is irrelevant. Roy Bean’s order goes on to say, specifically “At this point the is case is disposed.” This is just one example of Roy Bean being deeply involved in Judicial corruption, participating in the Case -Fixing scam, implementing and partaking in Obstruction of Justice, –which is precisely why the Petitioner’s name is withheld for the protection purposes. The photo is Courtesy of World-News-Media.com

The minutes from the transcript of 9/11/13 court appearance where Sunshine demands Hamel shows up in court

The minutes from the transcript of 9/11/13 court appearance where Sunshine demands Hamel shows up in court

Sunshine's court order  reinforcing her statements made on 9/11/13,  demanding Hamel come into court to testify, supporting Subpoena duces tecum for Hamel  and denying motion to quash it.

Sunshine’s court order reinforcing her statements made on 9/11/13, demanding Hamel come into court to testify, supporting Subpoena duces tecum for Hamel and denying motion to quash it.

This is the 1st page of the 4/8/14 Senseless Sunshine Decision/Court Order as  she not only lies about demanding Hamel testify, but illegally reverses her own order, and further stupidly records in writing that Dinkes & Schwitzer can choose whom they please in place of Hamel ( we have no doubt that she had input  in that selection). She demonstrates she is a participant in the case-Fixing scams prevalent in the Judiciary, partaking in Obstruction of Justice, additionally wasting more of Petitioners/ Taxpayer's time and money We have for the purposes of protection of the Petitioner crossed out the name. Photo Courtesy of World-New-Media.com

This is the 1st page of the 4/8/14 Senseless Sunshine Decision/Court Order as she not only lies about demanding Hamel testify, but illegally reverses her own order, and further stupidly records in writing that Dinkes & Schwitzer can choose whom they please in place of Hamel ( we have no doubt that she had input in that selection). She demonstrates she is a participant in the case-Fixing scams prevalent in the Judiciary, partaking in Obstruction of Justice, additionally wasting more of Petitioners/ Taxpayer’s time and money We have for the purposes of protection of the Petitioner crossed out the name.
Photo Courtesy of World-New-Media.com

This is the 4/8/14 Court Order and 2nd Court Order Decision of Spec. FREf. Senseless Sunshine. If you notice  how she attempts to illegal revoke her 1st decision--She cannot It is Illegal It is also ILLEGAL to have someone/someone else choose who they want to testify when a specific individual is subpoenaed. Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com

This is the 4/8/14 Court Order and 2nd Court Order Decision of Spec. FREf. Senseless Sunshine. If you notice how she attempts to illegal revoke her 1st decision–She cannot It is Illegal It is also ILLEGAL to have someone/someone else choose who they want to testify when a specific individual is subpoenaed.
Photo Courtesy of World-News-Media.com

That said, any persons foolish enough to have kept their heads in the sand hiring Schwitzer & Associates  will not be pleased to know that they have been fighting yet another alleged, malpractice case filed by another of the many clients that William Hamel and Schwitzer  & Associates –who at that time were known by their alias Dinkes & Schwitzer, —that were their alleged extortion victims (alleged, right).

Richard Godosky, his firm, their clients and cronies, Roy Bean Sherman, Miriam Sunshine, Chambers, Hall, Cohen, and Miller, all needed to be put out to pasture long ago,–and without pay. Their alleged illegal activities went unnoticed and unchecked in the day has long passed. Documents substantiating crimes are easy to come by and easy to post. (Alleged, yeah sure!)

Judges or not, they have to learn when they don’t respect the public for whom they are supposed to work and per the responsibility of their job,  they do not deserve the respect due a Judge. When you act like a judge, uphold the law and the people that pay your salary, you will be treated like a judge.

For it is the time of rapid communication, and the internet, –Messrs. everyone knows about the criminality you are allegedly committing; your alleged unlawful behavior is in the court records forever, on the internet for infinity.

Warning: Richard Godosky has made numerous threats, as has convicted criminal William Hamel, Joelle Jensen. Should anything happen to the plaintiff or one of our staff, members of the public, the press, as well as law enforcement, are on high alert to instantaneously go after the perpetrator.

Schwitzer & Associates As Usual Waste Taxpayer Time And Money As: 1- Richard Godosky  Submits Second Bogus Affirmation In Opposition, —-Now, A Two-Page Document Devoid Of Any Exhibits,— Which Manages To Illegally Include In Caption The Four Defendants,I.E., Dave Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, Who, As Everyone  Knows, Paid Bribes To William Hamel and Dinkes & Schwtizer Alias, Schwitzer & Associates To be Ousted From Case, Accepted In Full, (Via Crony Godosky Covert Decree), By Allegedly Corrupt Second Department Appellate Division Judges, Chambers, Hall, Cohen and Miller, (Allegedly, oh right!).
 2-According To Court Documents, Schwitzer & Associates Are Allegedly Being Sued For Malpractice —–Yet Again (Allegedly, oh sure!). We Do Not Advise Hiring Convicted Criminal William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Of Schwitzer & Associates, Schwitzer & Associates, Or Godosky & Gentile, As They Are In It For Themselves

We are now on Facebook–Visit us.

THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD

THE INTERNET IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Schwitzer & Associates Alias Dinkes & Schwitzer As Usual. Allegedly Violate Taxpayers Stealing Their Time And Money As —1. Richard Godosky Submits Second Bogus Affirmation In Opposition, —-This Time, A Two-Page Document Devoid Of Any Evidence/Exhibits,— Yet Manages To Illegally Include In Caption The Four Defendants, I.E., Dave Cronen, Florence Grossman, Winifred Kiernan, Irving Salzburg, Who, As Everyone Knows, Paid Bribes To Convicted Criminal, William Hamel And Dinkes & Schwtizer Alias, Schwitzer & Associates To be Ousted From Substratal Case, Illegal Actions Allegedly Emulated And Accepted In Full, By Allegedly Corrupt Second Department Appellate Division Judges, (A Misnomer) Chambers, Hall, Cohen and Miller, Via Crony Godosky Covert Decree, (Allegedly, oh right!). ————— 2.According To Court Documents, Schwitzer & Associates Are Allegedly Being Sued For Malpractice —–Yet Again! (Allegedly, oh sure!) We Do Not Advise Hiring Convicted Criminal William Hamel, Joelle Jensen, Of Schwitzer & Associates, Schwitzer & Associates, Or Godosky & Gentile, As They Are In It For Themselves at world-news-media.com.

meta

%d bloggers like this: